This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#51 2013-01-06 21:23:02

dontbombiraq
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-08-26
Posts: 100+

Re: Underratedness.

sanddude wrote:

Sausagefanclub wrote:

I think real music is underrated; everyone's into rap with foul language in it nowadays.  hmm

YES! BECAUSE FOUL LANGUAGE REMOVES ALL ARTISTIC CREDIBILITY!

FOR EXAMPLE, NAS IS A FANTASTIC RAPPER WHO CAN TELL AMAZING STORIES WITH INCREDIBLE FLOW BUT HE USED THE BAD POTTY MOUTH WORDS! AND IT OFFENDS ME!

SAME GOES FOR MOVIES! ALL MOVIES THAT HAVE FOUL LANGUAGE ARE EVIL, AND NOT REAL MOVIES! THE GODFATHER USED THE BAD POTTY MOUTH WORDS. NEVERMIND THAT IT'S ONE OF THE GREATEST AND MOST ICONIC FILMS OF ALL-TIME, IT USED BAD LANGUAGE! THAT'S INAPPROPRIATE!

Although, in all seriousness how is "real music" (if you're going to be snobby enough to call it that" underrated, if half the people are agreeing with you like "Yep the hippity hop sucks derp."

Everyone forgets Lil B.  sad


http://i39.tinypic.com/259j2mu.png

Offline

 

#52 2013-01-06 21:29:26

lalala3
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-10-03
Posts: 100+

Re: Underratedness.

sanddude wrote:

Fudge it all! Fudge this world!
Fudge everything that you stand for!
Don't belong! Don't exist!
Don't give a poo! Don't ever judge me!
And don't you fudgin' judge me

You know, I just realized how funny this sounds when translated into non-curse speech. Mainly, I noticed that there would be quite a lot of... procreation to be had on the part of the audience. As in, a lot.


http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/9374/signature2nt.png

Offline

 

#53 2013-01-06 21:40:41

veggieman001
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: Underratedness.

lalala3 wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

Yes, artists can choose to express their emotions by using clean language sometimes, but I believe that sometimes it just can't get the point across enough; if you hear profanity in a song, aren't you more likely to pay attention and have some sort of reaction to that? In this society, obscenity may be used to effectively express intense anger, frustration, and other feelings the artist may want to stir up in the listener, and people will understand that..

There was a time.
Then it all went wrong...

--Fantine from the Les Miserables musical

You're right; that's an example where profanity is not required. However, I wasn't arguing that profanity is always required. Someone arguing against me would have to prove that profanity is never required.

ImagineIt wrote:

lalala3 wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

But the point is that that's not always the case.

Why would someone add swear words for any other reason? For that reason, why would someone do it at all in a song?

Songs only? What about real life? Oh my goodness. I hear those annoying words everywhere I go, and if I had the choice to have any superpower I wanted, the ability for all of those word to be muted or blocked out would have some serious consideration.

Why? Why do you let the words, being just words, mean so much?

Last edited by veggieman001 (2013-01-06 21:41:39)


Posts: 20000 - Show all posts

Offline

 

#54 2013-01-06 22:03:09

ImagineIt
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-02-28
Posts: 1000+

Re: Underratedness.

veggieman001 wrote:

lalala3 wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

Yes, artists can choose to express their emotions by using clean language sometimes, but I believe that sometimes it just can't get the point across enough; if you hear profanity in a song, aren't you more likely to pay attention and have some sort of reaction to that? In this society, obscenity may be used to effectively express intense anger, frustration, and other feelings the artist may want to stir up in the listener, and people will understand that..

There was a time.
Then it all went wrong...

--Fantine from the Les Miserables musical

You're right; that's an example where profanity is not required. However, I wasn't arguing that profanity is always required. Someone arguing against me would have to prove that profanity is never required.

ImagineIt wrote:

lalala3 wrote:


Why would someone add swear words for any other reason? For that reason, why would someone do it at all in a song?

Songs only? What about real life? Oh my goodness. I hear those annoying words everywhere I go, and if I had the choice to have any superpower I wanted, the ability for all of those word to be muted or blocked out would have some serious consideration.

Why? Why do you let the words, being just words, mean so much?

I'll quote myself:
When I heard what the f-word actually meant, I was disgusted...

And some words are just offensive, such as the N word.

Offline

 

#55 2013-01-06 22:04:43

lalala3
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-10-03
Posts: 100+

Re: Underratedness.

veggieman001 wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

lalala3 wrote:

Why would someone add swear words for any other reason? For that reason, why would someone do it at all in a song?

Songs only? What about real life? Oh my goodness. I hear those annoying words everywhere I go, and if I had the choice to have any superpower I wanted, the ability for all of those word to be muted or blocked out would have some serious consideration.

Why? Why do you let the words, being just words, mean so much?

Because people are referring to sexual intercourse and feces with strange frequency in regular conversation, when said conversation may or may not have anything to do with such topics. For example: person is fired: "[a certain synonym for "copulate" repeated three to fifteen times] [synonym for feces], I'm [the state of having had coition with another]"

Last edited by lalala3 (2013-01-06 22:05:26)


http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/9374/signature2nt.png

Offline

 

#56 2013-01-06 22:17:39

sanddude
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-29
Posts: 1000+

Re: Underratedness.

ImagineIt wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

lalala3 wrote:


There was a time.
Then it all went wrong...

--Fantine from the Les Miserables musical

You're right; that's an example where profanity is not required. However, I wasn't arguing that profanity is always required. Someone arguing against me would have to prove that profanity is never required.

ImagineIt wrote:

Songs only? What about real life? Oh my goodness. I hear those annoying words everywhere I go, and if I had the choice to have any superpower I wanted, the ability for all of those word to be muted or blocked out would have some serious consideration.

Why? Why do you let the words, being just words, mean so much?

I'll quote myself:
When I heard what the f-word actually meant, I was disgusted...

And some words are just offensive, such as the N word.

That disgusting thing is the reason that you, me, and everybody around you were created, and it's also led to some of the most awesome jokes ever. Unless it's being used to insult or degrade you, there's no reason to be offended by it. Same for most other bad words; "You are a piece of [removed]*" is something fair to get offended by, but "Oh [removed] I stubbed my toe" isn't.

I agree about the N word but that's on a different level, given it's historical context.

Last edited by cheddargirl (2013-01-07 01:52:24)


http://www.bronyland.com/images/quiz/banner_rainbowdash.jpg

Offline

 

#57 2013-01-06 22:32:06

sanddude
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-29
Posts: 1000+

Re: Underratedness.

Also about the bad songwriting, you can give examples of songs that express their emotions well without swear words, but not all songs are the same therefore certian songs will need things that others don't to work.

Again, I agree that overusing swear words or using them when they aren't necessary is bad songwriting, and I'd redirect anybody who does that to this this. But plenty of great songs use swear words correctly to where they are used to express the emotions are most certainly necessary. Being offended by swear words when they aren't use to insult or degrade you is simply asinine and it's some of the most idiotic logic I've ever come across.


http://www.bronyland.com/images/quiz/banner_rainbowdash.jpg

Offline

 

#58 2013-01-06 22:53:31

RoyalHi5
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-07-15
Posts: 500+

Re: Underratedness.

sanddude wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:


You're right; that's an example where profanity is not required. However, I wasn't arguing that profanity is always required. Someone arguing against me would have to prove that profanity is never required.


Why? Why do you let the words, being just words, mean so much?

I'll quote myself:
When I heard what the f-word actually meant, I was disgusted...

And some words are just offensive, such as the N word.

That disgusting thing is the reason that you, me, and everybody around you were created, and it's also led to some of the most awesome jokes ever. Unless it's being used to insult or degrade you, there's no reason to be offended by it. Same for most other bad words; "You are a piece of [removed]" is something fair to get offended by, but "Oh [removed] I stubbed my toe" isn't.

I agree about the N word but that's on a different level, given it's historical context.

I couldn't have said it better myself

Last edited by cheddargirl (2013-01-07 01:53:00)


http://data.whicdn.com/images/36639937/air-monochrome-air-angel-anime-black-boy-cute-girl-kamio-musuzu-kunisaki-yukito-monochrome-wings-anime-499x311_large.jpg Think of what could be; not of what is

Offline

 

#59 2013-01-06 22:55:34

RoyalHi5
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-07-15
Posts: 500+

Re: Underratedness.

This has gotten really off topic and has been taken to a PG-13 rating. I'm perfectly fine with PG-13 but young Scratchers might not be so can we redirect this forum topic to where it's supposed to be? This isn't the youtube comment section 0.0


http://data.whicdn.com/images/36639937/air-monochrome-air-angel-anime-black-boy-cute-girl-kamio-musuzu-kunisaki-yukito-monochrome-wings-anime-499x311_large.jpg Think of what could be; not of what is

Offline

 

#60 2013-01-06 23:25:24

lalala3
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-10-03
Posts: 100+

Re: Underratedness.

sanddude wrote:

"You are a piece of [removed]" is something fair to get offended by, but "Oh [removed] I stubbed my toe" isn't.

It's tossing around a swear word like it's nothing. There was a time, when if you said that, everyone in the room would stare like you as if you were nuts. There was a time when topics such as mating affairs were only mentioned rarely, and only if it was relevant. Apparently, they are now somehow connected to everything in life, and an improbably high number of things seem to warrant an exclamation of one or more things directly related to reproduction.

RoyalHi5 wrote:

This has gotten really off topic and has been taken to a PG-13 rating. I'm perfectly fine with PG-13 but young Scratchers might not be so can we redirect this forum topic to where it's supposed to be? This isn't the youtube comment section 0.0

Most people would ignore it, but that was a big mistake (or rather, an error. For now.). There is a reason why, if you don't want to offend someone else by hanging up (or just offend them less), you do it while you're talking, as opposed to while they are. The same principle (or a similar) applies here, so I don't think I, at least, will go back on topic until this debate is all settled. It is disrespectful to just say something for your side and then try to shut the argument down. You just don't do that.

Last edited by cheddargirl (2013-01-07 01:53:27)


http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/9374/signature2nt.png

Offline

 

#61 2013-01-06 23:40:19

RoyalHi5
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-07-15
Posts: 500+

Re: Underratedness.

lalala3 wrote:

sanddude wrote:

"You are a piece of [removed]" is something fair to get offended by, but "Oh [removed] I stubbed my toe" isn't.

It's tossing around a swear word like it's nothing. There was a time, when if you said that, everyone in the room would stare like you as if you were nuts. There was a time when topics such as mating affairs were only mentioned rarely, and only if it was relevant. Apparently, they are now somehow connected to everything in life, and an improbably high number of things seem to warrant an exclamation of one or more things directly related to reproduction.

RoyalHi5 wrote:

This has gotten really off topic and has been taken to a PG-13 rating. I'm perfectly fine with PG-13 but young Scratchers might not be so can we redirect this forum topic to where it's supposed to be? This isn't the youtube comment section 0.0

Most people would ignore it, but that was a big mistake (or rather, an error. For now.). There is a reason why, if you don't want to offend someone else by hanging up (or just offend them less), you do it while you're talking, as opposed to while they are. The same principle (or a similar) applies here, so I don't think I, at least, will go back on topic until this debate is all settled. It is disrespectful to just say something for your side and then try to shut the argument down. You just don't do that.

I know it wasn't the best thing to say, but someone had to say it. I'm not trying to offend anyone or be disrespectful or anything like that and I'm sorry if I came off that way. I just didn't think it was fair to all the other scratchers who are trying really hard to keep this site okay for very young people. Maybe I phrased the comment wrong because it was meant to be an opinion and just a suggestion, not an order.

Last edited by cheddargirl (2013-01-07 01:53:51)


http://data.whicdn.com/images/36639937/air-monochrome-air-angel-anime-black-boy-cute-girl-kamio-musuzu-kunisaki-yukito-monochrome-wings-anime-499x311_large.jpg Think of what could be; not of what is

Offline

 

#62 2013-01-06 23:45:39

sanddude
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-29
Posts: 1000+

Re: Underratedness.

lalala3 wrote:

sanddude wrote:

"You are a piece of [removed]" is something fair to get offended by, but "Oh [removed] I stubbed my toe" isn't.

It's tossing around a swear word like it's nothing. There was a time, when if you said that, everyone in the room would stare like you as if you were nuts. There was a time when topics such as mating affairs were only mentioned rarely, and only if it was relevant. Apparently, they are now somehow connected to everything in life, and an improbably high number of things seem to warrant an exclamation of one or more things directly related to reproduction.

RoyalHi5 wrote:

This has gotten really off topic and has been taken to a PG-13 rating. I'm perfectly fine with PG-13 but young Scratchers might not be so can we redirect this forum topic to where it's supposed to be? This isn't the youtube comment section 0.0

Most people would ignore it, but that was a big mistake (or rather, an error. For now.). There is a reason why, if you don't want to offend someone else by hanging up (or just offend them less), you do it while you're talking, as opposed to while they are. The same principle (or a similar) applies here, so I don't think I, at least, will go back on topic until this debate is all settled. It is disrespectful to just say something for your side and then try to shut the argument down. You just don't do that.

We toss around swear words like they are nothing because they are nothing.

Last edited by cheddargirl (2013-01-07 01:54:13)


http://www.bronyland.com/images/quiz/banner_rainbowdash.jpg

Offline

 

#63 2013-01-07 01:51:52

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: Underratedness.

This has gone on rather too far. I think it's time to close the thread.


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

Board footer