Scratch

nXIII · 2013-03-01 23:03:51

bharvey wrote:
nXIII wrote:
Look at all the wonderful things you can do with native widgets!
Umm, are you really sure you want your browser to spell check your password?

Umm, it doesn't. (That's why the password field doesn't have any red squiggles.)

bharvey · 2013-03-01 23:45:24

nXIII wrote:
Umm, it doesn't. (That's why the password field doesn't have any red squiggles.)

Yeah, I know, but this started as an argument about passwords so I thought it was funny. Oh well...

Hardmath123 · 2013-03-02 01:48:07

Well, you could always have one of those new-age visual passwords (like dragging along the edge of a book in a picture)… that solves your non-technical-crowd problem, too. tongue

EDIT: My first real attempt at making my own signature, what do you think?

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2013-03-02 02:48:06)

blob8108 · 2013-03-02 03:17:14

Hardmath123 wrote:
My first real attempt at making my own signature, what do you think?

The font's a little blurry, but I see where you're going. smile Still, I really think you should do an n and not have a big image at all... tongue

joefarebrother · 2013-03-02 03:25:05

bharvey wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
Why does the second use of the binary search block cause an error when the first doesn't?
Because the first example happens not to need to make a recursive call. The problem is in RECURSIVE, not in the search block:

http://cs.berkeley.edu/~bh/jfbfact.png

Usually in a case involving scope of variables when I can't decide whether to declare something to be a bug in Snap! or a bug in the user's program, I just try it in Scheme, but Scheme doesn't have upvars. But it works in BYOB! So, yeah, it's a Snap! bug.

Ah, ok. I'll just have to do it with script variables and set.

xly · 2013-03-02 03:38:09

@bharvey & Jens
For me , as a Lambda Snap! user, cloud Save of Snap! projects works well with Chrome. Snap! projects saved using Chrome can be re-Opened with Firefox. No need to use the Export to *.xml to protect projects from any cause of deletion, like browser cache cleaning !

Last edited by xly (2013-03-02 03:39:45)

Hardmath123 · 2013-03-02 03:54:21

blob8108 wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
My first real attempt at making my own signature, what do you think?
The font's a little blurry, but I see where you're going.

That's the point! I was going for Tim Burton meets Jackson Pollack, but clearly I flunked. wink

Still, I really think you should do an n and not have a big image at all...

Yeah, I'll keep a text-only signature once we shift to 2.0 (more text control!). Speaking of which, nice cake!

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2013-03-02 04:02:33)

blob8108 · 2013-03-02 04:48:48

Hardmath123 wrote:
nice cake!

Thanks! tongue

joefarebrother · 2013-03-02 04:56:21

Hey, remember when I said I was going to make a scheme interpreter is scratch? Well, I've built the basic data types Integers, Pairs, Symbols, and Booleans, and built a test program to test these!. It's not a scheme interpreter yet, but it tests for bugs in what I've done so far.

roijac · 2013-03-02 14:29:44

blob8108 wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
nice cake!
Thanks!

what's the name of the object with the eat() method?

blob8108 · 2013-03-02 14:50:57

roijac wrote:
blob8108 wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
nice cake!
Thanks!
what's the name of the object with the eat() method?

"mike". The guy I made the cake for. tongue

bharvey · 2013-03-02 15:50:49

@blob: All that conversation finally got me to click the link -- I'd thought you meant a virtual cake in Scratch! But it's a real cake! Can we be friends too? smile

@jfb: This weekend I'm booked solid interviewing ridiculously smart high school seniors for the Berkeley scholarship office, so, I am going to look at your Scheme stuff but probably not until Monday.

blob8108 · 2013-03-02 15:54:45

bharvey wrote:
Can we be friends too?

You want me to make you cake? tongue

estile · 2013-03-02 17:15:12

hey everyone, ive just got into BYOB and noticed something called the elements editor you can get to by right clicking a block. does anyone know what it is or how to use it?

nXIII · 2013-03-02 17:32:21

estile wrote:
hey everyone, ive just got into BYOB and noticed something called the elements editor you can get to by right clicking a block. does anyone know what it is or how to use it?

It's a drag-and-drop interface for BYOB's Squeak code.

Last edited by nXIII (2013-03-02 17:32:53)

xly · 2013-03-02 17:34:47

@Jens
It-is a detail, but Snap! does not "understand" Numeric pad keys.
Same remark for Byob, contrarily to Scratch which "understand" them !

Last edited by xly (2013-03-02 17:35:16)

bharvey · 2013-03-02 20:37:14

blob8108 wrote:
You want me to make you cake?

Yeah! (Never mind that I'm diabetic.)

The only trouble is it'd probably be stale by the time I got it. Maybe you can bring it to Scratch@Barcelona. smile

bharvey · 2013-03-02 21:32:33

Hardmath123 wrote:
My first real attempt at making my own signature, what do you think?

{{{}}, {{}, {{}}}, {{}, {{}}, {{}, {{}}}}

(EDIT: I decided I like this way better than my first effort.)

Last edited by bharvey (2013-03-02 22:47:34)

Hardmath123 · 2013-03-03 00:13:06

The brackets aren't matched up… tongue

bharvey · 2013-03-03 00:38:52

Hardmath123 wrote:
The brackets aren't matched up…

Oops, yeah, I missed one. But don't you like the elegant understatement of it as a sig for you?

iTweak0r · 2013-03-03 17:14:48

I made a Snap! Account!

xly · 2013-03-03 17:22:41

@bharvey
The instruction "property OF sprite" allows a sprite to know for any other "slave" sprite :
1 - its physical properties (xposition, yposition ...)
2 - its methods (= a local variable defined as a script block, executable by RUN for example).
But "property OF sprite" does not give access to local custom blocks of "slave sprite".
For which reason local methods and local blocks are handled in a different way by OF instruction ?

Last edited by xly (2013-03-03 18:26:31)

bharvey · 2013-03-03 18:41:07

xly wrote:
For which reason local methods and local blocks are handled in a different way by OF instruction ?

Because we haven't designed, let alone implemented, the 4.1 OOP system. The OF block right now is really just supposed to do what it does in Scratch; it's a happy accident, which you discovered, that it lets you call methods. Give us a while to recover from 4.0; we'll get there.

technoboy10 · 2013-03-07 12:00:29

Where are the block specs for Snap!?

Also, how do you let a web server be accessed through the http:// block?

Last edited by technoboy10 (2013-03-07 13:59:40)

Devloper123 · 2013-03-07 12:23:46

illusionist wrote:
I NEEED IT! NAOW!

There need to be a way to upload BYOB projects to a BYOB website...

modshare.org

Scratch

archived forums

#7201 2013-03-01 23:03:51

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

bharvey wrote:

nXIII wrote:

#7202 2013-03-01 23:45:24

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

nXIII wrote:

#7203 2013-03-02 01:48:07

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7204 2013-03-02 03:17:14

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

#7205 2013-03-02 03:25:05

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

bharvey wrote:

joefarebrother wrote:

#7206 2013-03-02 03:38:09

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7207 2013-03-02 03:54:21

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

blob8108 wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#7208 2013-03-02 04:48:48

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

#7209 2013-03-02 04:56:21

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7210 2013-03-02 14:29:44

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

blob8108 wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#7211 2013-03-02 14:50:57

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

roijac wrote:

blob8108 wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#7212 2013-03-02 15:50:49

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7213 2013-03-02 15:54:45

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

bharvey wrote:

#7214 2013-03-02 17:15:12

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7215 2013-03-02 17:32:21

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

estile wrote:

#7216 2013-03-02 17:34:47

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7217 2013-03-02 20:37:14

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

blob8108 wrote:

#7218 2013-03-02 21:32:33

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

#7219 2013-03-03 00:13:06

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7220 2013-03-03 00:38:52

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

#7221 2013-03-03 17:14:48

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7222 2013-03-03 17:22:41

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7223 2013-03-03 18:41:07

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

xly wrote:

#7224 2013-03-07 12:00:29

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

#7225 2013-03-07 12:23:46

Re: BYOB 3 - Discussion Thread

illusionist wrote:

Board footer