Scratch

ScratchGenius7 wrote:

turtlewarrior wrote:

Dark Mark's: 5/10. Looks good, but there isn't actually game play.
Scratch Genius': 5/10: Many glitches, really short.

what short??????????????? im soooooooo young

That doesn't affect your score...  If you're so young, how old are you?

Last edited by Kileymeister (2010-03-10 19:09:42)

RHY3756547 wrote:

Kileymeister wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

* SCRATCH SPEED TAKING OFF POINTS BLEUAHFJHJHFDHGNIKV^^BN

Just accept you lost 

Sore winner.

MR TURTLE SIR HIS IDEA AND ALL THE FEATURES WERE COPIED OFF OF AN IPOD TOUCH APP OF THE SAME NAME SO DEDUCT 100000000 POINTS PLOX

Actually, your a sore loser. You lost. Just accept it!

So have you come to a decision on Stickman Animator vs. Wii Light Pong yet?

Wow. I actually beat RHY3756547? Woah...

marcsteene wrote:

turtlewarrior wrote:

The gameplay was fine, but it was slow except when downloaded.

That's the main reason why I implemented the timer based system, so in effect if you have an average computer it shouldn't perform too badly.

turtlewarrior wrote:

The sound effects were fine, but could be much better

The sound effects were used in Call of Duty 5 as well as various other commercial games, and if it's good enough for them then it's sure as hell good enough for a free Scratch game.

turtlewarrior wrote:

Plus, Scratch is meant for people of all ages, and if something like that was shown to four year-olds, it wouldn't be too good.

Hence why I put a warning when the game is first opened explaining about the "graphic" scenes.

turtlewarrior wrote:

But the thing you need to understand about this is that it was an OPINION.

You're personal opinion should play almost no part in the rating, the game should be judged on different criteria and not your personal opinion. Because I don't like paint games and think they're pointless doesn't mean I'd rate them all 1/10, I'd rate in on the graphics and quality of programming.

I assumed this competition had a judging critera with a proper ratings system, but clearly not, hence why I've lost all respect for this competition.

Would you please stop!

calebxy wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

Kileymeister wrote:

Just accept you lost 

Sore winner.

MR TURTLE SIR HIS IDEA AND ALL THE FEATURES WERE COPIED OFF OF AN IPOD TOUCH APP OF THE SAME NAME SO DEDUCT 100000000 POINTS PLOX

Actually, your a sore loser. You lost. Just accept it!

It's called a JOKE.

J

O

K

E

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Joke

How many people have I had to describe this to so far?

The-Whiz wrote:

Wow. I actually beat RHY3756547? Woah...

You never bet me... You weren't against me...

marcsteene wrote:

No?...

Also, please stop quoting my long posts, you're just wasting this thread's already wasted space.

No, seriously. The judgement has been passed, this is over. And, you STILL HAVE ANOTHER PROJECT GOING OVER TO THE NEXT ROUND! Just because you think something should go doesn't mean it will. If you continue this anymore you'll be ignored.

Anyway... next round will be Spiderman 0.4 by Calbxy Versus... Round Madness by Technoguyx. Yays!

RHY3756547 wrote:

BTW - my second project is LINE.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/RHY3756547/715593

That's been on front page...

You need another judge? I can help 

mkolpnji wrote:

turtlewarrior wrote:

marcsteene wrote:

No?...

Also, please stop quoting my long posts, you're just wasting this thread's already wasted space.

No, seriously. The judgement has been passed, this is over. And, you STILL HAVE ANOTHER PROJECT GOING OVER TO THE NEXT ROUND! Just because you think something should go doesn't mean it will. If you continue this anymore you'll be ignored.

Anyway... next round will be Spiderman 0.4 by Calbxy Versus... Round Madness by Technoguyx. Yays!

eh, cough.
This was a post from the 6th page that I made that was completely ignored. -_-

Original Post:
Although I'm not a judge, I'm still going to express my opinion.
Horde Survival should have had a better chance at winning.

The programming was good.
The gameplay was good.
The sound effects and quotes were cool.
It had great graphics.

Even though it has a lot of violence, It's a good project, and people aren't supposed to be subjective while judging. Just because you didn't like what the game was about shouldn't mean that you rate it a lower score.

It's the actual game and how it plays and its quality that counts.

Just expressing my opinion.

Okay, let me rephrase what I just said. ANYONE talking about this will be ignored because the contest is slowing down with all these posts. So please just stop. Pretty please.

EDIT: eh, nvm.

Last edited by mkolpnji (2010-03-11 22:53:34)