Scratch

Nice... but blue hair? 
....................................
Feedback on mine? 

EDIT: It's a new page, and I don't think people usually bother looking back... so I'll post my image again:

There... 

Last edited by Chrischb (2010-02-26 05:56:30)

Awesomeness,  .

Last edited by soupoftomato (2010-02-26 21:51:25)

littletonkslover wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/3705/12tacosrock.jpg

Awesomeness,  .

That just scared me.


http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2010/ … slover.jpg New one.

Nice.

His clothes and his hair.

floatingmagictree wrote:

Dazachi wrote:

His clothes and his hair.

lawl..... I'm pretty sure that's a self portrait of Tonkie.

Oh, whoops. I am assuming it is a she then?? I am so confused?

floatingmagictree wrote:

Dazachi wrote:

floatingmagictree wrote:

lawl..... I'm pretty sure that's a self portrait of Tonkie.

Oh, whoops. I am assuming it is a she then?? I am so confused?

U so pro.

?

08jackt wrote:

More:

http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/ … 8jackt.gif

Wow!

RHY3756547 wrote:

The only art I can do is advanced graphic design. Not really art.

What is that?

I call it, "Daniel at the Mountains," or "Mountain Boy," for short.

Feedback?

floatingmagictree wrote:

Oh how I wish I had a scanner......

If you have a digital camera, you can just take a photo instead (trust me, digital cameras are more superior when retaining art quality).

cheddargirl wrote:

floatingmagictree wrote:

Oh how I wish I had a scanner......

If you have a digital camera, you can just take a photo instead (trust me, digital cameras are more superior when retaining art quality).

Really? I remember having an art thread where I did that but I had a terribly laggy and inefficient program for uploading the pictures so I only posted about 3. I can go dig it back up in the old I&M.

floatingmagictree wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:

floatingmagictree wrote:

Oh how I wish I had a scanner......

If you have a digital camera, you can just take a photo instead (trust me, digital cameras are more superior when retaining art quality).

Really? I remember having an art thread where I did that but I had a terribly laggy and inefficient program for uploading the pictures so I only posted about 3. I can go dig it back up in the old I&M.

Well, I guess it could also depend on the digital camera. Most scanners I've encountered are really no good when uploading images because the resulting scan shows an upset of the white balance and the colors look rather wonky, even with black-and-white images - the digital camera I have (Lumix) allows me to adjust the white balance according to setting (ie. is the picture being taken outside, is the picture being taken in the shade, etc.), so the colors come out looking more natural in the image as it does in real life.

cheddargirl wrote:

floatingmagictree wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:

If you have a digital camera, you can just take a photo instead (trust me, digital cameras are more superior when retaining art quality).

Really? I remember having an art thread where I did that but I had a terribly laggy and inefficient program for uploading the pictures so I only posted about 3. I can go dig it back up in the old I&M.

Well, I guess it could also depend on the digital camera. Most scanners I've encountered are really no good when uploading images because the resulting scan shows an upset of the white balance and the colors look rather wonky, even with black-and-white images - the digital camera I have (Lumix) allows me to adjust the white balance according to setting (ie. is the picture being taken outside, is the picture being taken in the shade, etc.), so the colors come out looking more natural in the image as it does in real life.

I checked I&M, I just can't seem to find my old art thread. I made it almost a year ago.