It should understand it with punctuation, and without punctuation.
Offline
I'll try something later, I have an idea of how "You're ___" will be able to read with punctuation, and without. ATM I can't but later this afternoon...
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
I'll try something later, I have an idea of how "You're ___" will be able to read with punctuation, and without. ATM I can't but later this afternoon...
Okay. What to do now? You and The-Whiz are working on adding more commands, RHY is working on a selection menu, pinochio is working on mood swings, is there anything that you are not doing?
Offline
Lanie wrote:
TheSaint wrote:
Woah, your back!
yup im back ^_^ still have school work so i will pop up on and off during the week hopefully I can create a project
You popped up again! Well, it's nice to see you again.
Offline
Guys - We are NOT adding commands yet. We will allow adding possibilities for the Complementary and Derogatory lists, and we can add additional responses to the current questions, but other than that DO NOT ADD ANY COMMANDS. We can do that second to last, before the lag reducing stage.
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
Guys - We are NOT adding commands yet. We will allow adding possibilities for the Complementary and Derogatory lists, and we can add additional responses to the current questions, but other than that DO NOT ADD ANY COMMANDS. We can do that second to last, before the lag reducing stage.
That sounds like a good plan. Before anything we have to think of a way for the current commands to get a response faster.
Offline
I really think if you understanded the code, then you'd understand where the project needs to go, and you'd know whats possible and what's [i]NOT[i/]
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
I really think if you understanded the code, then you'd understand where the project needs to go, and you'd know whats possible and what's [i]NOT[i/]
I understand fully, I am just saying that we need t make it faster.
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
I really think if you understanded the code, then you'd understand where the project needs to go, and you'd know whats possible and what's [i]NOT[i/]
Italic FAIL XD
JK I really liked your projects (you know, before you password locked them) and I think this will be really succesful.
Offline
samurai768 wrote:
Lucario621 wrote:
I really think if you understanded the code, then you'd understand where the project needs to go, and you'd know whats possible and what's NOT
Italic FAIL XD
JK I really liked your projects (you know, before you password locked them) and I think this will be really succesful.
Thanks for the support. And yes, that was an italics fail.
Last edited by adriangl (2009-11-08 15:50:05)
Offline
Yeah that was an italics fail.
Anyway, the thing you said we need to improve, about getting the response faster, I just said, was the last step, after adding new commands. I have most of it planned, basically by interleafing.
Offline
I'm sick ATM so I can't do anything... Even then my scratch is still broke.
Offline
Hey umm, why's there a variable called 'stageswitcheropen?'. I'm going to delete it, only because it currently has no uses.
Offline
Oh wait nevermind, now I remember what it was for.
Anyway I just uploaded 0.5.1.1
I changed the list alphabet to Alphabet (I'm picky lol)
I added some more commands to complementary and deregetory.
I changed something which I messaged all of you...
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
Oh wait nevermind, now I remember what it was for.
Anyway I just uploaded 0.5.1.1
I changed the list alphabet to Alphabet (I'm picky lol)
I added some more commands to complementary and deregetory.
I changed something which I messaged all of you...
I still don't get how the password thing works, but anyways good job.
Offline
Ok, do you know how to edit the scripts? Because I'll tell you they're not in the background.
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
Ok, do you know how to edit the scripts? Because I'll tell you they're not in the background.
I know, it has something to do with that variable, but whatever, forget about it.
So back to business!
Offline
'bump' Sorry, I don't like to bump, but this got off the first page, which suprised me, so yeah.
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
'bump' Sorry, I don't like to bump, but this got off the first page, which suprised me, so yeah.
Hopefully no more bumping needed. Anyways, get back to work!
Offline