This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#26 2013-01-15 20:42:52

soupoftomato
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

banana500 wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

Necromaster wrote:


Well, Gimli is the son of Gloin. And the ring is really important. And there is the Necromancer/Sauron in Dol Goldur. That's three ways, I think, other than the fact that it's set in the same world.

The Necromancer isn't even in the book, though...?

And I think there's lots of connections as well as the aforementioned, especially recurring characters (Gandalf, Bilbo, Elrond, Gollum).

Tolkien pretty much had the whole thing planned out from the start. He wrote The Hobbit with LOTR in mind, even though he did write The Hobbit first. So technically, it is not a prequel, LOTR is a sequel.  tongue

I read the Note from the Author or whatever and I think he said he just "decided to use the ring as the connecting point" when he chose to write a sequel so wouldn't that mean he didn't plan it all?


I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos

Offline

 

#27 2013-01-15 20:43:33

veggieman001
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

dav99 wrote:

banana500 wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:


The Necromancer isn't even in the book, though...?

And I think there's lots of connections as well as the aforementioned, especially recurring characters (Gandalf, Bilbo, Elrond, Gollum).

Tolkien pretty much had the whole thing planned out from the start. He wrote The Hobbit with LOTR in mind, even though he did write The Hobbit first. So technically, it is not a prequel, LOTR is a sequel.  tongue

I meant main things that connect. The Necromancer is mentioned in the Hobbit, when Gandalf explains why he was gone during part of the book. Though, the story of what happened to Gandalf with the Necromancer was not explained in the Hobbit, it will be in the movie. Lastly, The Lord of the Rings is not a sequel to the Hobbit because, again, they are completely original and different stories. I do agree with you, though, that the Hobbit was used to set up The Lord of the Rings.

-To banana500, veggieman001, and Necromaster

It is a sequel though. Based on events in The Hobbit, it's events following it. It was written as the sequel, too. (@ jukyter: actually, he hadn't written it yet)


Posts: 20000 - Show all posts

Offline

 

#28 2013-01-15 20:44:44

soupoftomato
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

Mokat wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

What do other nerds think?

MEAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  tongue

I just sort of cringed when I read it.


I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos

Offline

 

#29 2013-01-16 05:30:29

Hardmath123
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

Oh, so now you're just discriminating against le nerds.  sad

EDIT: actually, it should be des nerds, but that would ruin the effect.

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2013-01-16 05:30:59)


Hardmaths-MacBook-Pro:~ Hardmath$ sudo make $(whoami) a sandwich

Offline

 

#30 2013-01-16 13:51:30

soupoftomato
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

Hardmath123 wrote:

Oh, so now you're just discriminating against le nerds.  sad

EDIT: actually, it should be des nerds, but that would ruin the effect.

What?

No. I'm "nerdy" but I just
it's a strange word that I don't like using!

Like having that be how you refer to yourself is awkward.

(and there was no effect with the le, just remove the French entirely)


I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos

Offline

 

#31 2013-01-16 14:07:14

maxskywalker
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

luiysia wrote:

well I started the silmarillion but really did anyone here actually read that all the way through

I did.  How I did is something of a mystery.

Offline

 

#32 2013-01-16 14:42:53

muppetds
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-02-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

I've got a old copy of the LOTR and ive read it several times...


SCRATCH'S PARTLY INSANE RESIDENT 
http://internetometer.com/imagesmall/31691.pnghttp://bluetetrarpg.x10.mx/usercard/?name=muppetds

Offline

 

#33 2013-01-16 14:54:34

yousmiledatme
New Scratcher
Registered: 2012-09-26
Posts: 100+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

veggieman001 wrote:

dav99 wrote:

banana500 wrote:

Tolkien pretty much had the whole thing planned out from the start. He wrote The Hobbit with LOTR in mind, even though he did write The Hobbit first. So technically, it is not a prequel, LOTR is a sequel.  tongue

I meant main things that connect. The Necromancer is mentioned in the Hobbit, when Gandalf explains why he was gone during part of the book. Though, the story of what happened to Gandalf with the Necromancer was not explained in the Hobbit, it will be in the movie. Lastly, The Lord of the Rings is not a sequel to the Hobbit because, again, they are completely original and different stories. I do agree with you, though, that the Hobbit was used to set up The Lord of the Rings.

-To banana500, veggieman001, and Necromaster

It is a sequel though. Based on events in The Hobbit, it's events following it. It was written as the sequel, too. (@ jukyter: actually, he hadn't written it yet)

it was a couple of years after the hobbit was published
i think i got this from the foreword to my copy of the hobbit

Offline

 

#34 2013-01-16 14:58:29

soupoftomato
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

maxskywalker wrote:

luiysia wrote:

well I started the silmarillion but really did anyone here actually read that all the way through

I did.  How I did is something of a mystery.

I heard it was like trying to read the Bible all the way through for fun.


I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos

Offline

 

#35 2013-01-16 15:48:47

dontbombiraq
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-08-26
Posts: 100+

Re: Reading Lord of the Rings...

Just got one thing to say, y'all
Dune was harder

Last edited by dontbombiraq (2013-01-16 15:49:00)


http://i39.tinypic.com/259j2mu.png

Offline

 

Board footer