Worthless scratch
Everyday after school and homework the first thing i do is come to scratch. Recently there have been numerous scratch "projects" with nothing to them. The only thing there is a picture. sometimes if your lucky it can talk. Different users have been simply picking off images from google and posting them onto scratch "projects". Theres is no quality nor work effort put into these "projects". *. . not to be * people off or anything like that, but man! cmon!!! if your gonna do that you can do it on paint and post a picture slideshow on youtube! (youtube is great though) Even a slideshow would be better than this worthless @#$&!!!! anyone agree with me?!?! If your gonna do this stuff then go to different sites. The only acception i have is if it's your first project, but if your gonna keep on doing this then leave Scratch!!!!
<<<<<>>>>>
Last edited by hypervolts18 (2007-04-23 18:25:09)
Offline
If you agree with any of this plz sign your name and state your response!
Offline
You ever seen a "Hello World" program? It just displays the text "Hello World". It is the staple introduction program to a programing language. They are done by student to learn the interface of their IDE and do something with the programing language. Thats what the programs coming in are now, they are learning pieces not end user functional pieces. As people learn more the community will get more end user programs. There will always be the learning programs here because that is what scratch is about. Every piece here can be downloaded and opened up to see how it runs. Learning and sharing.
~Dasuku
Offline
You bring a very interesting point hypervolts18.
I think the nature of on-line communities, like this one, is that there will be a lot of contributions that seem very simple. These contributions can be:
1. Beginners
2. People just testing the Share feature
3. Incomplete projects
4. Very young members
In all of those scenarios, I would like to make people feel welcomed to try and play with the site without fear of being ridiculed or being told that their projects are not worthy.
At the same time, I do see your point and I think it's important to have good projects that give us new ideas, makes us think, and have fun.
How to achieve both?
Well, I think there are ways of making good projects be more noticeable. Ways of doing this:
1. Voting for a project by clicking on Love It. Will make sure that it goes to the Top Loved section.
2. Creating galleries and contributing to galleries. For example, you can see some interesting games people have contributed to this gallery: http://scratch.mit.edu/galleries/115 We, the administrators of this site, did not create the gallery, it was something that came from the community and we are very happy to see that happening.
3. Tagging. If you use tags, is like you are being connected to other projects. For example, there is a tag called "kill the computer", you can see a lot of great projects being connected that way: http://scratch.mit.edu/tags/kill%20the%20computer
4. Social networking. You can add people whose projects you admire to your list of friends, that way you can always have an easy way of looking at their latest projects.
As this community grows more, we are going to have to deal with this issue more and more and I think your feedback and ideas will help us improve the site. If you have any other ideas for solving this issue please let me know!
This community is made for you and by you.
Offline
srry if i was coming off a little harsh but still...i think i am just not really that optimistic...lol hehe
Offline
Hiyahh x
Lol
What Do You Do ?
Offline
we should make a different section for begginers i guess then the other people would go on another side cuz some good work is being buried into the dark realms of the internet...that is one thing which i won't take back.
Offline
It would be good for there to be different sorts of galleries:
1) clubs and schools: only projects from one source
(variant: single-artist galleries, which we have if you go to the member's page,
but they are a little hard to browse)
2) edited galleries: people submit their projects to the gallery, but an editor (or "moderator", if you prefer that term) decides whether the submission meets the criteria of the gallery. Currently there is only one "the featured list", and the criteria are not clear (just, someone on the scratch team liked it).
3) themed, but open, galleries (we have a few of these, but no way to find them)
4) open galleries (we have way too many of these)
Having an explicit top-level hierarchy like this would make it much easier to find the good stuff: one would go to the edited galleries first, looking for ones whose description matches your tastes. When one finds a good project, one could add a link to the author
(which is something *quite* different from the symmetric friends list that is currently implemented) and look at their other work. If the edited galleries don't have enough stuff, then the themed open galleries would be the next place to look. Finally, one could wade through the random stuff like we have to do now.
Offline
zippzom wrote:
AN example of a stupid project is world of warcraft mascot
I mean all the stupid cat is doing is switching costumes
I'm new to Scratch and, as a learning exercise, have been trawling through this forum to collect tips and hints on all the key queries and comments. This one stood out because at first I wondered about the large number of apparently overly-simple projects. But then I realised that this wasn't at all stupid, but a reflection of how easily newcomers felt able to create something and feel proud enough of it to share it.
Unless you have a background in programming, you're going to come to Scratch and play around with it to see what it does - and what it can let you do. Early success, no matter how simple, will surely lead many on to create ever more complex games and movies. That, for me, is the entire point and strength of Scratch.
Offline
Worthless is, of course, in the eye of the beholder.
That said, I can understand your frustration - if you have spent hours working on a project it is perhaps a little annoying to see it get pushed off the front page by a flurry of "Hello Worlds!" before anyone has had a chance to appreciate it.
Hard to see a way around this, unfortunately. The only thing that springs to mind is the "complexity" categorisation mentioned before-hand but that would pretty much need to be moderated manually. As scratch gathers momentum, I don't see that being very practical.
Offline
Wow mayhem you put everything i wanted say in a non-anger form and with a nice elegant touch!
Offline
If the gallery mechanism were fixed so that gallery owners could have some control over their galleries, it would address this problem. People who uploaded their projects could submit it to various relevant galleries. The gallery owners could look at the project and decide whether to accept it, reject it, or defer decision. People would then start looking for new projects in their favorite galleries rather than trying to wade through the flood of new projects.
Offline
kevin_karplus wrote:
The gallery owners could look at the project and decide whether to accept it, reject it, or defer decision. People would then start looking for new projects in their favorite galleries rather than trying to wade through the flood of new projects.
Sounds like the basis of a very good idea here - but it would require the gallery owners making a definite commitment both in terms of time and effort.
Offline
It is not necessarily a big commitment. Some galleries would remain tiny as the owners accepted very little and didn't look at things. Other galleries would get large as owners accepted lots of stuff. The ones that had a clear mission statement and seemed to get new projects at a reasonable rate would become popular, while ones that grew too slowly or too fast would not have much of a following.
Offline
I personally don't think of Scratch as necessarily having to always go around being a Programming Language and producing Useful Worthwhile Programs. To me it's a program that allows you to create a particular range of occurances, just as this text box here allows me to express a range of character symbols to y'all. This text box would gladly accept the Next Great American Novel, but I'm just typing a forum post & it's OK with that too.
I'm not in favor in any way of creating an atmosphere where you're supposed to worry about whether a project is good enough or meaningful enough to share. There's an aura around programming that it's supposed to be this difficult craft, and I see that energy trying to find its way into this space. Let's not play that way.
<3
Offline
My proposal (to have gallery owners as arbiters of what *they* thought was worth looking at) is completely compatible with mungojelly's notion. Anyone could still put up any project of any quality. People could have their own galleries with whatever criteria they want to use (including "I'll accept anything", "Just people I know at school", "beginner projects", "too silly for words", ...).
Currently, there is only one type of gallery "I'll accept anything" and the owner can't even add things to the gallery himself!
Offline