Scratch

fanofcena wrote:

Brass45 wrote:

TheSaint wrote:

Brass, molecules form when the highest level electrons move up and bond with ones in the next atom.  This causes the atoms to become much more stable, which they want. However, while electrons are shared, the atoms are together. My point was you were think of the like a ball, which they are definatly not. Electrons don't even have circular orbits.

One last thing: The average nitrogen molecule in the atmosphere moves at approximatly 490 m/s. Good luck catching it. 

Nice idea though.

Thanks,I guess.So if I applied my nanobot to catch the atoms in my way,then it would probably end up as part of the nanobot. Couldn't you catch atoms with electromagnetism though? But then their would be the problem of keeping the atom stable without flying toward or away from the magnet;if the atom was spinning though,then the gyroscopic stability might keep it in place.

Actualy u can catch them using electromagnetism the same way its done is LHC or other particle colliders 

Meaning you stabilize it with multiple magnets,right?

TheSaint wrote:

Brass45 wrote:

fanofcena wrote:

Actualy u can catch them using electromagnetism the same way its done is LHC or other particle colliders 

Meaning you stabilize it with multiple magnets,right?

Yes, as long as the atom has a charge, which most do, you can keep it stable by surrounding it with the same charged atoms. If you did it with oppositly charged magnets, it would stick to your nanobot, and mostly likely react with the magnet.

Once again, good luck with that. 

Wait i got update a particle collider I forget the name uses 5.6 terra electron volts for the whole assembly that means to catch an atom your nanobot needs to be for sure NUCLEAR powerd

Actually just for electron catcher brass as most atoms are nearly neutral so they posses very low magnetic properties so for an atom catcher u will need high amount of voltage so what i say is using a nano net like the one used to make A hydrogen fuel cell is feasible