cds56 wrote:
Meh, I say we just ask the scratch team to rename it.
I don't think we have enough of a history to do that yet..
What do you mean?
cds56 wrote:
I don't think we have enough of a history to do that yet
Offline
Well link to it in the new thread?
Offline
*eats chips and has soda while you guys argue about making a new thread or renaming this one*
Offline
Just ask a moderator to rename it...
Offline
Thats what we're arguing about. Weather to re-name, or make a new one.
Offline
Mr_X wrote:
Magnie's a guy?
He says he is.
Offline
filo5 wrote:
*bump*
wow... we actualy needed to bump this? What about re-name and sticky? that would be good since this is supposed to be a text-version of Scratch
Offline
filo5 wrote:
yes, we actually needed to bump this. And actually, I don't think much is happening rite nao.
Agreed.
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
filo5 wrote:
*bump*
wow... we actualy needed to bump this? What about re-name and sticky? that would be good since this is supposed to be a text-version of Scratch
Sticky when it's done, if ever...
Offline
gershmer wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
filo5 wrote:
*bump*
wow... we actualy needed to bump this? What about re-name and sticky? that would be good since this is supposed to be a text-version of Scratch
Sticky when it's done, if ever...
Hopefuly...
Offline
Mr_X: Yes, I am a boy. o.O
Offline
filo5 wrote:
When we release a version capable of Scratch 1.1, probably
scratch 1.1?
Offline
filo5 wrote:
yes. when we reach the stage when M3OW can do everything as well as Scratch 1.1, we can call it success.
Ah... i understand now.
posted from homemade webbrowser made in c#
im learning, if something doesn't work, delete it and do it again!
Offline
filo5 wrote:
yes. when we reach the stage when M3OW can do everything as well as Scratch 1.1, we can call it success.
that would take a LONG time.
Offline