Pages: 1 2
Topic closed
I don't see what the problem is with having too many pixels in your signature. I mean, the forums still work, right? It's not like someone's carrying a virus around here... sorry, I tend to challenge forums rules a lot.
I'm pretty sure that my signature's all right pixelwise, right?

Offline
TheGenius95 wrote:
I don't see what the problem is with having too many pixels in your signature. I mean, the forums still work, right? It's not like someone's carrying a virus around here... sorry, I tend to challenge forums rules a lot.
I'm pretty sure that my signature's all right pixelwise, right?
Your signature is okay pixelwise.
The implementation of a height limit on signatures comes from the fact that large,tall signatures can sometimes make a thread difficult to read. Because of this, large images in signatures that surpass the 150 pixel height requirement are automatically shrunken down to an appropriate size, and Scratchers who use image-stacking to boost their signature height are usually asked by the Scratch Team to change the signature so it is less tall.

Offline
Paddle2See wrote:
rdococ wrote:
Mine is ??? pixels?
150?
Or over/under?
Found out; 324 x 150. Is that okay?That's fine
![]()
Thank you. What is the pixel of 324 x 150?
Offline
Mine is 150 px plus a line of text.
Last edited by Aidan (2010-03-28 11:23:55)
Offline
I have a NEW sig now.
How much?
Offline
Yours is 115 pixels from top to bottom.
Including both images.
Offline
Here's 150 pixels:![]()
You can use that to estimate your signature height.
Offline
Yeah... the tallest image on yours is 150... and then there's a row of text under it... I don't know how high the text is, though...
Offline
Wolfie1996 wrote:
Yeah... the tallest image on yours is 150... and then there's a row of text under it... I don't know how high the text is, though...
Meh It's just a bit over I'll be fine
Offline
Topic closed
Pages: 1 2