Scratch

What's with the -Tak?

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Firedrake969/2767728

Firedrake969 wrote:

What's with the -Tak?

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Firedrake969/2767728

Ever hear about tokis?

Graphics:
4/10

Some of them are decent, but I think you could do better

Gameplay:
7/10

It's a fun game, but it is only fun for a time. What i'm saying is, you can't play it all day.

Scripting:
8/10

I really like the bouncy velocity.

Overall score:
58/100

Magma-Tak wrote:

Firedrake969 wrote:

What's with the -Tak?

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Firedrake969/2767728

Ever hear about tokis?

Graphics:
4/10

Some of them are decent, but I think you could do better

Gameplay:
7/10

It's a fun game, but it is only fun for a time. What i'm saying is, you can't play it all day.

Scripting:
8/10

I really like the bouncy velocity.

Overall score:
58/100

What's a toki?
How is the scripting not up to par?
WHy isn't it fun for a long time?
How are the graphics bad?
And how is it 58/100 if there are only 30 possible points?  I'm not satisfied..... please explain your review criterion.

Last edited by Firedrake969 (2013-01-25 22:41:28)

Magma-Tak wrote:

Firedrake969 wrote:

What's with the -Tak?

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Firedrake969/2767728

Ever hear about tokis?

Graphics:
4/10

Some of them are decent, but I think you could do better

Gameplay:
7/10

It's a fun game, but it is only fun for a time. What i'm saying is, you can't play it all day.

Scripting:
8/10

I really like the bouncy velocity.

Overall score:
58/100

What's a toki? Ask Maki-Tak
How is the scripting not up to par? Because it is not perfect.
Why isn't it fun for a long time? Because it gets kind of old, not boring.
How are the graphics bad? The walls and green stuff are just lines.
And how is it 58/100 if there are only 30 possible points?  I'm not satisfied..... please explain your review criterion. It's what I think about the game. And the _/100 thing is better than _/30.

numberonegamers wrote:

Magma-Tak wrote:

numberonegamers wrote:

scratch defense, a really cool game

Graphics:
2/10
It was a cool game, kinda need better graphics.

Gameplay:
10/10
An amazingly fun game it is.

Scripting:
8/10
Great scripts.

Overall score:
72/100

Ok, I know graphics suck, but not THAT bad. And how is scripting wrong?

I'm very tough on graphics and the scripting isn't perfect, but it is extreamly good. I'd suggest you make more game like that one.

Sorry I was too lazy to add the other stuff.

Magma-Tak wrote:

Magma-Tak wrote:

Firedrake969 wrote:

What's with the -Tak?

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Firedrake969/2767728

Ever hear about tokis?

Graphics:
4/10

Some of them are decent, but I think you could do better

Gameplay:
7/10

It's a fun game, but it is only fun for a time. What i'm saying is, you can't play it all day.

Scripting:
8/10

I really like the bouncy velocity.

Overall score:
58/100

What's a toki? Ask Maki-Tak
How is the scripting not up to par? Because it is not perfect.
Why isn't it fun for a long time? Because it gets kind of old, not boring.
How are the graphics bad? The walls and green stuff are just lines.
And how is it 58/100 if there are only 30 possible points?  I'm not satisfied..... please explain your review criterion. It's what I think about the game. And the _/100 thing is better than _/30.

Who's Maki-Tak?
How does it get old?
Should the walls be circles or something?   
Please add comments about why you think it only deserves 58 out of 100.  And how is _/100 better than _/30?
And can you review my other game?

Magma-Tak wrote:

Magma-Tak wrote:

Magma-Tak wrote:

Ever hear about tokis?

Graphics:
4/10

Some of them are decent, but I think you could do better

Gameplay:
7/10

It's a fun game, but it is only fun for a time. What i'm saying is, you can't play it all day.

Scripting:
8/10

I really like the bouncy velocity.

Overall score:
58/100

What's a toki? Ask Maki-Tak
How is the scripting not up to par? Because it is not perfect.
Why isn't it fun for a long time? Because it gets kind of old, not boring.
How are the graphics bad? The walls and green stuff are just lines.
And how is it 58/100 if there are only 30 possible points?  I'm not satisfied..... please explain your review criterion. It's what I think about the game. And the _/100 thing is better than _/30.

Who's Maki-Tak? http://scratch.mit.edu/users/Maki-Tak
How does it get old?
Should the walls be circles or something?     nope. they should just be more realistic.
Please add comments about why you think it only deserves 58 out of 100.  And how is _/100 better than _/30? I give tough reviews and I think the _/100 looks cooler.
And can you review my other game? Ok. What's the link?

1.  Uh... lizards?  Uh...
2.  How should they be more realistic?
3.  Can you explain the points given/taken off, then, instead of me just blindly getting it?  It's rather odd when you take random points off w/o explanations.
4.  Why does it look "cooler?"
5.  How isn't the scripting "perfect?"
6.  http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Firedrake969/2964997  Don't score it under graphics or gameplay, just scripting.  This was a random test that got a lot of views, so I think it's pretty good.  xD

Firedrake969 wrote:

Magma-Tak wrote:

Magma-Tak wrote:

What's a toki? Ask Maki-Tak
How is the scripting not up to par? Because it is not perfect.
Why isn't it fun for a long time? Because it gets kind of old, not boring.
How are the graphics bad? The walls and green stuff are just lines.
And how is it 58/100 if there are only 30 possible points?  I'm not satisfied..... please explain your review criterion. It's what I think about the game. And the _/100 thing is better than _/30.

Who's Maki-Tak? http://scratch.mit.edu/users/Maki-Tak
How does it get old?
Should the walls be circles or something?     nope. they should just be more realistic.
Please add comments about why you think it only deserves 58 out of 100.  And how is _/100 better than _/30? I give tough reviews and I think the _/100 looks cooler.
And can you review my other game? Ok. What's the link?

1.  Uh... lizards?  Uh...
2.  How should they be more realistic?
3.  Can you explain the points given/taken off, then, instead of me just blindly getting it?  It's rather odd when you take random points off w/o explanations.
4.  Why does it look "cooler?"
5.  How isn't the scripting "perfect?"
6.  http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Firedrake969/2964997  Don't score it under graphics or gameplay, just scripting.  This was a random test that got a lot of views, so I think it's pretty good.  xD

Graphics:
7/10
They were ok. Liked the shadow.

Gameplay:
7/10
Fun to control.

Scripting:
9/10
I can tell you worked hard.

Overall Score:
69/100
Very good.

Please review METAL.

Could you review Sailing Adventures 2: Plunder please?

Smozzick wrote:

Could you review Sailing Adventures 2: Plunder please?

Graphics:
9/10
well drawn.

Gameplay:
7/10
It's really fun and addicting, but it takes a while to load.

Scripting:
8/10
Pretty good scripts.

Overall score:
78/100