illusionist wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
The 5th dimension? Now that's a load. Where's the scientific evidence that any of these extra dimensions exist?
Right now, there is a 2D shape complaining about the 3rd dimension.
![]()
You mean 4th lol
I just typed a paragraph and the stupid server froze and I lost the message
The rules of the internet:Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
The 5th dimension? Now that's a load. Where's the scientific evidence that any of these extra dimensions exist?
Look at the link to 2 youtube videos I posted at the end of the first page. Its part 1 and 2. It explains about 11 dimensions.
That's just dumb. I need real scientific proof.
Offline
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Lucario621 wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
The 5th dimension? Now that's a load. Where's the scientific evidence that any of these extra dimensions exist?
Look at the link to 2 youtube videos I posted at the end of the first page. Its part 1 and 2. It explains about 11 dimensions.
That's just dumb. I need real scientific proof.
Its always dumb if you don't believe in it...
Offline
Must.. resist.. urge.. for... insulting... retort.... (You made it way too easy with that last post)
Offline
Mr_X wrote:
Blade just emailed this to me on live
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/7402/lmaox.png
He used my 3D snake pic
Exactly my point!
Offline
Mr_X wrote:
Blade just emailed this to me on live
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/7402/lmaox.png
He used my 3D snake pic
Ahahaha Flatland.
That line king thought there was only a line of existence. And the circles thought there was only Flatland.
Ergo, there are a billion million dimensions, we just have no idea about them.
Oh yeah, quick question/point/related discussion topic:
In Flatland, the residents saw in 1D (a line), the Lineland King saw in 0D (a point), and the sphere allowed the Square to see in 2D (a plane).
We have two eyes, and therefore see in a sense of 3D. Does this mean our brains process in 4D?
No, wait, I have another one:
As the sphere passed through Flatland, he was a line that became bigger than shrunk to nothing. What would someone passing in 4D through a 3D area look like?

Offline
illusionist wrote:
NASA wrote:
If a light is shone on a three dimensional object, a two-dimensional shadow is cast. By dimensional analogy, light shone on a two-dimensional object in a two-dimensional world would cast a one-dimensional shadow, and light on a one-dimensional object in a one-dimensional world would cast a zero-dimensional shadow, that is, a point of non-light. Going the other way, one may infer that light shone on a four-dimensional object in a four-dimensional world would cast a three-dimensional shadow.
What could cast a 3D shadow? Discuss.
Here is a Tesseract
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … simple.gif
Thats what the idea is of the 3d viewer (or tv whatever u say)
Offline
Technically speaking, if a 4D object is built, and it casts a 3D shadow, in our dimension it would be a real object rather than a shadow that we could step on.
For those who can't understand this, think kingdom hearts. Think of the heartless. They are shadows; 3D shadows
Offline
BWOG wrote:
3D shadows? How is that even possible?
Take a photo while leaving the lense open for a little longer. This captures the 4th dimention time. Shadows will be in 3D.(If they moved a little)
Last edited by what-the (2010-01-29 09:08:05)
My site Offline
In physics and mathematics, a sequence of n numbers can be understood as a location in an n-dimensional space. When n = 4, the set of all such locations is called 4-dimensional Euclidean space.
Offline
Actually, Time is not a dimension. Dimension is a measurement of space. Time is not space, and you can't see the back of your head (except in very small universes). Anyway, I think that better understanding of dimensions higher than our (3D) may help us beat the speed of light barrier (purely hypothetical hyperspace).
Offline
I do not think that anything could cast a 3D shadow...
A shadow is simply like an are where the light does not reach, because something is in the way. And the 4th Dimension is time.
Offline
It's all garbage. A billion million universes? That's wrong. Where's the real proof that these dimensions exist?
Offline

This is an impossible tesseract. Impossible in real life.

Offline
NASA wrote:
The fourth dimension is not time, it is duration; and all of the points between the location of one form to a future location.
Offline
Mr_X wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
The 5th dimension? Now that's a load. Where's the scientific evidence that any of these extra dimensions exist?
Right now, there is a 2D shape complaining about the 3rd dimension.
![]()
You mean 4th lol
I just typed a paragraph and the stupid server froze and I lost the message
No, he means 5th.....
Offline
filo5 wrote:
Actually, Time is not a dimension. Dimension is a measurement of space. Time is not space, and you can't see the back of your head (except in very small universes). Anyway, I think that better understanding of dimensions higher than our (3D) may help us beat the speed of light barrier (purely hypothetical hyperspace).
Time is a dimension, just it is not a spacial dimension.
Offline
Actually, duration or time can't be represented as a dimension, rather as something that holds dimensions together. For something to exist, it has to have its position in multi-dimensional space and time.
Offline
filo5 wrote:
Actually, duration or time can't be represented as a dimension, rather as something that holds dimensions together. For something to exist, it has to have its position in multi-dimensional space and time.
It has position; it is EVERY position between were an object is and where it will be.
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
Look at these two videos, explaining the dimensions.
http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=JkxieS-6WuA
http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=ySBaYMESb8o
I saw those. They aren't confusing like Wikipedia.
Offline