Well, to copyright something you have to apply to a copyright company, you have to pay a small fee and they copyright it for you. However, they have to think that it's worth copyrighting... and in the case of your username, I doubt they would think that.
Also, it has to be one of these things:
Literary
song lyrics, manuscripts, manuals, computer programs, commercial documents, leaflets, newsletters & articles etc.
Dramatic
plays, dance, etc.
Musical
recordings and score.
Artistic
photography, painting, sculptures, architecture, technical drawings/diagrams, maps, logos.
Typographical arrangement of published editions
magazines, periodicals, etc.
Sound recording
may be recordings of other copyright works, e.g. musical and literary.
Films
broadcasts and cable programmes.
Last edited by WeirdF (2010-01-04 07:47:17)
Offline
j-max04 wrote:
Well is it?
(note: I mostly just want to copyright my username)
You are probably wanting to Trademark your name, not copyright it.
Here is some information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark
Offline
Yeah, I don't want anyone to use my username. I made it up, but I've noticed 1-3 websites that have taken it already.
I can name 2 right now.
( Neopets and DeviantArt )
Offline
Magnie wrote:
Yeah, I don't want anyone to use my username.
I made it up, but I've noticed 1-3 websites that have taken it already.
I can name 2 right now.
( Neopets and DeviantArt )
Yeah... On most sites I will get to be illusionist, but sometimes i'll have to add a 98 (my birthyear)
Offline
WeirdF wrote:
Well, to copyright something you have to apply to a copyright company, you have to pay a small fee and they copyright it for you.
How much of a fee.
Offline
WeirdF wrote:
Well, to copyright something you have to apply to a copyright company, you have to pay a small fee and they copyright it for you. However, they have to think that it's worth copyrighting... and in the case of your username, I doubt they would think that.
Also, it has to be one of these things:
Literary
song lyrics, manuscripts, manuals, computer programs, commercial documents, leaflets, newsletters & articles etc.
Dramatic
plays, dance, etc.
Musical
recordings and score.
Artistic
photography, painting, sculptures, architecture, technical drawings/diagrams, maps, logos.
Typographical arrangement of published editions
magazines, periodicals, etc.
Sound recording
may be recordings of other copyright works, e.g. musical and literary.
Films
broadcasts and cable programmes.
This is wrong. To copyright something, you just have to say "This is copyright (c) My Name 2010" and it's copyrighted. Might want to mail it to yourself on the day that you write that, though, so that the post office has records of it, usable in court (sorta... It's called a Poor Man's Copyright, which doesn't always work, so see the Wikipedia Page for more details).
Trademarking, however, isn't so easy, which is what you'd need to do with your username. I don't think it a good idea to trademark a username, for more than one reason, but to trademark something you have to submit an application to the US Patent & Trademark office. More info can be found here:
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/index.jsp
Not worth it, eh?
EDIT: apparently you don't need to register a trademark. Still, I don't think it a good idea to trademark a username. What if there is a user who already has a username like that? The chances are simply too high that somebody will register a username. If somebody or something or a company already has that name, they might sue you for claiming it is yours. There's more than one thing wrong. My advice: don't trademark a username.
Last edited by coolstuff (2010-01-05 20:29:24)
Offline
j-max04 wrote:
Im sorry, does anyone know how to In australia
Same way. As I said before, you don't need to apply for the trademark office, you just have to say it's trademarked. Really don't think it's a good idea, though.
Offline
you can copyright it if you have the money, but if it's a project, it would go against scratch's copy-copyright thing i think. i'm not really sure though, can someone clear this up for me? it's confusing.
Offline
everythingRhymes wrote:
you can copyright it if you have the money, but if it's a project, it would go against scratch's copy-copyright thing i think. i'm not really sure though, can someone clear this up for me? it's confusing.
With regards to to Scratch projects and copyright:
Yes, the Scratch website allows for remixing of projects; when you put the project onto the Scratch website, you allow other Scratchers to remix your project.
It might help if you have a better idea of what underlies this remix idea on the Scratch website: by default, Scratch puts a Creative Commons license on each project uploaded onto the Scratch website, which allows any Scratcher to use any part of the project so long as they follow the terms of that license and the website's Terms of Use. The license is the same for each project and a link to information on that license is provided on each project page.
However, it's not to say that a Creative Commons license forces someone to give up their copyright. Under any Creative Commons license, a user is able to keep his/her copyright while allowing others to use his/her work provided they give credit and follow the given terms of that license; thus, under the Creative Commons license that the Scratch website uses, a Scratcher is able to keep his/her copyright but allows other Scratchers to remix the work provided they give credit and follow the terms of the given Creative Commons license. (You can see part of this take effect in the case of remixed projects, in which credit is given to the original projects and its owner). If you find something that violates this (such as a project in which a Scratchers takes images from someone else and claim to have designed the said images), you can always flag the project and the Scratch Team can look into it.
If the aim in copyrighting a project is to prevent other Scratchers from completely accessing and using your projects (something which, if I'm not mistaken, goes against Scratch's idea of sharing ideas), then you're thinking in the wrong direction. Really, the only surefire way to prevent other Scratchers from accessing and using your project is to, well, not upload projects to the Scratch website in the first place.
As for regards for the issue of money and copyright:
In countries where the Berne convention is accepted, copyright is automatic - technically, then, there's no need to spend money on registering the copyright and the work holder is able to exercise his/her copyright. Spending money for copyright registration just helps to give your copyright fangs in a legal dispute should it occur. :3 Of course, here it may be better to seek the advice of a lawyer or someone familiar with copyright law due to variations in copyright law among different countries.
Last edited by cheddargirl (2010-01-06 18:51:12)
Offline
I don't really understand. Let's say I were to make a stickman, and a highly recognizable one at that, and I lived in a country that is under the Berne Convention. Would this character automatically be copyrighted to myself?
Offline
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
I don't really understand. Let's say I were to make a stickman, and a highly recognizable one at that, and I lived in a country that is under the Berne Convention. Would this character automatically be copyrighted to myself?
There's a line between something that you've copyrighted and something that you've made. A stickman might be copyrighted, but only if it's your stickman, e.g. it has 12 legs and 56 eyes. Then in court you could say "my stickman had 12 legs and 56 eyes and so did his thus he is plagiarizing." If you copyright something like a normal, recognizable stickman, it won't hold up in court and the person who made another stickman would probably not take it down upon the copyright holder's request. Court is fair (usually) and will draw the line between what is right and what isn't.
Offline
No, easily recognizable means that it can be recognized as created by me, all over.
If I supposedly made said stickman, what would I need to do for it to be recognized as my copyright?
Offline
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
No, easily recognizable means that it can be recognized as created by me, all over.
If I supposedly made said stickman, what would I need to do for it to be recognized as my copyright?
Just say "This stickman is copyright (c) 2009 Ace-Of-Spades" so long as it's specifically yours.
Offline