Scratch

Lucario621 wrote:

Penguinsrock wrote:

Atleast we're not being rude, even if we don't notice we sound rude. You know how hard I try not to say things rudely? No, you're not me - Nobody would know, actually.

I do very much respect you animators for trying to be kind, and un-rowdy. But the problem is that you guys aren't being very smart or reasonable.

That's true...I guess I should've noticed that earlier.    Sorry.

cocoanut wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

Penguinsrock wrote:

But your project doesn't have to be the other 5 if we don't want too. >:3 Have you noticed the larger selection of emoticons us RPers have? Lol, nah - Jking, I dunno.

No, it's just you haven't noticed any of the 5. Maybe if you did you would try making varying projects. I have made a project for everything except story. For you it would probably be art and animation only.

There's something wrong with animation now?

I have checked all but story as well.

And you admit you have checked art, do you?

All of my projects with "art" ticked are artistic games, like the sea urchin series, which use a style of graphic design to portray a cartoony sea. On the overall, it is a game though.

I have no projects where "art" is the only box ticked.

People should broaden their horizons, cocoanut. If the artists began programming we could have some stunning programs and interactive art pieces.

Theexplodingcheez is a great example of someone who has done every genre. An example of a good scratch user, other than the slight downsides that come with fame for children.

When I re-read the stuff from the 'gamers', I notice how in-depth it is. Even if offending, I respect the great points you guys have. Some of them true, but I'll still be supporting art. Huzzah. >:3

Penguinsrock wrote:

When I re-read the stuff from the 'gamers', I notice how in-depth it is. Even if offending, I respect the great points you guys have. Some of them true, but I'll still be supporting art. Huzzah. >:3

I was with you for the first 2 sentences. Then I was like, wait what?
"You make great points, in-depth posts, however I will still thoughtlessly support art because um . . . we'll get back to you on that one."

demosthenes wrote:

Penguinsrock wrote:

When I re-read the stuff from the 'gamers', I notice how in-depth it is. Even if offending, I respect the great points you guys have. Some of them true, but I'll still be supporting art. Huzzah. >:3

I was with you for the first 2 sentences. Then I was like, wait what?
"You make great points, in-depth posts, however I will still thoughtlessly support art because um . . . we'll get back to you on that one."

Exactly.

Winston Churchill would be with us! 

RHY3756547 wrote:

Theexplodingcheez is a great example of someone who has done every genre. An example of a good scratch user, other than the slight downsides that come with fame for children.

Meh. I still hate him. He has too much fame >:3

demosthenes wrote:

Penguinsrock wrote:

When I re-read the stuff from the 'gamers', I notice how in-depth it is. Even if offending, I respect the great points you guys have. Some of them true, but I'll still be supporting art. Huzzah. >:3

I was with you for the first 2 sentences. Then I was like, wait what?
"You make great points, in-depth posts, however I will still thoughtlessly support art because um . . . we'll get back to you on that one."

Lol 

demosthenes wrote:

Penguinsrock wrote:

When I re-read the stuff from the 'gamers', I notice how in-depth it is. Even if offending, I respect the great points you guys have. Some of them true, but I'll still be supporting art. Huzzah. >:3

I was with you for the first 2 sentences. Then I was like, wait what?
"You make great points, in-depth posts, however I will still thoughtlessly support art because um . . . we'll get back to you on that one."

Ha, I know - I'm a VERY odd person. It could take ages to explain why I'll still support art.

demosthenes wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

demosthenes wrote:

I was with you for the first 2 sentences. Then I was like, wait what?
"You make great points, in-depth posts, however I will still thoughtlessly support art because um . . . we'll get back to you on that one."

I think she was trying to be nice, not get joked on.

Yeah >.> I sort-of posted without thought. Sorry if you were offended, I'm glad that we might be able to compromise.

YAY! Finally another sorry.                   LOL COLON BRACKET.

Survivorduck wrote:

tell them that scratch id for all types of projects. not just games!

We didn't say games.

We said

[blocks]
<if> <not> Art   >>
<end>
[/blocks]

Last edited by RHY3756547 (2010-04-30 20:25:19)

BaVB wrote:

I'm sorta neutral in this fight, yet, I'm still leaning towards the programmers side. Art can be cool and awesome to look at, but really wasn't that made for deviantART(or whatever it's called)? I mean really. There were websites actually MADE for art, unlike Scratch. As a quote I heard in the past, "it's not 'Scratch: Imagine, DRAW, Share'." Then there's the whole RPing problem. I'm trying to stop RPing in the galleries, but it's so fun! X3 But anyway, yeah, I'll eventually stop RPing and my RP buddies will be asking two weeks later why I haven't been RPing lately. Then I'll be on the programmer side completely! ^^

Is that a reason to rejoice?

MY PLAN:

Gamers Do This:

1. If you see a 'pointless' art project, don't view it if you don't want it top viewed!

2. Look at games, if that is what you want to see.

3. Don't bother artists!

4. Let scratch be diverse 

5. Remember that not everyone is as good a programmer as you.

5. Make games and have fun with it.


Artists Do This:

1. Don't let the gamers get on your nerves.

2. Do what you want on scratch, even if its little programming.

3. Don't bother gamers!

4. Let scratch be diverse 

5. Make art and have fun with it.