Firedrake969 wrote:
ActionTrev wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
Sorry, no, it seems like an uncredited remix of this.
Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa! Take a look at that one you just suggested, and then look at wariobro's. Donkey Kong is a highly remade game, so you can't just say it's a remix! I'm wariobro's actual brother and I know for a fact that this game was completely original. He even custom made that level! And to be honest, wariobro's project is a heck of a lot better than your 'uncredited remix.'
1. Anybody can say anything on the internet, how do I know?
2. I've seen too many with the same scripts. About 20.
3. He didn't custom make the level.
4. It isn't better or worse.
I find that statement 1 is wrong.
You are true, but you can't just say "anything"! Freedom of speech does have a limit.
That is what is bad about the internet. Whatever you do not say when in real life, you can say on the internet.
The main cause of cyberbullying! Please end it!
Offline
KrIsMa wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
ActionTrev wrote:
Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa! Take a look at that one you just suggested, and then look at wariobro's. Donkey Kong is a highly remade game, so you can't just say it's a remix! I'm wariobro's actual brother and I know for a fact that this game was completely original. He even custom made that level! And to be honest, wariobro's project is a heck of a lot better than your 'uncredited remix.'1. Anybody can say anything on the internet, how do I know?
2. I've seen too many with the same scripts. About 20.
3. He didn't custom make the level.
4. It isn't better or worse.I find that statement 1 is wrong.
You are true, but you can't just say "anything"! Freedom of speech does have a limit.
That is what is bad about the internet. Whatever you do not say when in real life, you can say on the internet.
The main cause of cyberbullying! Please end it!
Please stop minimodding. I can take care of my thread.
Offline
iaoumeur wrote:
Could you review this please? Thanks in advance!
@Programmer_112 It's not an OS or game. Sorry.
The Dot.
GAME:
Originality: 2/10--Platformer. Poison is cool, but it doesn't really do anything different.
Addictiveness/replayability: 6/10--I like platformers. Can't stop them.
Sounds: 0/5--None. Feels like it needs some.
Graphics: 1/5--A dot. The graphics are lines and boxes.
Smoothness of scripts: 10/10
Any bugs/glitches: 4/10
Length (too long/too short): 7/10--Gets rather boring
Ease of use: 8/10--Mainly because no real instructions.
Plot: 7/10--Kind of hard to understand
My comments: 17/20
Hard to say. A platformer with a slight twist.
SCORE: 62/100
PERCENTAGE: 62%
Offline
firedrake969_test wrote:
iaoumeur wrote:
Could you review this please? Thanks in advance!
@Programmer_112 It's not an OS or game. Sorry.
The Dot.
GAME:
Originality: 2/10--Platformer. Poison is cool, but it doesn't really do anything different.
Addictiveness/replayability: 6/10--I like platformers. Can't stop them.
Sounds: 0/5--None. Feels like it needs some.
Graphics: 1/5--A dot. The graphics are lines and boxes.
Smoothness of scripts: 10/10
Any bugs/glitches: 4/10
Length (too long/too short): 7/10--Gets rather boring
Ease of use: 8/10--Mainly because no real instructions.
Plot: 7/10--Kind of hard to understand
My comments: 17/20
Hard to say. A platformer with a slight twist.
SCORE: 62/100
PERCENTAGE: 62%
Thanks!
Offline
I'd like you to review all of these in this gallery please.
Offline
@Programmer_112 It's not an OS or game. Sorry.
Sorry to waste your time with this. Must have been really tired last night.
Offline
sonicfan12p wrote:
I'd like you to review all of these in this gallery please.
Sorry, choose one.
Offline
Firedrake969 wrote:
sonicfan12p wrote:
I'd like you to review all of these in this gallery please.
Sorry, choose one.
It makes the most sense if you do all four, but if I can only have one, do number four.
Offline
firedrake969_test wrote:
Please stop minimodding. I can take care of my thread.
I wouldn't call that mini-modding - since that isn't something that a mod would say. You might counter the points as being not relevant to the conversation - or not helpful to your main argument - but please don't call it mini-modding.
Offline
Paddle2See wrote:
firedrake969_test wrote:
Please stop minimodding. I can take care of my thread.
I wouldn't call that mini-modding - since that isn't something that a mod would say. You might counter the points as being not relevant to the conversation - or not helpful to your main argument - but please don't call it mini-modding.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
Offline
Hey, since I am on your topic now, could you review my game "Music Catcher"? Haha after that previous post, I am now not affected by bad ratings (even though I don't think you are those people )
Thanks in advance!
Offline
KrIsMa wrote:
Hey, since I am on your topic now, could you review my game "Music Catcher"? Haha after that previous post, I am now not affected by bad ratings (even though I don't think you are those people )
Thanks in advance!
GAME:
Originality: 8/10--Very good.
Addictiveness/replayability: 7/10
Sounds: 5/5
Graphics: 3/5--Mainly the basket, and the transfer to instructions and to the game was too slow; points for the notes! Couldn't see the square.
Smoothness of scripts: 8/10--Taken off for the transfer to the game and instructions.
Any bugs/glitches: 10/10--None.
Length (too long/too short): 8/10--Nice, however, should be more twists. W/O the twists, the game is too long. It doesn't seem like it gets harder.
Ease of use: 10/10
Plot: 3/10--I think there should be one.
My comments: 13/20
Very nice game. Absolutely no bugs and glitches, scripts were supremely smooth. However, I think now you could work on powerups and powerdowns. I liked the graph idea.
SCORE: 75/100
PERCENTAGE: 75%
Offline
sonicfan12p wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
sonicfan12p wrote:
I'd like you to review all of these in this gallery please.
Sorry, choose one.
It makes the most sense if you do all four, but if I can only have one, do number four.
Did you miss this?
Offline
sonicfan12p wrote:
sonicfan12p wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
Sorry, choose one.
It makes the most sense if you do all four, but if I can only have one, do number four.
Did you miss this?
No, I haven't had time.
Offline
firedrake969_test wrote:
sonicfan12p wrote:
sonicfan12p wrote:
It makes the most sense if you do all four, but if I can only have one, do number four.Did you miss this?
No, I haven't had time.
Alright, just wondering.
Offline
GAME:
Originality: 7/10--Platformer with a twist.
Addictiveness/replayability: 7/10--After a while, the torch is annoyingly small.
Sounds: 3/5--Repetetive
Graphics: 2/5--The background was good; the level itself was pixely.
Smoothness of scripts: 7/10--You didn't make the platformer base.
Any bugs/glitches: 5/10--The torch overlapped the exit, and slope detection wasn't really there.
Length (too long/too short): 8/10--Nice, however, should be more twists. W/O the twists, the game is too long. It doesn't seem like it gets harder.
Ease of use: 6/10--No instructions
Plot: 7/10--
My comments: 16/20
I liked it. However, the torch should be bigger and stay by the character at all times.
SCORE: 68/100
PERCENTAGE: 68%
Offline
could you review this please?
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/fredmaster45/3031010
Offline
bonechill wrote:
bonechill wrote:
Can you review red dot and red dot 2?
ahem
No time.
Offline
Today's the day to update the Top Ten list, post your top two of this week there please!
Offline