NoxSpooth wrote:
LRGonzales wrote:
There's something you need to know...
LRGonzales wrote:
This is a joke that uses Scratchblocks.
~when i wake up play [Kirby's Epic Yarn v] for (who knows?) hours realize [you missed Barney and Friends on tv v] play sound [WT^ BOOM] explooooooooode!!!That wasn't supposed to be the name of a meme explosion that most people know with the letter that stands for an explicit word replaced with a symbol. It's the early name for a replacement for the SFX. I wanted to figure something more appropriate for small ones. It's meant to be pronounced "Witty!?"
Uh... I never said that it was explicit...
I know you didn't, but I didn't want parents to disapprove of me.
Offline
NoxSpooth wrote:
Helen Keller wrote:
When one door of happiness closes, another opens, but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one that has been opened for us.
That's a good point...
But is "Hellen Keller" a famous person or a scratcher?
Offline
LRGonzales wrote:
NoxSpooth wrote:
Helen Keller wrote:
When one door of happiness closes, another opens, but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one that has been opened for us.
That's a good point...
But is "Hellen Keller" a famous person or a scratcher?
Quotes don't have to be from Scratch to apply to it.
Offline
kayybee wrote:
LRGonzales wrote:
NoxSpooth wrote:
That's a good point...
But is "Hellen Keller" a famous person or a scratcher?Quotes don't have to be from Scratch to apply to it.
Oh. I guess it's okay as long as you don't accuse a scratcher of saying something he never did.
Offline
Liamadams wrote:
LRGonzales wrote:
when [right arrow v] key pressed move [10] stepsthis works better:
when gf clicked forever if <key [right arrow v] pressed?> change x by [3] [here it walks smoother.
That's not the subject of this thread. He was just giving an example.
Offline
mythbusteranimator wrote:
No. It is actually nicer and has more features than they could comfortably add here.
To me it looks slightly cluttered. They should at least add a "Switch to Old Looks" button (I did not come up w/ that idea).
Please don't threaten with quitting, either. NEVER has the ST even thought about making a decision because one user wanted it.
I wasn't saying I was quitting...
Offline
LRGonzales wrote:
mythbusteranimator wrote:
No. It is actually nicer and has more features than they could comfortably add here.
To me it looks slightly cluttered. They should at least add a "Switch to Old Looks" button (I did not come up w/ that idea).
I've actually seen it come up in various places, so I think it's common enough that they should implement it. (Btw, cluttered to me too)
Last edited by Hyperbola (2013-04-21 12:47:53)
Offline
kayybee wrote:
Switching to old looks would mean you'd miss out on all the new front-page features (and the new awesome styling too)
I think he meant the old scratch project editor.
Offline
Hyperbola wrote:
kayybee wrote:
Switching to old looks would mean you'd miss out on all the new front-page features (and the new awesome styling too)
I think he meant the old scratch project editor.
Oh. Well, obviously if there are more blocks its going to be more cluttered, but if you didn't want it to be cluttered, lets just keep "when green flag clicked" and "move 10 steps" so it won't be cluttered.
But really, all that's been changed is just like rearrangement and addition of blocks. Not much.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
i dont understand #4... pressing the stop button/using the block can only stop active scripts anyway, since it stops those running... right?
Oh. Oops.
Offline