Scratch

haha. ya it might be that he is like 10.

glough_remade wrote:

Gloug
Glough
Glouhg
Gloughg
Thereseller
and all the others rock!

Glough_remade is gonna be the copyiest scratchR ever! I rock.

and you n00bs better[blocks]<forever>[/blocks] shut up. and if you do block my account, ill make more.

ps i wasnt born in 1879

pps im not from american samoa

ppps im in highschool
:p

[blocks]<forever><say[ nothing][/blocks]

Was that a Glough 'cause he scares me and I don't even know him and it wasn't even directed at me so here and now I'm signing the petition to

GET RID OF GLOUGH FOR EVER                             

HI SIMONPOKEMONMASTER AND S_UCHIHA!

Last edited by torterra (2007-12-10 19:06:10)

u cant stop me!!

did anyone hear something? nope not me cause im IGNORING GLOUGH.

Look, the whole reason that he's doing this is to make everyone angry with him. If you just ignore him, he'll get bored eventually. Making a 4-page thread about him is not the way to do that.
If you don't think that makes sense, here's a graphic description.
[blocks]
<when green flag clicked>
<forever>
<if><( <{ attention }> <=> 0 )>
<broadcast[ copyproject
<end>
[/blocks]

Last edited by Bloing_Gloing (2007-12-24 11:41:21)

xxx27 wrote:

gloug or glough or hackerdude has no right to copy others projects.  no matter what, copying is against the law.  there should be a set of anti copying rules that, when broken, send a message to the offendor at the very least. this should really belong in suggestions, though. 

Actually, whilst glough may be a reprehensible individual for claiming projects as his own, it is NOT against the law for him to copy projects.

All projects shared on the Scratch website, are shared under the Creative Commons license.

Therefore you are free to Share, to copy, distribute, transmit, remix and adapt anybody else work from the website, as long as you abide by these conditions:

1) Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). (This is pretty much covered by the automatic project attribution)

2) Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license.

In fact, under condition (2), by trying to tell people NOT to remix your work, you are, in effect, in breach of the Terms yourself.  When you share a scratch project you MUST share it under a creative commons licence.

*************

That said, remember that anything copied will have a "based on XXX's project" link underneath it, so it is painfully obvious who the original scripter of a project is, and anyone making false claims is just makign themself look extremely foolish.  People will follow the link back to your project, giving you free advertising.

And anyone that downloads your project to copy it is, of course, putting you one download closer to appearing on the front page 

Mayhem wrote:

xxx27 wrote:

gloug or glough or hackerdude has no right to copy others projects.  no matter what, copying is against the law.  there should be a set of anti copying rules that, when broken, send a message to the offendor at the very least. this should really belong in suggestions, though. 

Actually, whilst glough may be a reprehensible individual for claiming projects as his own, it is NOT against the law for him to copy projects.

All projects shared on the Scratch website, are shared under the Creative Commons license.

Therefore you are free to Share, to copy, distribute, transmit, remix and adapt anybody else work from the website, as long as you abide by these conditions:

1) Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). (This is pretty much covered by the automatic project attribution)

2) Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license.

In fact, under condition (2), by trying to tell people NOT to remix your work, you are, in effect, in breach of the Terms yourself.  When you share a scratch project you MUST share it under a creative commons licence.

*************

That said, remember that anything copied will have a "based on XXX's project" link underneath it, so it is painfully obvious who the original scripter of a project is, and anyone making false claims is just makign themself look extremely foolish.  People will follow the link back to your project, giving you free advertising.

And anyone that downloads your project to copy it is, of course, putting you one download closer to appearing on the front page 

1. According to the Creative Commons License, you are entitled and required to give the original author credit if you are to distribute without changing its contents. I would say that the credit system was installed by Scratch, not by glough. So, technically, glough is NOT giving credit to the original author.
2. I think the people here are not asking glough not to REMIX their work. It's more like asking for credit and asking glough to actually change, adapt, alter, transform...etc it.
3. The credit system is for people who actually change something. It's not for someone who just download & upload.
4. Some of us don't exactly want our projects to be top downloaded. In fact, one person may not even add up a lot.
5. Some people don't follow credits, and some people have ways of getting though credit....

Mayhem wrote:

xxx27 wrote:

gloug or glough or hackerdude has no right to copy others projects.  no matter what, copying is against the law.  there should be a set of anti copying rules that, when broken, send a message to the offendor at the very least. this should really belong in suggestions, though. 

Actually, whilst glough may be a reprehensible individual for claiming projects as his own, it is NOT against the law for him to copy projects.

All projects shared on the Scratch website, are shared under the Creative Commons license.

Therefore you are free to Share, to copy, distribute, transmit, remix and adapt anybody else work from the website, as long as you abide by these conditions:

1) Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). (This is pretty much covered by the automatic project attribution)

2) Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license.

In fact, under condition (2), by trying to tell people NOT to remix your work, you are, in effect, in breach of the Terms yourself.  When you share a scratch project you MUST share it under a creative commons licence.

*************

That said, remember that anything copied will have a "based on XXX's project" link underneath it, so it is painfully obvious who the original scripter of a project is, and anyone making false claims is just makign themself look extremely foolish.  People will follow the link back to your project, giving you free advertising.

And anyone that downloads your project to copy it is, of course, putting you one download closer to appearing on the front page 

Mayhem is right.  (Now I'm ignoring him.)  It is not aganst the law.  By the way, he still shouldn't be doing it.  There used to be a company called Don't copy that Floppy.

Edit:  Typo

Last edited by ihaveamac (2008-03-13 05:57:58)

MahoAshley wrote:

brie700 wrote:

<forever><say[ BANN GLOUGHS!

hummm mabey they could like modiffy the system to block only his comp?
Possible??

GLOUHG IS A RAT SWAT HIM!
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/1079 … akiyb9.gif

How u put image????

kevin_karplus wrote:

I thought Glough was about 9 years old, based on the juvenile behavior reported in the forums.  I'm surprised to see a claim that he's in high school.  Of course, anyone can claim anything on the internet.

I seriously doubt he's in high-school. No one in High-school would do this. They also wouldn't have time. High-schoolers get SO much homework. My sister is litterly always on the computer because of high-school homework.