owetre18 wrote:
luiysia wrote:
owetre18 wrote:
This is better: BIRDS WITH ARMS!
WHY DO YOU USE BING :'(
thank you, soup, for giving this to my lifeActually, BING is better.
Take the test thing.
Plus, after a while, you get used to it.
You mean the test where you have to come up with search queries that you don't normally search, and uses a Google that HASN'T been collecting your search information for years?
Google is better outside of that test, their creepy search personalizing is HELPFUL.
Offline
owetre18 wrote:
luiysia wrote:
owetre18 wrote:
This is better: BIRDS WITH ARMS!
WHY DO YOU USE BING :'(
thank you, soup, for giving this to my lifeActually, BING is better.
Take the test thing.
Plus, after a while, you get used to it.
let's experiment!
As you can see, while Bing merely brings you a few panicked users and a couple of livestrong articles, Google takes the effort to give you some probable causes and information on them. Miscellaneous functions on both clearly have more effort put into them by Google - for instance, when searching population, while Bing just gives you a number, Google gives you a chart of population growth, the flag, and a map. When using the calculator, Bing requires you to type in each function, which can be a pain in the rear, while Google gives you a miniature calculator. If you type in a graphable equation and "graph" into Google, it will actually give you a graph for it that allows you to scroll around, while Bing simply directs you to wolframalpha or similar sites. When using the Bing translator to translate wenxuecity.com (which is in Chinese), not only did Bing provide extremely poor translations, all the styling was lost and it managed to give my location as "Canada".
Also, Google won the search challenge.
Offline
soup you confuse me
Offline
This is...this is.... interesting?
Offline
I guess I neglected to mention several months ago that this also reminds me of this album I have (but on CD).
Offline
Ok, guys, that's enough Internet for one day.....
Offline
ITS AWESOME
Offline