technoman wrote:
Just get Safari 4. The fastest web browser with best features.
LIES
cocoanut wrote:
Bah, I have windows 1.0 (There is such a thing.)
Here's a screenshot:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4e/Windows1.0.png
Works real nicely, actually.
I thought you had ubuntu?
Offline
floatingmagictree wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
Bah, I have windows 1.0 (There is such a thing.)
Here's a screenshot:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4e/Windows1.0.png
Works real nicely, actually.I thought you had ubuntu?
That's on my other computer....
Offline
cocoanut wrote:
floatingmagictree wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
Bah, I have windows 1.0 (There is such a thing.)
Here's a screenshot:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4e/Windows1.0.png
Works real nicely, actually.I thought you had ubuntu?
That's on my other computer....
Ohhhhhh. Windows 1 looks kinda.... advanced for something that came out in the 20th century.
Offline
BWOG wrote:
RHY3756547 wrote:
BWOG wrote:
Why don't you buy a 95 for $50?Too expensive, of course. Here in Britain everything is 200000X more expensive (that's just about right anyways)
Wrong. It's like 2x more expensive at most. You have Scratch 1.4, and Windows 3.1 can't run 1.4, or even Scratch 1.1, so you don't have 3.1.
Windows 3.1 can run EVERYTHING.
Offline
gershmer wrote:
Lucario621 wrote:
-Theres a spell-checker
Firefox detects words spelled wrong also...
Yeah, but I'm just comparing it to IE8 which I previously had.
Offline
RHY3756547 wrote:
BWOG wrote:
RHY3756547 wrote:
Too expensive, of course. Here in Britain everything is 200000X more expensive (that's just about right anyways)Wrong. It's like 2x more expensive at most. You have Scratch 1.4, and Windows 3.1 can't run 1.4, or even Scratch 1.1, so you don't have 3.1.
Windows 3.1 can run EVERYTHING.
Nope xD 16-bit
Offline
For some reason, chrome loads slower than Fire Fox, so I just use Fire Fox.
Offline
BWOG wrote:
RHY3756547 wrote:
Lucario621 wrote:
Well duh, of course it doesn't work with Windows 98 XDHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
No.
By the way, I use Windows 1.4lol Scratching too much?
ROFLMAO
I use Firefox. IE fails
Offline
iCode-747 wrote:
This is what's weird on my computer: JAVA DOSN'T WOPRK!!!!! ON CHROME
SO I CAN'T WATCH SCRATCH!!
Same here, so that's another reason I use Fire Fox.
Offline
JSO wrote:
RHY3756547 wrote:
BWOG wrote:
Wrong. It's like 2x more expensive at most. You have Scratch 1.4, and Windows 3.1 can't run 1.4, or even Scratch 1.1, so you don't have 3.1.
Windows 3.1 can run EVERYTHING.
Nope xD 16-bit
Aha - but you can easily emulate 16-bit. (See 32-bit N64 emulators)
Offline