Scratch
archived forums
#51 2013-03-01 13:32:33
Offline
#52 2013-03-02 01:59:13
Offline
#53 2013-03-03 04:58:10
Offline
#54 2013-03-04 01:27:51
Offline
#55 2013-03-04 18:43:12
- CanadianGeorge
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 100+
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
You forgot me. Just saying if you can add me that would be great.
"You're weird" -My Sister
Offline
#56 2013-03-05 01:31:25
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
CanadianGeorge wrote:
You forgot me. Just saying if you can add me that would be great.
When I opened this thread, I had a system to get rid of inactive members. Since nearly everyone is inactive now I might as well add you regardless.
Offline
#57 2013-03-05 20:19:27
- Programmer_112
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-02-17
- Posts: 100+
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
Please help with this project!. I flagged what I could…but there were too many.
Offline
#58 2013-03-06 01:58:25
- Blazingwave
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-10-27
- Posts: 500+
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
JH1010 wrote:
CanadianGeorge wrote:
You forgot me. Just saying if you can add me that would be great.
When I opened this thread, I had a system to get rid of inactive members. Since nearly everyone is inactive now I might as well add you regardless.
We are not inactive, we flag tags but there is no reason to post messages. This does not classify us as "inactive".
Offline
#59 2013-03-06 02:24:31
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
Blazingwave wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
CanadianGeorge wrote:
You forgot me. Just saying if you can add me that would be great.
When I opened this thread, I had a system to get rid of inactive members. Since nearly everyone is inactive now I might as well add you regardless.
We are not inactive, we flag tags but there is no reason to post messages. This does not classify us as "inactive".
So the thread is not needed?
Offline
#60 2013-03-06 02:41:59
- Blazingwave
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-10-27
- Posts: 500+
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
JH1010 wrote:
Blazingwave wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
When I opened this thread, I had a system to get rid of inactive members. Since nearly everyone is inactive now I might as well add you regardless.
We are not inactive, we flag tags but there is no reason to post messages. This does not classify us as "inactive".
So the thread is not needed?
It is needed for people to tell others what projects need to be flagged and to raise peoples awareness of this but to be active we dont need to post.
I meant "if we don't post messages if doesn't make us inactive".
Last edited by Blazingwave (2013-03-06 02:43:34)
Offline
#61 2013-03-08 02:57:22
Offline
#62 2013-03-09 08:10:59
Offline
#63 2013-03-11 03:40:01
Offline
#64 2013-03-14 03:48:54
Offline
#65 2013-03-15 14:16:04
Offline
#66 2013-03-15 14:21:14
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
What is this collab for? If its for trying to keep scratch clean, then I would like to help, but I am not totally sure what this is for.
Regards,
CAA14
Offline
#67 2013-03-17 15:55:01
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
CAA14 wrote:
What is this collab for? If its for trying to keep scratch clean, then I would like to help, but I am not totally sure what this is for.
Regards,
CAA14
This collab is here to combat tag spam. However, there isn't much tag spam anymor but you can still join if you want.
Offline
#68 2013-03-17 16:21:44
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
JH1010 wrote:
CAA14 wrote:
What is this collab for? If its for trying to keep scratch clean, then I would like to help, but I am not totally sure what this is for.
Regards,
CAA14This collab is here to combat tag spam. However, there isn't much tag spam anymor but you can still join if you want.
Ah, okay. I think i will join, but first, what would i have to do?
Regards,
CAA14
Offline
#69 2013-03-20 14:12:32
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
CAA14 wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
CAA14 wrote:
What is this collab for? If its for trying to keep scratch clean, then I would like to help, but I am not totally sure what this is for.
Regards,
CAA14This collab is here to combat tag spam. However, there isn't much tag spam anymor but you can still join if you want.
Ah, okay. I think i will join, but first, what would i have to do?
Regards,
CAA14
Flag tag spam. That's it.
Offline
#70 2013-03-20 14:13:40
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
JH1010 wrote:
CAA14 wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
This collab is here to combat tag spam. However, there isn't much tag spam anymor but you can still join if you want.Ah, okay. I think i will join, but first, what would i have to do?
Regards,
CAA14Flag tag spam. That's it.
Cool, once I get back from this vacation, I will join.
Regards,
CAA14
Offline
#71 2013-03-23 03:03:18
Re: Operation: FLAG TAGS (Formerly Operation: TAG SPAM)
CAA14 wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
CAA14 wrote:
Ah, okay. I think i will join, but first, what would i have to do?
Regards,
CAA14Flag tag spam. That's it.
Cool, once I get back from this vacation, I will join.
Regards,
CAA14
Added to the list.
Offline
#72 2013-03-24 13:50:11
Offline
#73 2013-03-27 03:42:03
Offline
#74 2013-03-28 03:39:52
Offline
#75 2013-04-01 12:41:53
Offline