Scratch
archived forums
#26 2010-01-29 20:25:25
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
The-Whiz wrote:
Yeah, and the government would kill thousands of people just to make it look like some terrorists flew into a building with a plane.
You guys think it was really a government hoax? (Agreeing EXTREMELY with The-Whiz) Thousands of people were killed. And you think that someone decided just to show there was a terrorist attack ? No! Osama is a criminally insane man and he had this idea with Al-quida.
Happiness is a habit. You can help the world practice happiness a little more. Visit the 'Happiness List' below and post a list of 100 things that make you happy!
Offline
#27 2010-01-29 20:30:40
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
J0j2 wrote:
The-Whiz wrote:
Yeah, and the government would kill thousands of people just to make it look like some terrorists flew into a building with a plane.
You guys think it was really a government hoax? (Agreeing EXTREMELY with The-Whiz) Thousands of people were killed. And you think that someone decided just to show there was a terrorist attack ? No! Osama is a criminally insane man and he had this idea with Al-quida.
*Al-Queda*
And it is completely a hoax. The government blames *terrorists* for something they didn't want anyone in the US to know about.
Scratchin' since 2007
Offline
#28 2010-01-29 20:33:51
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
J0j2 wrote:
The-Whiz wrote:
Yeah, and the government would kill thousands of people just to make it look like some terrorists flew into a building with a plane.
You guys think it was really a government hoax? (Agreeing EXTREMELY with The-Whiz) Thousands of people were killed. And you think that someone decided just to show there was a terrorist attack ? No! Osama is a criminally insane man and he had this idea with Al-quida.
It was said that Osama planed this EXACT date because the USA's emergency number was 911. Did you guys know that on that day George Bush(The current President) was out of the White House the WHOLE day? There is a theory that Osama told Bush that he was going to crash planes into buildings. And Bush asked for the date and Osama told him September 9th. So on September 9th, Bush went out of the White House. Why? To hide...
Happy New Year!
Offline
#29 2010-01-29 20:35:42
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
adriangl wrote:
J0j2 wrote:
The-Whiz wrote:
Yeah, and the government would kill thousands of people just to make it look like some terrorists flew into a building with a plane.
You guys think it was really a government hoax? (Agreeing EXTREMELY with The-Whiz) Thousands of people were killed. And you think that someone decided just to show there was a terrorist attack ? No! Osama is a criminally insane man and he had this idea with Al-quida.
*Al-Queda*
And it is completely a hoax. The government blames *terrorists* for something they didn't want anyone in the US to know about.
But why would the US decide to kill hundreds of people, and destroy an important building, just to blame terrorists for it?
Offline
#30 2010-01-29 20:41:21
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
BWOG wrote:
adriangl wrote:
J0j2 wrote:
You guys think it was really a government hoax? (Agreeing EXTREMELY with The-Whiz) Thousands of people were killed. And you think that someone decided just to show there was a terrorist attack ? No! Osama is a criminally insane man and he had this idea with Al-quida.*Al-Queda*
And it is completely a hoax. The government blames *terrorists* for something they didn't want anyone in the US to know about.But why would the US decide to kill hundreds of people, and destroy an important building, just to blame terrorists for it?
No, I am not saying that. I am saying that something else happened, something that would make the government look stupid(even more than they already are). Like an accident or something, something that they had to cover up. Maybe a pilot who was drunk or made a mistake. Something like that.
Scratchin' since 2007
Offline
#31 2010-01-30 03:26:39
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
And there's the thing with the pentagon hit. We have hole in the wall, hang on, Where is the plane? It couldn't melt, because the temperature was too low. Where the heck are bodies from the plane, pieces of luggage, tyres? If you think about it, you realize there is a lot missing. Besides, is it the first time when a country kills its citizens to achieve some goals? Read the US Anti-Terrorism Act summary.
And there is also the case of the recent failed attack which banned liquids from the personal safety check. Why would they do that? Airlines make more money. Airlines and duty-free shops.
Converting my Scratch projects to Python!
Offline
#32 2010-01-30 06:04:27
- MyRedNeptune
- Community Moderator
- Registered: 2007-05-07
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
BWOG wrote:
adriangl wrote:
J0j2 wrote:
You guys think it was really a government hoax? (Agreeing EXTREMELY with The-Whiz) Thousands of people were killed. And you think that someone decided just to show there was a terrorist attack ? No! Osama is a criminally insane man and he had this idea with Al-quida.
*Al-Queda*
And it is completely a hoax. The government blames *terrorists* for something they didn't want anyone in the US to know about.But why would the US decide to kill hundreds of people, and destroy an important building, just to blame terrorists for it?
Well, that incident was economically advantageous for the US. So that gives the peeps a reason to suspect that the government knew about the attack but didn't do anything to prevent it.... there. ^^
Btw.......... WTC. *,* I've heard somewhere that this is the 9/11 was a Hoax club. Is there an Idolize the WTC club here?.................. anyone?.... D:
I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>Offline
#34 2010-01-30 07:14:44
- MyRedNeptune
- Community Moderator
- Registered: 2007-05-07
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
filo5 wrote:
I'm afraid there's not WTC fan club...
T^T
I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>Offline
#36 2010-01-30 09:16:19
- Paddle2See
- Scratch Team
- Registered: 2007-10-27
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
Say Ace-of-Spades...I hate to ask, but are you checking your Scratch messages on a regular basis? I'd kind of like to know.
Offline
#37 2010-01-30 09:26:33
- MyRedNeptune
- Community Moderator
- Registered: 2007-05-07
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
BWOG wrote:
MyRedNeptune wrote:
filo5 wrote:
I'm afraid there's not WTC fan club...
T^T
T to the Tth power?
Eh? It's a crying expression smiley. :-P
I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>Offline
#38 2010-01-30 09:31:23
- steppenwulf
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-23
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
BWOG wrote:
adriangl wrote:
J0j2 wrote:
You guys think it was really a government hoax? (Agreeing EXTREMELY with The-Whiz) Thousands of people were killed. And you think that someone decided just to show there was a terrorist attack ? No! Osama is a criminally insane man and he had this idea with Al-quida.*Al-Queda*
And it is completely a hoax. The government blames *terrorists* for something they didn't want anyone in the US to know about.But why would the US decide to kill hundreds of people, and destroy an important building, just to blame terrorists for it?
It's a complicated answer, but here is my short summary: war purposes. As we all know, "Dubya" ws one of the worst presidents in U.S history. I suspect he wanted U.S citizens to be furious at the "Middle East terrorists" and gain enough sympathy so he could launch a huge war campaign in the Mid-East without people getting mad at him.
I'm graduating HS this April and going to college in the Fall.
Offline
#39 2010-01-30 09:38:11
- littletonkslover
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2008-12-12
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
BWOG wrote:
MyRedNeptune wrote:
filo5 wrote:
I'm afraid there's not WTC fan club...
T^T
T to the Tth power?
lawls 
Anyways, I still think the government didn't really know about it.
That's the dark nature of capitalism. ~ Wonder Showzen
Offline
#40 2010-01-30 09:51:13
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
adriangl wrote:
No, I am not saying that. I am saying that something else happened, something that would make the government look stupid(even more than they already are). Like an accident or something, something that they had to cover up. Maybe a pilot who was drunk or made a mistake. Something like that.
WHAT!?! I can’t believe my eyes! You honestly think that two plains could randomly crash straight into two very important building on the same day within the same hour because they both where controlled by drunk pilots!? And even if that virtually impossible accident was the case, why in the world would the government try to cover it up? Come on! It was a clear act of terrorism.
Last edited by DavidTy (2010-01-30 09:52:11)
Offline
#41 2010-01-30 09:54:05
- littletonkslover
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2008-12-12
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
If I said the government has major problems would I be called an anarchist?
That's the dark nature of capitalism. ~ Wonder Showzen
Offline
#42 2010-01-30 10:35:57
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
DavidTy wrote:
adriangl wrote:
No, I am not saying that. I am saying that something else happened, something that would make the government look stupid(even more than they already are). Like an accident or something, something that they had to cover up. Maybe a pilot who was drunk or made a mistake. Something like that.
WHAT!?! I can’t believe my eyes! You honestly think that two plains could randomly crash straight into two very important building on the same day within the same hour because they both where controlled by drunk pilots!? And even if that virtually impossible accident was the case, why in the world would the government try to cover it up? Come on! It was a clear act of terrorism.
Are you kidding me? I saw smoke...smoke burst out of the building. It didn't collapse which is definitely what it would do if a plane crashed into it. Looking at that I see a bomb could have made that explosion. A bomb on the inside of the building...a bomb that the government wouldn't want people to know about.
Scratchin' since 2007
Offline
#43 2010-01-30 11:08:22
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
Okay, I watched a new video, here are some things: The Pentagon had a hole in its wall, but there was no plane. 1 of the planes really seemed like a missile, not a plane. And one plane was heading for an area, when it exploded in that area...from the inside. There wasn't a missile or anything, it definitely exploded from the inside. There was very little video of any of this, it was all the same footage. The bad footage shows one unclear thing, a plane that went through the building and exploded at the other end.
Scratchin' since 2007
Offline
#44 2010-01-30 11:21:50
- RHY3756547
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-08-15
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
Simulation:
http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=h3tBXI2yLvs&NR=1
Offline
#45 2010-01-30 11:32:21
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … re=related Proof of bombs and explosives in the building
Scratchin' since 2007
Offline
#46 2010-01-30 11:46:49
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … re=related Proof that Bush lied and knew something about this
See, I can go all day if I have to
Scratchin' since 2007
Offline
#48 2010-01-30 11:57:33
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
BWOG wrote:
I still don't get the whole point of having people die just to blame other people. Also, explain the plane shaped hole in the first tower that got hit.
I'll explain it in one word: bomb. There is proof that there were bombs in the building that exploded and that George Bush lied and said that he saw the first hit on TV, even though the first hit was only released the day after 9/11. He was in a classroom in Florida...hiding. I think he knew.
Scratchin' since 2007
Offline
#49 2010-01-30 11:59:10
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
adriangl wrote:
Are you kidding me? I saw smoke...smoke burst out of the building.
Well duh, a Boeing 767 jetliner just plowed into it.
adriangl wrote:
It didn't collapse which is definitely what it would do if a plane crashed into it.
Yes, both of the world trade center buildings collapse within two hours upon impact.
adriangl wrote:
Looking at that I see a bomb could have made that explosion. A bomb on the inside of the building...a bomb that the government wouldn't want people to know about.
Yes a bomb could have made an explosion like that, but it didn't, 23,500 galloons of jet fuel did.
Last edited by DavidTy (2010-01-30 12:00:33)
Offline
#50 2010-01-30 12:08:58
- CheeseMunchy
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2008-10-13
- Posts: 1000+
Re: The Twin Towers (9/11) Discussion Thread
DavidTy wrote:
adriangl wrote:
Are you kidding me? I saw smoke...smoke burst out of the building.
Well duh, a Boeing 767 jetliner just plowed into it.
adriangl wrote:
It didn't collapse which is definitely what it would do if a plane crashed into it.
Yes, both of the world trade center buildings collapse within two hours upon impact.
adriangl wrote:
Looking at that I see a bomb could have made that explosion. A bomb on the inside of the building...a bomb that the government wouldn't want people to know about.
Yes a bomb could have made an explosion like that, but it didn't, 23,500 galloons of jet fuel did.
I agree.
6418,
Offline