Scratch

bananaman114 · 2012-12-30 01:49:10

87, 563, 325, 24, 824

whizzer · 2012-12-30 08:01:11

10, 32456, 782, 12, 42

BuddyM · 2012-12-30 08:29:52

290, 87, 2, 3400, 1789

Last edited by BuddyM (2012-12-30 08:30:39)

Servine · 2012-12-30 16:28:44

43 32 83 70 9265

TRocket · 2012-12-30 16:33:38

6, 94, 38, 74, 2

bobbybee · 2012-12-30 16:38:48

64, 128, 17, 65, 92

Nomolos · 2012-12-30 16:46:08

60403465, 354342, 436254, 623, 1112.

RedRocker227 · 2012-12-30 22:22:40

47
122
98
442
1003

RedRocker227 · 2012-12-30 22:23:52

kayybee wrote:
1 2 3 4 5.

gabric wrote:
random

BlackKyurem · 2012-12-30 22:39:23

46 79 23 17 8

Necromaster · 2012-12-31 00:49:13

1, 4, 987, 89, 0

zubblewu · 2012-12-31 00:50:28

Necromaster wrote:
0

not a natural number

jontmy00 · 2012-12-31 03:36:54

472. 928. 104. 184. 508.

scratchisthebest · 2012-12-31 08:09:47

48 37 86 19 3.

Are you planning to make some chart of the results? Those are neat: they never come out even.

technoguyx · 2012-12-31 17:42:52

I still don't get what kind of experiment can be done with this.

56, 77, 42, 20, 9

kayybee · 2012-12-31 17:50:35

RedRocker227 wrote:
kayybee wrote:
1 2 3 4 5.
gabric wrote:
random

technically, it's random since its a possible 5 number combination.
like if I said choose a random number from 1-10 1 could be random even though its a boundary
if I said use the letters of cat to make a "word" possibilities would be atc tca act etc and it would include cat, and that would possibly be selected "randomly"

just because they're the first five natural numbers in order doesn't mean they're not random

werdna123 · 2012-12-31 18:21:57

7 19 92 27 36

werdna123 · 2012-12-31 18:23:09

kayybee wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
kayybee wrote:
1 2 3 4 5.
gabric wrote:
random
technically, it's random since its a possible 5 number combination.
like if I said choose a random number from 1-10 1 could be random even though its a boundary
if I said use the letters of cat to make a "word" possibilities would be atc tca act etc and it would include cat, and that would possibly be selected "randomly"

just because they're the first five natural numbers in order doesn't mean they're not random

yes but you didn't go "hmm first number... 1" then "hmm... next number... 2" you did them in that order on purpose.

dontbombiraq · 2012-12-31 18:27:38

werdna123 wrote:
kayybee wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
kayybee wrote:
1 2 3 4 5.
technically, it's random since its a possible 5 number combination.
like if I said choose a random number from 1-10 1 could be random even though its a boundary
if I said use the letters of cat to make a "word" possibilities would be atc tca act etc and it would include cat, and that would possibly be selected "randomly"

just because they're the first five natural numbers in order doesn't mean they're not random
yes but you didn't go "hmm first number... 1" then "hmm... next number... 2" you did them in that order on purpose.

irrelevant

kayybee · 2012-12-31 18:28:59

werdna123 wrote:
kayybee wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
kayybee wrote:
1 2 3 4 5.
technically, it's random since its a possible 5 number combination.
like if I said choose a random number from 1-10 1 could be random even though its a boundary
if I said use the letters of cat to make a "word" possibilities would be atc tca act etc and it would include cat, and that would possibly be selected "randomly"

just because they're the first five natural numbers in order doesn't mean they're not random
yes but you didn't go "hmm first number... 1" then "hmm... next number... 2" you did them in that order on purpose.

I chose a random combination of 5 numbers

technically choosing 5 numbers is essentially choosing 5 random numbers

if I can't choose 1-5 because they're special does that mean people can't choose 666 because it has meaning and other numbers that aren't apparently "random"?

for all we know wait we don't know anything about what the numbers are going to be used for

RedRocker227 · 2012-12-31 22:08:46

werdna123 wrote:
kayybee wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
kayybee wrote:
1 2 3 4 5.
technically, it's random since its a possible 5 number combination.
like if I said choose a random number from 1-10 1 could be random even though its a boundary
if I said use the letters of cat to make a "word" possibilities would be atc tca act etc and it would include cat, and that would possibly be selected "randomly"

just because they're the first five natural numbers in order doesn't mean they're not random
yes but you didn't go "hmm first number... 1" then "hmm... next number... 2" you did them in that order on purpose.

Yeah

You clearly thought "I'm going to post the first five consecutive numbers", making it not random, since you're deliberately making a pattern with your numbers

Luigitailsdoll45 · 2012-12-31 22:41:54

42,64, 360, 1081, 720

Last edited by Luigitailsdoll45 (2012-12-31 22:42:18)

kayybee · 2013-01-01 01:46:42

RedRocker227 wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
kayybee wrote:

technically, it's random since its a possible 5 number combination.
like if I said choose a random number from 1-10 1 could be random even though its a boundary
if I said use the letters of cat to make a "word" possibilities would be atc tca act etc and it would include cat, and that would possibly be selected "randomly"

just because they're the first five natural numbers in order doesn't mean they're not random
yes but you didn't go "hmm first number... 1" then "hmm... next number... 2" you did them in that order on purpose.
Yeah

You clearly thought "I'm going to post the first five consecutive numbers", making it not random, since you're deliberately making a pattern with your numbers

and patterns are not random right?

because its not one of the possible choices of 5 natural numbers

mythbusteranimator · 2013-01-01 11:47:09

kayybee wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
werdna123 wrote:

yes but you didn't go "hmm first number... 1" then "hmm... next number... 2" you did them in that order on purpose.
Yeah

You clearly thought "I'm going to post the first five consecutive numbers", making it not random, since you're deliberately making a pattern with your numbers
and patterns are not random right?

because its not one of the possible choices of 5 natural numbers

Thought of by a human, for example, "4444" is not random, it would be thought of as a pattern.

But by a machine, generated by a random program, it stays random.

bananaman114 · 2013-01-02 17:28:15

mythbusteranimator wrote:
kayybee wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:

Yeah

You clearly thought "I'm going to post the first five consecutive numbers", making it not random, since you're deliberately making a pattern with your numbers
and patterns are not random right?

because its not one of the possible choices of 5 natural numbers
Thought of by a human, for example, "4444" is not random, it would be thought of as a pattern.

But by a machine, generated by a random program, it stays random.

there are no TRUE random number generators, they are algorithms and generate numbers based on a pattern
some of the best random number generators base their numbers off of outside sound or wind so it is veery close to random

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2012-12-30 01:49:10

Re: A number expiriment

#27 2012-12-30 08:01:11

Re: A number expiriment

#28 2012-12-30 08:29:52

Re: A number expiriment

#29 2012-12-30 16:28:44

Re: A number expiriment

#30 2012-12-30 16:33:38

Re: A number expiriment

#31 2012-12-30 16:38:48

Re: A number expiriment

#32 2012-12-30 16:46:08

Re: A number expiriment

#33 2012-12-30 22:22:40

Re: A number expiriment

#34 2012-12-30 22:23:52

Re: A number expiriment

kayybee wrote:

gabric wrote:

#35 2012-12-30 22:39:23

Re: A number expiriment

#36 2012-12-31 00:49:13

Re: A number expiriment

#37 2012-12-31 00:50:28

Re: A number expiriment

Necromaster wrote:

#38 2012-12-31 03:36:54

Re: A number expiriment

#39 2012-12-31 08:09:47

Re: A number expiriment

#40 2012-12-31 17:42:52

Re: A number expiriment

#41 2012-12-31 17:50:35

Re: A number expiriment

RedRocker227 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

gabric wrote:

#42 2012-12-31 18:21:57

Re: A number expiriment

#43 2012-12-31 18:23:09

Re: A number expiriment

kayybee wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

gabric wrote:

#44 2012-12-31 18:27:38

Re: A number expiriment

werdna123 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

#45 2012-12-31 18:28:59

Re: A number expiriment

werdna123 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

#46 2012-12-31 22:08:46

Re: A number expiriment

werdna123 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

#47 2012-12-31 22:41:54

Re: A number expiriment

#48 2013-01-01 01:46:42

Re: A number expiriment

RedRocker227 wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

kayybee wrote:

#49 2013-01-01 11:47:09

Re: A number expiriment

kayybee wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

#50 2013-01-02 17:28:15

Re: A number expiriment