Scratch

Simulations leaderboard

Generation 4001 GOLD
by Borrego6165 [Sim]

Performance: 9/10

Quality: 10/10

Accuracy: 8/10

Entertainment: 9/10

Length: 10/10

Features: 9/10

Idea: 9/10

Problems: 9/10

Clarity: 7/10

My overall opinion: 9/10

OVERALL 89/100

Comment: Mother of god... I played Generation 3000 which was great and now I see a game better, exponentially. Though it is yet not a perfect game. It is pretty complicated and takes quite long, though looks like a normal game you find in a video game store!

You didn't score too high in clarity, because when i was playing it took me VERY long until I found out how to get a positive profit, lots of players had same problems. Maybe you should clarify in the project?

Last edited by ExtremelyGamer (2013-01-09 11:23:14)

Looks far less complicated, no time now, review it tomorrow!

please review my F1 2012(link in my signature)

Last edited by prokohtu (2012-12-30 16:14:27)

This! http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/fillergames/2913466

Simulations leaderboard

Generation- 3000
by Borrego6165 [Sim]

Performance: 9/10

Quality: 8/10

Accuracy: 8/10

Entertainment: 8/10

Length: 9/10

Features: 9/10

Idea: 9/10

Problems: 8/10

Clarity: 8/10

My overall opinion: 8/10

OVERALL 84/100

Comments: Though has not as good graphics, but actually is less complicated and more simple! Of course I can't really tell you how to improve it as it's a prequel, but in my idea I think it's an excellent game, for your sequel of the game you should keep it as simple and possibly don't increase the space too much! Very Good Game!

Last edited by ExtremelyGamer (2013-01-09 11:25:06)

ExtremelyGamer wrote:

Generation- 3000
by Borrego6165

Performance: 9/10
What! This is one point faster than Generation:4001? But this lags heavily, G:4001 doesn't! Either make this less than G:4001 or increase the G:4001 points to higher than this. I can't believe I'm saying this, but you've upset me by scoring it so high 

Quality: 8/10

Professionalism: 8/10

Glitches: 9/10

Entertainment: 8/10
I'm guessing this is because of the alien disaster, tornado, and the drive modes which were unavailable in G:4001. Fair enough.

Playability: 8/10
I'm surprised, what made G:4001 great was that all the buildings could function. Here, only a couple of buildings actually did what they were supposed to do and properly! I suppose that the in-game manual helps make this more playable though.

Good difficulty: 8/10
Did the in-game manual help bring this up? Don't forget that G:4001 has improved start-money options (these were more random) and that it also included an advisor who could give you help in the game by clicking on him. He always gave out prioritised help, and there was a manual available on the internet. So, I don't get how this is higher.

Good plot: 7/10

Completion: 9/10
I understand that this looks a little unfinished, but I don't get how G:4001 is the same "polishedness" of this? If anything, G:4001 is fully polished, with all the graphics and interfaces cleaned up, the right music, loads of sound effects and the same amount of glitches you'd get in a professional game.

My overall opinion: 9/10

OVERALL 81/100

Comments: Though has not as good graphics, but actually is less complicated and more simple! Of course I can't really tell you how to improve it as it's a prequel, but in my idea I think it's an excellent game, for your sequel of the game you should keep it as simple and possibly don't increase the space too much! Very Good Game!

I'm not upset, as this has really opened my eyes to what a good city building game is. You said about land space though. On here, you had 97 tiles, which meant that you couldn't even build a village. In 4001, there were 11025, but if you wanted to you could just build in the top corner and forget about the rest.

Also, there were less buildings in G:4001, and G:4001 did not have research mode, 'evil' buildings, or as many education buildings such as the museum, college and library. So actually the game simplified, but you had less to worry about, it only looked more complicated because I gave the player more options such as the music playlist, speed change, and more.

ExtremelyGamer wrote:

Generation: 4001 GOLD
by Borrego6165

Performance: 7/10

Quality: 10/10

Professionalism: 9/10

Glitches: 9/10

Entertainment: 9/10

Playability: 8/10

Good difficulty: 8/10

Good plot: 8/10

Completion: 9/10

My overall opinion: 9/10

OVERALL 87/100

Comment: 2nd review. It scored lower in performance then 3000 because the game didn't work too well in flash (lag, can't really play), but it worked well offline. I raised the score in most of them as I understood how to play. I'll keep Generation 3000 the same.

ExtremelyGamer wrote:

Swords and Sorcery
by Programmer_112

Performance: 8/10

Quality: 7/10

Professionalism: 7/10

Glitches: 8/10

Entertainment: 8/10

Playability: 8/10

Good difficulty: 8/10

Good plot: 8/10

Completion: 9/10

My overall opinion: 7/10

OVERALL 78/100

Comments: The game worked well. Though, it doesn't look too professional and doesn't have a title screen. The shop didn't really work as when i attempted to buy something it only said do you want to buy more and then I said y and then it went to shop main screen. Adventure worked very well, but maybe was too easy. It was a good game apart from the shop, which i couldn't figure out.

Thanks!  I didn't know of any bugs, so I will fix this soon.  It's good to know what you thought of my game.

Could you review this project please? Bounce

Thank you!

Love this idea!!!

Could you please review this project http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/minecraftpe123/2918239.

Firedrake969 wrote:

You may want to include different rubrics, because I have not just games, but OSes, algorithms, and other stuff.

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Firedrake969/2767728

I know that. I have projects to review and enjoy new year. I will probably have the new criteria by the 3rd.

Please... No more. Are you sure you need to have all of them reviewed?

Last edited by ExtremelyGamer (2012-12-31 11:24:22)

Game leaderboard

EXTREME Asteroid Dodge
by ScratchMaster106 [game]

Performance: 10/10

Quality: 6/10

Professionalism: 7/10

Glitches: 9/10

Entertainment: 7/10

Playability: 7/10

Good difficulty: 7/10

Good plot: 8/10

Completion: 9/10

My overall opinion: 7/10

OVERALL 77/100

Comments: As I've seen a couple people mention it, you need to randomise the direction of asteroids, as there are spots on the screen that asteroids don't hit you. The title screen could be improved, cause the red and blue hurt my eyes. Overall I think it's a great start to a game and after some extra great work it could be very successful!

Last edited by ExtremelyGamer (2013-01-09 11:08:51)