Scratch

BirdByte · 2012-08-21 05:20:28

JH1010 wrote:
BirdByte wrote:
Actually, you can look up "all verbs" "all nouns" "all prepositions" "all articles" (k it's just the, a, and an) etc. etc. and put them in lists using the "import" feature, and write a simple script.
I thought this then tried to find a website that listed every word in the English Language but such a website does not exist.

You'll need to look up word groups individually.

zammer990 · 2012-08-21 10:05:11

This suggestion also brings up the problem of non english speaking countries

taddl · 2012-08-22 17:47:29

What about other languages?

Greenatic · 2012-08-22 18:10:44

zammer990 wrote:
This suggestion also brings up the problem of non english speaking countries

taddl wrote:
What about other languages?

Dictionaries for those can be added too. This won't bring up a size problem--only dictionaries used in the project would be loaded, so not all Scratch projects will need to download all the dictionaries.

cool_dude_2 · 2013-01-26 17:52:20

if <on URL scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=88812>
post [I SUPPORT!] as [cool_dude_2 v]
end

cool_dude_2 · 2013-01-26 17:56:16

idea:

if <[{word}]=[{a long list of words of one type}]>
set [type v] to [{word type}]
end

curiouscrab · 2013-01-26 18:35:28

I support, although the Scratch Team would have a lot of programming to do. That would be adding every single word in the English world (real, not slang). That could be a whole Scratch Version or something.

lalala3 · 2013-01-26 22:32:56

curiouscrab wrote:
I support, although the Scratch Team would have a lot of programming to do. That would be adding every single word in the English world (real, not slang). That could be a whole Scratch Version or something.

No, just a set of really long text files. Not a problem.

Greenatic · 2013-01-27 08:13:05

Thanks for the support! smile

KrIsMa · 2013-01-27 14:21:58

cool_dude_2 wrote:

if <on URL scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=88812>
post [I SUPPORT!] as [cool_dude_2 v]
end

Waa, I am not sure, but that may be necroposting, but I still think this post is still relevent.

funelephant · 2013-01-27 14:48:07

I think they could just use dictionary.com, so it would only work online, and censor all the bad words.

Scratch

archived forums

#151 2012-08-21 05:20:28

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

JH1010 wrote:

BirdByte wrote:

#152 2012-08-21 10:05:11

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

#153 2012-08-22 17:47:29

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

#154 2012-08-22 18:10:44

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

zammer990 wrote:

taddl wrote:

#155 2013-01-26 17:52:20

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

#156 2013-01-26 17:56:16

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

#157 2013-01-26 18:35:28

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

#158 2013-01-26 22:32:56

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

curiouscrab wrote:

#159 2013-01-27 08:13:05

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

#160 2013-01-27 14:21:58

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

cool_dude_2 wrote:

#161 2013-01-27 14:48:07

Re: <[ ] is a word?>, (random word), and <[ ] is a [verb v]?>

Board footer