jayhawker wrote:
Mah Invisible Sword Iz Aweshume!!!!! So Beware It!!!!! Yes, You In The Corner. You Beware, Too!!!!! Mwahahahahaha!!! feel silly...
I clicked, and now i regret clicking this because you just wasted ten seconds of my life.
T-T
Last edited by ScratchX (2010-02-12 21:50:42)
Offline
ScratchX wrote:
jayhawker wrote:
Mah Invisible Sword Iz Aweshume!!!!! So Beware It!!!!! Yes, You In The Corner. You Beware, Too!!!!! Mwahahahahaha!!! feel silly...
I clicked, and now i regret clicking this because you just wasted ten seconds of my life.
T-T
It took you ten seconds to read that?
Wow.
By the way, I most first graders who can read better than this other guy my age.
Offline
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
jayhawker wrote:
Mah Invisible Sword Iz Aweshume!!!!! So Beware It!!!!! Yes, You In The Corner. You Beware, Too!!!!! Mwahahahahaha!!! feel silly...
I clicked, and now i regret clicking this because you just wasted ten seconds of my life.
T-TIt took you ten seconds to read that?
Wow.
By the way, I most first graders who can read better than this other guy my age.
2 seconds-Thinking why would anybody click this thread because it says "Click me"
.5 seconds-Thinking, "@#$% I clicked it."
.5 seconds-Thinking, "Well I better read what this guy has to say..."
3 seconds-Finish reading...
3 seconds-Thinks, "*? What a waste of time..."
1 second-Clicks report button...
Offline
ScratchX wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
I clicked, and now i regret clicking this because you just wasted ten seconds of my life.
T-TIt took you ten seconds to read that?
Wow.
By the way, I most first graders who can read better than this other guy my age.2 seconds-Thinking why would anybody click this thread because it says "Click me"
.5 seconds-Thinking, "@#$% I clicked it."
.5 seconds-Thinking, "Well I better read what this guy has to say..."
3 seconds-Finish reading...
3 seconds-Thinks, "*? What a waste of time..."
1 second-Clicks report button...
It takes you three seconds to read that?
Offline
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
It took you ten seconds to read that?
Wow.
By the way, I most first graders who can read better than this other guy my age.2 seconds-Thinking why would anybody click this thread because it says "Click me"
.5 seconds-Thinking, "@#$% I clicked it."
.5 seconds-Thinking, "Well I better read what this guy has to say..."
3 seconds-Finish reading...
3 seconds-Thinks, "*? What a waste of time..."
1 second-Clicks report button...It takes you three seconds to read that?
How long did it take you to read it...
Offline
1 second to click the link, 2 seconds to read it and all replies, 5 minutes to post with my bad internet connection.
Offline
ScratchX wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
2 seconds-Thinking why would anybody click this thread because it says "Click me"
.5 seconds-Thinking, "@#$% I clicked it."
.5 seconds-Thinking, "Well I better read what this guy has to say..."
3 seconds-Finish reading...
3 seconds-Thinks, "*? What a waste of time..."
1 second-Clicks report button...It takes you three seconds to read that?
How long did it take you to read it...
1.2 seconds; I timed it with my iPhone's stopwatch.
Second time I got .9 seconds.
Last edited by cocoanut (2010-02-12 22:00:21)
Offline
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
It takes you three seconds to read that?How long did it take you to read it...
1.2 seconds; I timed it with my iPhone's stopwatch.
Second time I got .9 seconds.
Oooh wow. Your so awesome.
Your acting like a noob now.
Offline
ScratchX wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
How long did it take you to read it...
1.2 seconds; I timed it with my iPhone's stopwatch.
Second time I got .9 seconds.Oooh wow. Your so awesome.
Aren't I? *smug grin*
Where's the noob come in?
Last edited by cocoanut (2010-02-12 22:42:28)
Offline
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
1.2 seconds; I timed it with my iPhone's stopwatch.
Second time I got .9 seconds.Oooh wow. Your so awesome.
Aren't I? *smug grin*
Where's the noob come in?
Your implying that your better then me because you read the post a couple of seconds ahead of me...
Anyways lets get back on topic shall we?
Back on topic-
se nxsmzxcmzxcm,cxvm cxjfxvjxfbvjkxfbm,sdvjnhxcmxcvujsdkfjvxsdjnczxzxc nzcn xzcn zxcn xzcxzcnxcfcvx
vc
cv
v
nvg
df
ncv
fxcgvgggbbvbvgh cxcb bvh
Last edited by ScratchX (2010-02-12 22:44:30)
Offline
ScratchX wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
Oooh wow. Your so awesome.Aren't I? *smug grin*
Where's the noob come in?
Your implying that your better then me because you read the post a couple of seconds ahead of me...
No, no, not at all. I was implying that I'm a faster reader than you. But that's not bad since three seconds is fairly fast and I'm twice your age.
Offline
cocoanut wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
Aren't I? *smug grin*
Where's the noob come in?
Your implying that your better then me because you read the post a couple of seconds ahead of me...No, no, not at all. I was implying that I'm a faster reader than you. But that's not bad since three seconds is fairly fast and I'm twice your age.
Sure...
Offline
That would mean your 30, not 32. I'm 3/5th your age though if you are 30.
Offline
This topic seems to have been unnecessarily duplicated. Please refer to the original topic here: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=325165#p325165
Offline