Scratch

GeonoTRON2000 · 2013-03-24 22:32:26

The GT Forums are some forums that I made a while ago for discussing anything and everything. During the school year, however, they were overrun with spam from commercial spambots. Since it was pretty much physically impossible for me to delete all of the thousands of spam messages, I had to delete all of the posts. When I did this, however, I decided to switch to a forum software that was easier to use. I have switched The GT Forums over to FluxBB and now present them to the community. Additionally, I've managed to install the cash mod from FluxBB 1.2 (although it might be buggy.)

Link: http://forums.thegt.org/

We are open to suggestions if you have any!

dontbombiraq · 2013-03-24 22:42:55

suggestions? how about changing the subheader
or the header image for that matter

jji7skyline · 2013-03-24 22:46:19

Coal is safer and cheaper than nuclear fusion.

dontbombiraq · 2013-03-24 22:48:38

jji7skyline wrote:
Coal is safer and cheaper than nuclear fusion.

cheaper, yes — but most certainly not safer

Moxux · 2013-03-24 22:50:47

Don't we have enough forums already?

GeonoTRON2000 · 2013-03-24 22:51:11

dontbombiraq wrote:
suggestions? how about changing the subheader
or the header image for that matter

What would you use instead?

jji7skyline · 2013-03-24 22:51:43

dontbombiraq wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
Coal is safer and cheaper than nuclear fusion.
cheaper, yes — but most certainly not safer

Ahem...

Chernobyl
Hiroshima
Fukushima

dontbombiraq · 2013-03-24 22:52:55

jji7skyline wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
Coal is safer and cheaper than nuclear fusion.
cheaper, yes — but most certainly not safer
Ahem...

Chernobyl
Hiroshima
Fukushima

3 disasters, one of which was not an accident
vs.
tens of thousands of coal mining accidents

GeonoTRON2000 · 2013-03-24 22:52:58

@Moxux: These are not new, I'm just re-starting them with a different software.
@jjiskyline: Those were nuclear fission. wink

Last edited by GeonoTRON2000 (2013-03-24 22:53:28)

jji7skyline · 2013-03-24 22:54:00

Oh, that makes a world of difference. Carry on then! :3

dontbombiraq · 2013-03-24 22:58:54

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:
suggestions? how about changing the subheader
or the header image for that matter
What would you use instead?

GeonoTRON2000 · 2013-03-24 23:15:45

dontbombiraq wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:
suggestions? how about changing the subheader
or the header image for that matter
What would you use instead?
http://i45.tinypic.com/2ry4z91.png

Ok, except that image is kinda small and the wrong color.
*goes to find one that fits the description*

dontbombiraq · 2013-03-24 23:17:41

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

What would you use instead?
http://i45.tinypic.com/2ry4z91.png
Ok, except that image is kinda small and the wrong color.
*goes to find one that fits the description*

the wrong color?!
CMYK colors go with everything thank you very much!

GeonoTRON2000 · 2013-03-24 23:21:04

dontbombiraq wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:

http://i45.tinypic.com/2ry4z91.png
Ok, except that image is kinda small and the wrong color.
*goes to find one that fits the description*
the wrong color?!
CMYK colors go with everything thank you very much!

How about this:

dontbombiraq · 2013-03-24 23:27:16

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

Ok, except that image is kinda small and the wrong color.
*goes to find one that fits the description*
the wrong color?!
CMYK colors go with everything thank you very much!
How about this:
http://i.imgur.com/NHMTKwF.png

ew, light blue and black do not blend
and that font definitely leaves a lot to be desired, look up "Roboto" on google webfonts

GeonoTRON2000 · 2013-03-25 00:01:54

dontbombiraq wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:

the wrong color?!
CMYK colors go with everything thank you very much!
How about this:
http://i.imgur.com/NHMTKwF.png
ew, light blue and black do not blend
and that font definitely leaves a lot to be desired, look up "Roboto" on google webfonts

They do blend when you get punched in the eye. Anyways, how about this one:

sccar3 · 2013-03-25 13:37:01

I have a GT 640M 2GB.

soniku3 · 2013-03-25 13:45:59

Moxux wrote:
Don't we have enough forums already?

never enough, never.

Last edited by soniku3 (2013-03-25 13:46:07)

dontbombiraq · 2013-03-25 21:02:13

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

How about this:
http://i.imgur.com/NHMTKwF.png
ew, light blue and black do not blend
and that font definitely leaves a lot to be desired, look up "Roboto" on google webfonts
They do blend when you get punched in the eye. Anyways, how about this one:
http://i.imgur.com/mIjlpqH.png

two for two, go here and select mission gothic, edmondsans, or quaver to your preference. for this, I'd suggest using Quaver Sans

GeonoTRON2000 · 2013-03-25 22:12:27

dontbombiraq wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:

ew, light blue and black do not blend
and that font definitely leaves a lot to be desired, look up "Roboto" on google webfonts
They do blend when you get punched in the eye. Anyways, how about this one:
http://i.imgur.com/mIjlpqH.png
two for two, go here and select mission gothic, edmondsans, or quaver to your preference. for this, I'd suggest using Quaver Sans

So you don't like it?

dontbombiraq · 2013-03-25 22:14:59

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
dontbombiraq wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

They do blend when you get punched in the eye. Anyways, how about this one:
http://i.imgur.com/mIjlpqH.png
two for two, go here and select mission gothic, edmondsans, or quaver to your preference. for this, I'd suggest using Quaver Sans
So you don't like it?

astute of you

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2013-03-24 22:32:26

The GT Forums (Revived)

#2 2013-03-24 22:42:55

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

#3 2013-03-24 22:46:19

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

#4 2013-03-24 22:48:38

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

jji7skyline wrote:

#5 2013-03-24 22:50:47

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

#6 2013-03-24 22:51:11

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

dontbombiraq wrote:

#7 2013-03-24 22:51:43

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

dontbombiraq wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

#8 2013-03-24 22:52:55

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

jji7skyline wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

#9 2013-03-24 22:52:58

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

#10 2013-03-24 22:54:00

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

#11 2013-03-24 22:58:54

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

#12 2013-03-24 23:15:45

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

dontbombiraq wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

#13 2013-03-24 23:17:41

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

#14 2013-03-24 23:21:04

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

dontbombiraq wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

#15 2013-03-24 23:27:16

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

#16 2013-03-25 00:01:54

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

dontbombiraq wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

#17 2013-03-25 13:37:01

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

#18 2013-03-25 13:45:59

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

Moxux wrote:

#19 2013-03-25 21:02:13

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

#20 2013-03-25 22:12:27

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

dontbombiraq wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

#21 2013-03-25 22:14:59

Re: The GT Forums (Revived)

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

Board footer