Scratch

Come to think of it, should we just use JsScratch instead (with their permission, of course)? Why create something new when the same thing is further along then we are? Then we just have to worry about creating the blocks part.

al-x wrote:

GP1 wrote:

Come to think of it, should we just use JsScratch instead (with their permission, of course)? Why create something new when the same thing is further along then we are? Then we just have to worry about creating the blocks part.

well the problem is that their website is down co.cc got shut down and I know I download the source but I can't find it 

I know. Thats the only problem. They need to just archive their site and move it to another host. That is, if they didn't use co.cc hosting. I hope they didn't, otherwise they have to start all over again, and that may take some time.

al-x wrote:

GP1 wrote:

al-x wrote:

well the problem is that their website is down co.cc got shut down and I know I download the source but I can't find it 

I know. Thats the only problem. They need to just archive their site and move it to another host. That is, if they didn't use co.cc hosting. I hope they didn't, otherwise they have to start all over again, and that may take some time.

well their url was jsscratch.co.cc so they did use .co.cc    why don't we just use the jscratch player that we were making before with Pitusky and lolzballs?

They were forwarding their URL, I think. At the beginning, they had a different domain, then switched to .co.cc.

And yes, we will continue our work on jScratch, unless if JsScratch is back up. I don't want to rewrite something that works, but since it is not gone, as far as we know, we'll work on jScratch. So, do you have a GitHub account? (http://github.com/). We have a GitHub repository, and we need to know your username. I'll try to contact lolzballs after I have your GitHub username, so he can add permissions to you.

al-x wrote:

GP1 wrote:

al-x wrote:

well their url was jsscratch.co.cc so they did use .co.cc    why don't we just use the jscratch player that we were making before with Pitusky and lolzballs?

They were forwarding their URL, I think. At the beginning, they had a different domain, then switched to .co.cc.

And yes, we will continue our work on jScratch, unless if JsScratch is back up. I don't want to rewrite something that works, but since it is not gone, as far as we know, we'll work on jScratch. So, do you have a GitHub account? We have a GitHub repository, and we need to know your username. I'll try to contact lolzballs after I have your GitHub username, so he can add permissions to you.

I think I already have permission but my username is al-xi

Well, try cloning the repository (git clone https://github.com/jScratch/jScratch.git). You can only clone if you have a password, I think. I'll check with lolzballs, too.

al-x wrote:

GP1 wrote:

al-x wrote:

I think I already have permission but my username is al-xi

Well, try cloning the repository (git clone https://github.com/jScratch/jScratch.git). You can only clone if you have a password, I think. I'll check with lolzballs, too.

oh I don't know the password

Its your accounts password. He just has to give you permissions to clone. Try it again, but when it asks for a password, use your account's password.

GP1 wrote:

@al-x
Yes, you have permission to push to the repo. You can work on the blocks I haven't gotten to yet. These are the ones I don't know how to do. It is in viewer.js in the player folder.

I know how to make most of the blocks in html5 but not in js 

al-x wrote:

al-x wrote:

GP1 wrote:

@al-x
Yes, you have permission to push to the repo. You can work on the blocks I haven't gotten to yet. These are the ones I don't know how to do. It is in viewer.js in the player folder.

I know how to make most of the blocks in html5 but not in js 

well I got mixed up because it seems we're not using a canvas but more of a css outline so I started over    if I'm wrong say so

We are using JavaScript and canvas. CSS is only there to give the stage some style. However, the ask block will need to be done in HTML, because we need the input element to get text. We just style it to look like an ask block dialog. Maybe you can work on that.

al-x wrote:

also I was thinking about maybe basing the go everywhere reader on a existing one like sb2.js or JsScratch what do you think? 

You said that we could not get JsScratch, since .co.cc went down. However, sb2.js may work, but it is really complex code.

GP1 wrote:

pwiter wrote:

GP1 wrote:

Ah, yes. You are added to the GoEverywhere organization. Hey, if you want to see what I did to the JsScratch player, go here: http://goeverywhere.github.com/JsScratc … project.sb. I just added a fullscreen button, and it works! (the mouse glitches up, but that will be fixed later)

Nice! Just one thing though, will you need php? Because github pages doesn't support it.

I am aware of that. You can do that script you were doing with jScratch. If you can't, I have another solution, but I would rather you do it your way. My plan is to pull the Git repo every 2 minutes from GitHub to my server, where it will be hosted on the Macrobit site live, with PHP, MySQL, Perl, Python, Node.js, etc.

In that case should I set up a server and .tk domain for goeverywhere? Also, what is the new Macrobit url?

Last edited by pwiter (2012-12-30 19:40:21)

Oh, can you do it with the Go Everywhere repo? The JsScratch one is just a fork, so it is just there's so we can modify it. The Go Everywhere repo is the real one.

pwiter wrote:

GP1 wrote:

Oh, can you do it with the Go Everywhere repo? The JsScratch one is just a fork, so it is just there's so we can modify it. The Go Everywhere repo is the real one.

Ok, sure! OAuth is just a bit confusing.

EDIT: Apparently, I'm not a member yet.

Of what, the GoEverywhere organization? I'll look again.
EDIT: whoops. I must have cancelled it on accident. You are add now.

Last edited by GP1 (2012-12-30 21:01:40)

pwiter wrote:

GP1 wrote:

pwiter wrote:

Ok, sure! OAuth is just a bit confusing.

EDIT: Apparently, I'm not a member yet.

Of what, the GoEverywhere organization? I'll look again.

Yep. Thank you.

OK, your in.

al-x wrote:

GP1 wrote:

pwiter wrote:

Yep. Thank you.

OK, your in.

I don't think we need a fullscreen button... I can update the graphics a bunch though and if you guys don't mind can we remove the gradient header? I find it annoying.. 

Sure. Do what ever you want, we can just roll back to it anytime. And we need a fullscreen button, because we are doing an HTML5 version of the current Scratch 2.0 viewer. And the current Scratch viewer has a full screen button.