Scratch

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 18:06:43

08jackt wrote:
The characters are anthros, not mental animals.
Yeah. Because a talking, emo cat isn't strange at all.

Their hair is always like that. Epic, IKR. And not all of them have bangs either.
Yeah....only over 80% of them.

They always do.
Wow...great argument you got there. Yet again, I suppose it is perfectly normal for a cat's favourite food to be banana smoothies.

Doesn't everyone?
Yeah...but normally not english speaking cats.

Over half of Anthros aren't wolves, genius.
Yeah, your right.

Just these ones:
Anthro's unite
War of the south
WOTF(more than one)
Inhuman
You can run
The shadowed lands
WOTF, next generation
The gaurdians
Inhuman, The next gen
WOUP
Messengers
Enternal one(twighlight)

Definitely less than half.

PWN'D

Wow. You obviously don't know Scratch media.

1. Ugh, you really don't get it. It's kind of like an anthro is a human spirit is trapped in an animal body. Whatever. And they're not emo. Just because of one hairstyle, you think it's okay to judge everyone by it?
2. No, actually.
3.*refer to 1* And some of them don't speak(Maki-Tak's Poison), some speak different languages too.
4.
Anthros Unite: Some are (physically looking) wolves, some are cats, some are dogs, snakes, bears, weasels, meerkats, or even horses.
War of the South: http://scratch.mit.edu/galleries/view/68597 Those are HUMANS.
WOTF: Those are cats, in case you are blind or something.
Inhuman: http://scratch.mit.edu/galleries/view/69682 Where are the Wolves?
You Can Run: Werewolves, vampires, and other supernaturals. Not technically wolves.
The Shadowed Lands: IDK what that one is about.
WOTF, The Next Generation: Same as WOTF.
The Guardians: Yes, 1 point for you. Your only point.
Inhuman, The Next Generation: Same as Inhuman.
WOUP: Fail. Those are cats too. http://scratch.mit.edu/galleries/view/74451
Messengers: http://scratch.mit.edu/galleries/view/74451 ......That's not even close.
Eternal One: http://scratch.mit.edu/galleries/view/60567/added/asc Nope, no wolves.

Basic rule: I might seem like a complete fool, but I'm not.

PWNED.

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 18:07:54

floatingmagictree wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
Call them RPGs if you want, but what you do in them does not change the true reference of "RPG."

You can't change a widly believed (accept form the noobs on scratch) acronym.
Yeah, so we're not gonna change it.
Ha, you called yourself a noob.

That depends.

soupoftomato · 2010-03-11 19:55:39

littletonkslover wrote:
Wow. You obviously don't know Scratch media.

Oh you mean that stuff with actual programming?

RPGs are not Scratch media, the media that was meant and supposed to be on Scratch is prgramming; go program a good game and say with a straight face your so-called "RPGs" are better.

Last edited by soupoftomato (2010-03-11 19:56:42)

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 20:01:21

soupoftomato wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
Wow. You obviously don't know Scratch media.
Oh you mean that stuff with actual programming?

RPGs are not Scratch media, the media that was meant and supposed to be on Scratch is prgramming; go program a good game and say with a straight face your so-called "RPGs" are better.

RPGs allow much more creativity(in my opinion) and anyone can join.

soupoftomato · 2010-03-11 20:03:34

littletonkslover wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
Wow. You obviously don't know Scratch media.
Oh you mean that stuff with actual programming?

RPGs are not Scratch media, the media that was meant and supposed to be on Scratch is prgramming; go program a good game and say with a straight face your so-called "RPGs" are better.
RPGs allow much more creativity(in my opinion) and anyone can join.

ANYONE can prgram, they can be as CREATIVE as they want.

Even more creative when their character/program isn't an *cough*emo-cat.*cough*

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 20:08:54

soupoftomato wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:

Oh you mean that stuff with actual programming?

RPGs are not Scratch media, the media that was meant and supposed to be on Scratch is prgramming; go program a good game and say with a straight face your so-called "RPGs" are better.
RPGs allow much more creativity(in my opinion) and anyone can join.
ANYONE can prgram, they can be as CREATIVE as they want.

Even more creative when their character/program isn't an *cough*emo-cat.*cough*

What's with programmers and stereotypes?

wink

webgal15 · 2010-03-11 20:16:09

littletonkslover wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:

RPGs allow much more creativity(in my opinion) and anyone can join.
ANYONE can prgram, they can be as CREATIVE as they want.

Even more creative when their character/program isn't an *cough*emo-cat.*cough*
What's with programmers and stereotypes?

Like you said before, not all the cats are emo...

soupoftomato · 2010-03-11 20:47:18

littletonkslover wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:

RPGs allow much more creativity(in my opinion) and anyone can join.
ANYONE can prgram, they can be as CREATIVE as they want.

Even more creative when their character/program isn't an *cough*emo-cat.*cough*
What's with programmers and stereotypes?

Stereotyping isn't bad when it re-enforces programming.

Go join a no-age-restriction art sharing website.

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 20:52:07

soupoftomato wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:

ANYONE can prgram, they can be as CREATIVE as they want.

Even more creative when their character/program isn't an *cough*emo-cat.*cough*
What's with programmers and stereotypes?

Stereotyping isn't bad when it re-enforces programming.

Go join a no-age-restriction art sharing website.

That's really hard to find.

And I don't care about programming that much, so bug off.

illusionist · 2010-03-11 20:53:14

Shame wrote:
I don't care about programming that much, so bug off.

Shameful quote is shameful.

Last edited by illusionist (2010-03-11 20:54:01)

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 20:56:59

illusionist wrote:
Shame wrote:
I don't care about programming that much, so bug off.
Shameful quote is shameful.

Pointless post is pointless.

illusionist · 2010-03-11 20:59:03

littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Shame wrote:
I don't care about programming that much, so bug off.
Shameful quote is shameful.
Pointless post is pointless.

Insult to Scratch is insulting.

FMT was right...

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 21:00:55

illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:

Shameful quote is shameful.
Pointless post is pointless.
Insult to Scratch is insulting.

FMT was right...

About what?

illusionist · 2010-03-11 21:14:38

littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:

Pointless post is pointless.
Insult to Scratch is insulting.

FMT was right...
About what?

Polysemousious equivocational tergiversatious ambiguity time!

FMT was right about your insufficiency of altercational competence.

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 21:16:34

illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:

Insult to Scratch is insulting.

FMT was right...
About what?
Polysemousious equivocational tergiversatious ambiguity time!

FMT was right about your insufficiency of altercational competence.

D:< Don't listen to him. I can argue!

Someday I'll show everyone......

Kileymeister · 2010-03-11 21:17:39

illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Insult to Scratch is insulting.

FMT was right...
About what?
Polysemousious equivocational tergiversatious ambiguity time!

FMT was right about your insufficiency of altercational competence.

Ouch, you have inflicted an abrasion upon my mentality. The floccinaucinihilipilification of my brain has been augmented by that.

Last edited by Kileymeister (2010-03-11 21:20:05)

webgal15 · 2010-03-11 21:20:54

I think you guys that don't like stuff like WOTF should ignore it.

Also, add Flat Screen to the list.

Last edited by webgal15 (2010-03-11 21:21:43)

illusionist · 2010-03-11 21:25:30

littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:

About what?
Polysemousious equivocational tergiversatious ambiguity time!

FMT was right about your insufficiency of altercational competence.
D:< Don't listen to him. I can argue!

Someday I'll show everyone......

Good! Good! Reference.co- I mean my vocab is great isn't it? tongue

Back on the topic of whether or not caricatists are opportune for a domain based on sprightliness and bilateral interdependent reciprocation.

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 21:29:46

illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:

Polysemousious equivocational tergiversatious ambiguity time!

FMT was right about your insufficiency of altercational competence.
D:< Don't listen to him. I can argue!

Someday I'll show everyone......
Good! Good! Reference.co- I mean my vocab is great isn't it?

Back on the topic of whether or not caricatists are opportune for a domain based on sprightliness and bilateral interdependent reciprocation.

Whether or not drawers are meant for a place based............

Of course everyone should be able to do what they want.

Like trying to figure out what Kenny is saying behind his hood.

illusionist · 2010-03-11 21:32:20

littletonkslover wrote:
Of course everyone should be able to do what they want.

This is why people get excommunicated.

And why the world will discontinue.

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 21:35:35

illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
Of course everyone should be able to do what they want.
This is why people get excommunicated.

And why the world will discontinue.

Well, share what media they want.

Not like go on serial killing in a Walmart with a tablet pen, bamboo stick, and trained canis lupis.

illusionist · 2010-03-11 21:43:51

littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
Of course everyone should be able to do what they want.
This is why people get excommunicated.

And why the world will discontinue.
Well, share what media they want.

Not like go on serial killing in a Walmart with a tablet pen, bamboo stick, and trained canis lupis.

You are starting to sound like Blade.

littletonkslover · 2010-03-11 21:46:33

illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:

This is why people get excommunicated.

And why the world will discontinue.
Well, share what media they want.

Not like go on serial killing in a Walmart with a tablet pen, bamboo stick, and trained canis lupis.
You are starting to sound like Blade.

Hm, I think I'm starting to sound like a spazzing polecat.

doormat9 · 2010-03-11 21:47:48

i have 3 but nobody has ever seen them so dont even bother to list them well, maybe one person

illusionist · 2010-03-11 21:51:38

littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:

Well, share what media they want.

Not like go on serial killing in a Walmart with a tablet pen, bamboo stick, and trained canis lupis.
You are starting to sound like Blade.
Hm, I think I'm starting to sound like a spazzing polecat.

WORDS ARE NOT BIG ENOUGH!!!

Invisible text to avoid the caps rule. lol

Scratch

archived forums

#51 2010-03-11 18:06:43

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

08jackt wrote:

#52 2010-03-11 18:07:54

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

floatingmagictree wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

#53 2010-03-11 19:55:39

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

littletonkslover wrote:

#54 2010-03-11 20:01:21

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

soupoftomato wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

#55 2010-03-11 20:03:34

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

littletonkslover wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

#56 2010-03-11 20:08:54

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

soupoftomato wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

#57 2010-03-11 20:16:09

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

littletonkslover wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

#58 2010-03-11 20:47:18

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

littletonkslover wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

#59 2010-03-11 20:52:07

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

soupoftomato wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

#60 2010-03-11 20:53:14

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

Shame wrote:

#61 2010-03-11 20:56:59

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

illusionist wrote:

Shame wrote:

#62 2010-03-11 20:59:03

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

littletonkslover wrote:

illusionist wrote:

Shame wrote:

#63 2010-03-11 21:00:55

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

illusionist wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

illusionist wrote:

#64 2010-03-11 21:14:38

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

littletonkslover wrote:

illusionist wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

#65 2010-03-11 21:16:34

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

illusionist wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

illusionist wrote:

#66 2010-03-11 21:17:39

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

illusionist wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

illusionist wrote:

#67 2010-03-11 21:20:54

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

#68 2010-03-11 21:25:30

Re: So many RPGs I cant keep track!

littletonkslover wrote:

illusionist wrote: