This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#26 2010-01-10 14:32:29

illusionist
Retired Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

MyRedNeptune wrote:

cocoanut wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:


Well, the thing is, that "cool" style you have there is generally overused. It's not effective anymore and it looks kinda cheap. >.>

Also, good design doesn't equal the most hardcore font and colors. Designers love simple characters. ^^ Your old signature has that.

He also made it at cooltext.com, I'm thinking.  tongue

O rly. >.> It doesn't look like Cooltext.

Anyways, here's the full size sig:

http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww97 … nist-1.png

Or resized to fit Scratch:

http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww97 … mall-1.png

Lol. I hate black signatures but I guessed you wanted it "cool". xD So there's also bit of geometry. :3 Oh, you can also use this version with a thicker outline:

http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww97 … mall-2.png


Or, if you want a stronger blue tint:

http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww97 … small1.png

http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww97 … 1263151724

Thanks MRN! I'll add it to my list...


http://i.imgur.com/8LX1NrV.png

Offline

 

#27 2010-01-10 14:36:11

MyRedNeptune
Community Moderator
Registered: 2007-05-07
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

illusionist wrote:

Thanks MRN! I'll add it to my list...

Welcumez. ^^


http://i52.tinypic.com/5es7t0.png I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>

Offline

 

#28 2010-01-10 14:37:33

cocoanut
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-10
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

MyRedNeptune wrote:

cocoanut wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

Well, the thing is, that "cool" style you have there is generally overused. It's not effective anymore and it looks kinda cheap. >.>

Also, good design doesn't equal the most hardcore font and colors. Designers love simple characters. ^^ Your old signature has that.

He also made it at cooltext.com, I'm thinking.  tongue

O rly. >.> It doesn't look like Cooltext.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/DamnThoseWiffyDogs/Rs9ZUEA8r1I/AAAAAAAAAOc/BF2BE3SL4Iw/QuiteRly.jpg
Yeah. Look what I can do with cooltext:
http://i49.tinypic.com/29wa977.jpg
May not be the same font, but looks awfully similar.

Last edited by cocoanut (2010-01-10 14:38:55)


http://i42.tinypic.com/20gyvif.jpgPlease leave a message at the beep.
Steam: Hellephant

Offline

 

#29 2010-01-10 14:40:13

illusionist
Retired Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

cocoanut wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

cocoanut wrote:


He also made it at cooltext.com, I'm thinking.  tongue

O rly. >.> It doesn't look like Cooltext.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/DamnThoseWiffyDogs … iteRly.jpg
Yeah. Look what I can do with cooltext:
http://i49.tinypic.com/29wa977.jpg
May not be the same font, but looks awfully similar.

THE TRUTH!!!

FIRST I used cooltext, and produced the very same effect you just did.

THEN I enhanced the color a bit with GIMP.

___________________

ok ok


http://i.imgur.com/8LX1NrV.png

Offline

 

#30 2010-01-10 14:59:56

MyRedNeptune
Community Moderator
Registered: 2007-05-07
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

cocoanut wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

cocoanut wrote:


He also made it at cooltext.com, I'm thinking.  tongue

O rly. >.> It doesn't look like Cooltext.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/DamnThoseWiffyDogs … iteRly.jpg
Yeah. Look what I can do with cooltext:
http://i49.tinypic.com/29wa977.jpg
May not be the same font, but looks awfully similar.

Oh, I thought you were talking about the new ones. xP


http://i52.tinypic.com/5es7t0.png I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>

Offline

 

#31 2010-01-10 15:15:22

Morphed
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-09
Posts: 89

Re: New Sig bleh :P

Number one is my fav, but maybe thats just because I've seen it most.  tongue

If not one...I would say #3.  cool


http://scratch.mit.edu/static/icons/buddy/435431_med.png?t=2010-01-24+19%3A31%3A51 "A bird In the hand is better than above you."
Wowie. Econimy go boom daddy....

Offline

 

#32 2010-01-10 15:16:37

Morphed
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-09
Posts: 89

Re: New Sig bleh :P

big_smile  Forgot to say.....

Cooltext is awesome!


http://scratch.mit.edu/static/icons/buddy/435431_med.png?t=2010-01-24+19%3A31%3A51 "A bird In the hand is better than above you."
Wowie. Econimy go boom daddy....

Offline

 

#33 2010-01-10 15:16:47

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

The one you are using right now is nice  big_smile


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#34 2010-01-10 15:26:08

FantasyTales
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-06-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

#2 Ftw!


http://ageofthefuture.ismywebsite.com/images/dg_sig_2_small.png
http://images.myadoptables.com/adopted/2340.pnghttp://images.myadoptables.com/adopted/2339.png

Offline

 

#35 2010-01-10 16:23:54

jacool
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

I like the on MRN made, but it looks a little bit too 'complicated' with all those lines sticking out  hmm


http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss159/JacobKar/svensktiger-1.png

Offline

 

#36 2010-01-10 16:49:45

MyRedNeptune
Community Moderator
Registered: 2007-05-07
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

jacool wrote:

I like the on MRN made, but it looks a little bit too 'complicated' with all those lines sticking out  hmm

Anything "cool" looks weird in my eyes. :-D But the composition is a LOT better than in the other ones.. o.o and it was made to be flashy.... I can see that Illusionist likes flashy...


http://i52.tinypic.com/5es7t0.png I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>

Offline

 

#37 2010-01-10 16:50:58

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:

I like the on MRN made, but it looks a little bit too 'complicated' with all those lines sticking out  hmm

Anything "cool" looks weird in my eyes. :-D But the composition is a LOT better than in the other ones.. o.o

I liked yours  big_smile


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#38 2010-01-10 16:56:21

jacool
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:

I like the on MRN made, but it looks a little bit too 'complicated' with all those lines sticking out  hmm

Anything "cool" looks weird in my eyes. :-D But the composition is a LOT better than in the other ones.. o.o and it was made to be flashy.... I can see that Illusionist likes flashy...

Oh, okay  smile
Despite the lines it looked good, did you use Photoshop? Paint.NET? GIMP? Ms Paint?
Lol xD

Last edited by jacool (2010-01-10 16:56:33)


http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss159/JacobKar/svensktiger-1.png

Offline

 

#39 2010-01-10 17:02:43

MyRedNeptune
Community Moderator
Registered: 2007-05-07
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

jacool wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:

I like the on MRN made, but it looks a little bit too 'complicated' with all those lines sticking out  hmm

Anything "cool" looks weird in my eyes. :-D But the composition is a LOT better than in the other ones.. o.o and it was made to be flashy.... I can see that Illusionist likes flashy...

Oh, okay  smile
Despite the lines it looked good, did you use Photoshop? Paint.NET? GIMP? Ms Paint?
Lol xD

Paint.NET, as usual, meh. xD


http://i52.tinypic.com/5es7t0.png I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>

Offline

 

#40 2010-01-10 17:06:52

adriangl
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:


Anything "cool" looks weird in my eyes. :-D But the composition is a LOT better than in the other ones.. o.o and it was made to be flashy.... I can see that Illusionist likes flashy...

Oh, okay  smile
Despite the lines it looked good, did you use Photoshop? Paint.NET? GIMP? Ms Paint?
Lol xD

Paint.NET, as usual, meh. xD

Really? Eh-I am really bad with it, I am used to Gimp.


Scratchin' since 2007

Offline

 

#41 2010-01-10 17:07:26

jacool
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:


Anything "cool" looks weird in my eyes. :-D But the composition is a LOT better than in the other ones.. o.o and it was made to be flashy.... I can see that Illusionist likes flashy...

Oh, okay  smile
Despite the lines it looked good, did you use Photoshop? Paint.NET? GIMP? Ms Paint?
Lol xD

Paint.NET, as usual, meh. xD

smile
I used Paint.NET for my signature image too, what do you think of it?
I tried to make the text look a little ghosty (is that a word?).


http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss159/JacobKar/svensktiger-1.png

Offline

 

#42 2010-01-10 17:26:02

MyRedNeptune
Community Moderator
Registered: 2007-05-07
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

jacool wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:


Oh, okay  smile
Despite the lines it looked good, did you use Photoshop? Paint.NET? GIMP? Ms Paint?
Lol xD

Paint.NET, as usual, meh. xD

smile
I used Paint.NET for my signature image too, what do you think of it?
I tried to make the text look a little ghosty (is that a word?).

Ghostly? It looks simply transparent. Have you tried applying blurs? :-D


http://i52.tinypic.com/5es7t0.png I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>

Offline

 

#43 2010-01-10 17:31:10

jacool
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

Paint.NET, as usual, meh. xD

smile
I used Paint.NET for my signature image too, what do you think of it?
I tried to make the text look a little ghosty (is that a word?).

Ghostly? It looks simply transparent. Have you tried applying blurs? :-D

Hmm.... True.
Like this:
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss159/JacobKar/jacoolsig1.png

Or

http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss159/JacobKar/jacoolsig2.png


http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss159/JacobKar/svensktiger-1.png

Offline

 

#44 2010-01-10 17:32:10

Mr_X
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-09-10
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

2 and 3 look cool
How did you made them?
Sorry if it's been said already, but I didn't read the whole topic


http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/8656/exveemonc.gif The rules of the internet:
1) Every woman is a man    2) Every man is a child    3) Every child is an FBI agent                                        I have psychopathic tendencies. Be afraid

Offline

 

#45 2010-01-10 17:54:37

MyRedNeptune
Community Moderator
Registered: 2007-05-07
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

jacool wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:


smile
I used Paint.NET for my signature image too, what do you think of it?
I tried to make the text look a little ghosty (is that a word?).

Ghostly? It looks simply transparent. Have you tried applying blurs? :-D

Hmm.... True.
Like this:
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss15 … olsig1.png

Or

http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss15 … olsig2.png

That's too blurry...... try adding a glow to the original, or experimenting with blending the original and blurry, or adding a glow to the blurry, or all of the above. xP


http://i52.tinypic.com/5es7t0.png I know what you're thinking! "Neptune! Get rid of those filthy advertisements and give us back the Zarathustra siggy, you horrible person!" Well, don't worry about it, the Zara siggy will be back soon, new and improved! ^^ Meanwhile, just do what the sig tells you to. >.>

Offline

 

#46 2010-01-10 18:06:22

RHY3756547
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-08-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

MyRedNeptune wrote:

jacool wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:


Ghostly? It looks simply transparent. Have you tried applying blurs? :-D

Hmm.... True.
Like this:
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss15 … olsig1.png

Or

http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss15 … olsig2.png

That's too blurry...... try adding a glow to the original, or experimenting with blending the original and blurry, or adding a glow to the blurry, or all of the above. xP

You should anti-alias the text (smooth edges), duplicate it, blur the duplicate and make it transparant.

Offline

 

#47 2010-01-11 11:05:48

jacool
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: New Sig bleh :P

Thanks for the tips MRN and RHY, unfortunately school starts tomorrow, and I won't be on Scratch except for on the holidays. So there's really no point for me to change my signature now. But I'll keep in mind what you said  smile


http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss159/JacobKar/svensktiger-1.png

Offline

 

Board footer