This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2013-03-03 08:37:31

PresidentialNyan
Scratcher
Registered: 2013-02-23
Posts: 59

or block

This block we all need.

([ ] or [ ])
We need that block!
And please don't tell me,
We already have an
([ ] or [ ])
block. We have an 
<[ ] or [ ]>
block, but not an
([ ] or [ ])
block.  big_smile


http://i43.tinypic.com/4ruira.jpg

Offline

 

#2 2013-03-03 08:43:24

PresidentialNyan
Scratcher
Registered: 2013-02-23
Posts: 59

Re: or block

oops, it got messed up, the last ne went well though.  big_smile  XD


http://i43.tinypic.com/4ruira.jpg

Offline

 

#3 2013-03-03 08:45:56

scimonster
Community Moderator
Registered: 2010-06-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: or block

Actually, what we need is a reporter if/else. Then you could just do (if <(pick random (0) to (1) = [1]> then [abc] else [def]).

Offline

 

#4 2013-03-03 09:30:46

shadowmouse
New Scratcher
Registered: 2013-02-03
Posts: 100+

Re: or block

scimonster wrote:

Actually, what we need is a reporter if/else. Then you could just do (if <(pick random (0) to (1) = [1]> then [abc] else [def]).

I've been wanting one of those for a while now (as well as a boolean if/else) so it was one of the first things I did when I learnt how to mod and it's really useful.

Offline

 

#5 2013-03-11 21:43:36

PresidentialNyan
Scratcher
Registered: 2013-02-23
Posts: 59

Re: or block

good! Finnaly someone agrees with me  cool


http://i43.tinypic.com/4ruira.jpg

Offline

 

#6 2013-03-12 12:08:19

dusty22
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-09-28
Posts: 49

Re: or block

I agree, you can already make this thorugh workarounds, but this would be less tedious.

Offline

 

Board footer