Scratch

filo5 · 2009-07-21 05:39:58

Jonathanpb wrote:
floatingmagictree, it's cheating to bump up your topic so mroe people can see it. But anyway...

O RLY? Everybody do it!

Jonathanpb wrote:
I think no. The avatars and titles would clog up the forums. The titles are rather useless, and they could be used for spamming. Signatures had the same problem, so they added a 50 post rule for it. If they included the titles, they should add the 50 post rule to it.

And we all like rules! And wait - maybe make a rule that doesn't let you post in the same forum without posting in another forum?

Jonathanpb wrote:
And as for the avatars... I think they are a bit useless, since there are avatars in the Scratch website anyway (I mean like when you view projects or go through people's stuff, not in the forums). If they included avatars, I would say that they should be the exact same as your avatar in 'floatingmagictree's stuff'.

And THIS and ONLY THIS is the thing I agree with you. No offence.

Again, just to remind you, please don't bump this up just because it's falling down the list and going to the second page.

*bump*

Anyway, this is a good idea. I'm in.

Xkhaoz · 2009-07-21 14:50:38

I'll sign.

fireball123 · 2009-07-24 01:28:46

this is why they invented signatures, but I'll sign

m44 · 2009-07-24 02:53:36

yes!

Jonathanpb · 2009-07-24 05:23:15

filo5 wrote:
Jonathanpb wrote:
floatingmagictree, it's cheating to bump up your topic so mroe people can see it. But anyway...
O RLY? Everybody do it!
Jonathanpb wrote:
I think no. The avatars and titles would clog up the forums. The titles are rather useless, and they could be used for spamming. Signatures had the same problem, so they added a 50 post rule for it. If they included the titles, they should add the 50 post rule to it.
And we all like rules! And wait - maybe make a rule that doesn't let you post in the same forum without posting in another forum?

Jonathanpb wrote:
And as for the avatars... I think they are a bit useless, since there are avatars in the Scratch website anyway (I mean like when you view projects or go through people's stuff, not in the forums). If they included avatars, I would say that they should be the exact same as your avatar in 'floatingmagictree's stuff'.
And THIS and ONLY THIS is the thing I agree with you. No offence.

Again, just to remind you, please don't bump this up just because it's falling down the list and going to the second page.
*bump*

Anyway, this is a good idea. I'm in.

This was so amusing to see the 'Jonathanpb wrote' four times, followed by your remarks! Anyway, I don't feel offended at all.

Last edited by Jonathanpb (2009-07-25 07:01:38)

filo5 · 2009-07-24 05:35:03

*bump* Ya know that I signeth da petiton, rite?

Blade-Edge · 2009-07-24 05:35:57

not rly a bump since the last post was 2 minutes ago tongue

frogger3140 · 2010-06-20 14:22:49

We need avatars

juststickman · 2010-06-20 14:29:33

Yes, yes we do.

GirWaffles64 · 2010-06-20 15:09:22

This is old, but whatev. I sign.

Chrischb · 2010-06-21 01:50:50

I think this was resolved once... it wasn't so clear, though.

Read about it here at chapter eight. big_smile

Jonathanpb · 2010-06-21 03:11:10

NOOOOOOOOO AVATARS ARE COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY big_smile

The Scratch Forums are for sharing information and helping others... avatars are completely unnecessary. If the Scratch Forums were like a chatroom (which Miscellaneous is, actually roll ), then it wouldn't be so bad; it would be a leisure place, so why not... but the Scratch Forums aren't like that. big_smile