Scratch

Well i  think the myth of the monster may come fom this:
A long time ago the lake was attached to the sea, when the lake became landlocked 1 or 2 sturgen became trapped inside. THey live a very long time. The myth may have come from this, although they are definitly long dead by now.

I don't think there is one though, with all the tech we have it would have been spotted, the most famous sighting was a clear fake and it would have died from pollution or something

So yeah, everyone is entitled to their own opinions though

Actually, scientists have put a radar detector (or something) down there and they have detected a very large creature.

calebxy wrote:

mythbusteranimator wrote:

Actually, scientists have put a radar detector (or something) down there and they have detected a very large creature.

Link?

I had to do that. 
Anyways, I think that Nessie exists.
But it's probably more like a misidentification. It's most likely not a monster but a prehistoric water dinosaur thingy.

Yeah, I used to think that, but I don't anymore.

wasn't the original photo admitted to be a toy

luiysia wrote:

wasn't the original photo admitted to be a toy

I don't know if it was the first photo, but it's the most iconic one. And yes, that was a toy. There's actually a very interesting reason behind why they did that. It was kind of for revenge, or basically to troll the community, because the person's father (or some relative like that) had been hired by the Daily Mail to search for the Loch Ness Monster. So he did, and he found some footprints that he claimed were from the monster. But it actually turned out that they were from a hippo (I can't remember if he faked that on purpose or not). So he was fired. And then, because of that, he got his son (or some relative; I can't quite remember) to create that picture which is now iconic.

Last edited by calebxy (2013-03-13 08:52:19)

haxcharsol wrote:

calebxy wrote:

luiysia wrote:

wasn't the original photo admitted to be a toy

I don't know if it was the first photo, but it's the most iconic one. And yes, that was a toy. There's actually a very interesting reason behind why they did that. It was kind of for revenge, or basically to troll the community, because the person's father (or some relative like that) had been hired by the Daily Mail to search for the Loch Ness Monster. So he did, and he found some footprints that he claimed were from the monster. But it actually turned out that they were from a hippo (I can't remember if he faked that on purpose or not). So he was fired. And then, because of that, he got his son (or some relative; I can't quite remember) to create that picture which is now iconic.

Hippos in Loch Ness? 

I'm pretty certain they were fake, but I can't remember if he's the one who faked them, or if it was some other person.

Luigitailsdoll45 wrote:

haxcharsol wrote:

calebxy wrote:

Link?

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q71/ … a/link.jpg
I had to do that. 
Anyways, I think that Nessie exists.
But it's probably more like a misidentification. It's most likely not a monster but a prehistoric water dinosaur thingy.

*plesiosaur
I'm sorry.
:3

Yeah, I heard that one theory suggest a line of breeding water dinosaurs (pleiosaurs or whatever) may live in the lake. This makes sense because no one monster could survive for a hundred years.However, it is suspicous that no one has actually had suffiencient proof of the monster(s). So I'm 50/50 on this one.

I personally don't believe in 'Nessie', because I believe that we would have found skeletons of the creatures, or some other form of proof of their existance.