Scratch
archived forums
#301 2012-12-05 11:14:25
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
laser314 wrote:
Magnie wrote:
laser314 wrote:
Is chat.py 3.0 working yet?
I'm going to be dropping 3.0 since it doesn't have the stability that I want. So we (I) am going to move on to Chat.PY 4.0 and LSTC Green (since it should supposedly use less resources).
But chat.py 2.0 doesn't work.
It does for me O:
Weird.
I'm back.
Maybe.
Offline
#302 2012-12-05 16:59:07
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
laser314 wrote:
Magnie wrote:
laser314 wrote:
Is chat.py 3.0 working yet?
I'm going to be dropping 3.0 since it doesn't have the stability that I want. So we (I) am going to move on to Chat.PY 4.0 and LSTC Green (since it should supposedly use less resources).
But chat.py 2.0 doesn't work.
Odd, I guess it will be down until Christmas break.
DigiTechs: It will be ':<chat4' to load the plugin, and then before every message sent to the plugin it will be ':> [plugin name] [message]'.
Offline
#303 2012-12-07 01:55:19
- ohaiderstudios
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-31
- Posts: 100+
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
Chat.PY 2.0 is INCREDIBLY stable, it was definitely the best client you've made, Magnie. Chat.PY 3.0 was a big downgrade in my opinion (no offense). I'm not sure if any future Chat.PY client will ever be like 2.0.
So, do what Windows did: Repackage 2.0 to make it look like 3.0
Fork Clamor on GitHub!
Offline
#304 2012-12-07 10:05:59
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
ohaiderstudios wrote:
Chat.PY 2.0 is INCREDIBLY stable, it was definitely the best client you've made, Magnie. Chat.PY 3.0 was a big downgrade in my opinion (no offense). I'm not sure if any future Chat.PY client will ever be like 2.0.
So, do what Windows did: Repackage 2.0 to make it look like 3.0
Yeah, 2.0 is an amazement for me. 
How was Chat.PY 3.0 a downgrade (other than the fact that it would get stuck in an infinite loop)? I thought it was an upgrade to the terrible command system.
Offline
#305 2012-12-07 10:30:28
- GeonoTRON2000
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-12-24
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
Magnie wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:
Chat.PY 2.0 is INCREDIBLY stable, it was definitely the best client you've made, Magnie. Chat.PY 3.0 was a big downgrade in my opinion (no offense). I'm not sure if any future Chat.PY client will ever be like 2.0.
So, do what Windows did: Repackage 2.0 to make it look like 3.0Yeah, 2.0 is an amazement for me.
How was Chat.PY 3.0 a downgrade (other than the fact that it would get stuck in an infinite loop)? I thought it was an upgrade to the terrible command system.
That would be it's only advantage.
Offline
#306 2012-12-07 18:20:34
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
Magnie wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:
Chat.PY 2.0 is INCREDIBLY stable, it was definitely the best client you've made, Magnie. Chat.PY 3.0 was a big downgrade in my opinion (no offense). I'm not sure if any future Chat.PY client will ever be like 2.0.
So, do what Windows did: Repackage 2.0 to make it look like 3.0Yeah, 2.0 is an amazement for me.
How was Chat.PY 3.0 a downgrade (other than the fact that it would get stuck in an infinite loop)? I thought it was an upgrade to the terrible command system.That would be it's only advantage.
And being in multiple rooms at once, spam/flood protection, and Bit Art.
4.0 also has plans to have a avatar chat type mode (idea from Epicness123 or something). Hopefully that will be an upgrade to 3.0 and 2.0 (including the stability as well).
Offline
#307 2012-12-07 23:16:44
- ohaiderstudios
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-10-31
- Posts: 100+
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
3.0 makes Francium look stable. Things that were fixed in 2.0, like infinite loops, overlapping messages being displayed as the same message, etc. came up again in 3.0.
Just take 2.0 and make better commands, rewriting only what you need.
Fork Clamor on GitHub!
Offline
#308 2012-12-09 14:02:05
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
Im was going to make a 2.0chat.py mod to include some of the 3.0 commands. But I cant be bothered.
Last edited by playzooki (2012-12-09 14:04:51)
I iz a sig. So there. CLICK ME ITS SO IMPORTANT!!!!
Offline
#309 2012-12-15 06:24:51
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
I'm so annoyed that my Lua bot doesn't like to communicate with your server D:
Well, atleast I can still use the mini chat thing that I made. But it doesn't have usernames yet.
I'm back.
Maybe.
Offline
#310 2012-12-27 08:02:59
#311 2013-01-17 05:55:24
#312 2013-01-17 11:48:43
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
Chat.PY 4.0 is pretty stable from my experience of testing it though all the features aren't implemented yet. The multiplayer space game is still kind of in design mode. 
Offline
#313 2013-01-18 16:41:58
#314 2013-01-18 17:18:22
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
DigiTechs wrote:
I'm going to assume that everyone's on Chat.PY 3.0 as I'm the only one on 2.0 lol.
*rage*
Or is it that I am the only one that can be bothered to go on now?
The latter. 3.0 isn't even up/working.
Offline
#315 2013-01-18 17:20:43
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
Magnie wrote:
DigiTechs wrote:
I'm going to assume that everyone's on Chat.PY 3.0 as I'm the only one on 2.0 lol.
*rage*
Or is it that I am the only one that can be bothered to go on now?The latter.
Aw. :C
Note: I am talking in an odd way now.
Y U NO JOIN CHATPY2.0? RAYGE!!!
I'm back.
Maybe.
Offline
#316 2013-04-04 13:04:45
Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)
Hey. This may look like a necrobump, but since I'm still slightly interested in this, I'll ask this:
will Little Server That Can come back up at some point? All attempts I have tried to connect have resulted in a 'Connection Refused' error. (This is testing with Lua, too. I was planning on making the Lua bot I was making work properly)
I'm back.
Maybe.
Offline