workaround for xor:
if <<(in1) or (in2)> and <not <(in1) = (in2)>>> return <true> else return <false> endfor nor, its as easy as
<not <(in1) or (in2)>>
Last edited by SJRCS_011 (2012-12-15 22:17:17)
Offline
SJRCS_011 wrote:
for nor, its as easy as
If my Family and Consumer Science teacher was saying that, I'd have to say 1... 2... 3...
Ugh. That class is so annoying. STOP MAKING ME SEW!
Anyways, SJRCS is right.
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
SJRCS_011 wrote:
for nor, its as easy as
If my Family and Consumer Science teacher was saying that, I'd have to say 1... 2... 3...
Ugh. That class is so annoying. STOP MAKING ME SEW!
Anyways, SJRCS is right.
In my tech class the kids scream like babys and are not smart. Somtimes i wonder why im in that class.
Offline
Sounds cool! I'd like something that could go like:
if chat=true open messageblock open chattable if chat=false close messageblock close chattable when [sprite1] clicked set chat to true when key [spacebar] pressed set chat to falseSorry if it didn't work.
Offline
eveadelekitty wrote:
Sounds cool! I'd like something that could go like:
if chat=true open messageblock open chattable if chat=false close messageblock close chattable when [sprite1] clicked set chat to true when key [spacebar] pressed set chat to falseSorry if it didn't work.
So you use that combination to make a chat box open on the scratch project. It's kind of like the ask thing but you open the chat thing and can talk on a scratch project and make a scratch collab easier by working on one project, and you know it can let you talk to others on the same project! Then you can make the same version to see your idea to edit the project.
That is irrelevant to the topic. Create your own instead.
Offline
eveadelekitty wrote:
Sounds cool! I'd like something that could go like:
if chat=true open messageblock open chattable if chat=false close messageblock close chattable when [sprite1] clicked set chat to true when key [spacebar] pressed set chat to falseSorry if it didn't work.
So you use that combination to make a chat box open on the scratch project. It's kind of like the ask thing but you open the chat thing and can talk on a scratch project and make a scratch collab easier by working on one project, and you know it can let you talk to others on the same project! Then you can make the same version to see your idea to edit the project.
You can script that.
This is rather irrelevant.
Offline
SJRCS_011 wrote:
workaround for xor:
if <<(in1) or (in2)> and <not <(in1) = (in2)>>> return <true> else return <false> endfor nor, its as easy as<not <(in1) or (in2)>>
xor:
<not <(in1) = (in2)>>
Offline
Firedrake969 wrote:
You can script that.
Well, to make it easier for newbies. Like, you don't want a guy like UGH HOW DO I MAKE THIS COLLAB EASIER TO MAKE...right?
Offline
eveadelekitty wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
You can script that.
Well, to make it easier for newbies. Like, you don't want a guy like UGH HOW DO I MAKE THIS COLLAB EASIER TO MAKE...right?
No.
Offline
eveadelekitty wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
You can script that.
Well, to make it easier for newbies. Like, you don't want a guy like UGH HOW DO I MAKE THIS COLLAB EASIER TO MAKE...right?
If a project is too hard to make, you should consider doing an easier one first. In life, you don't just get to skip to the hard stuff, you have to start with the easy stuff so you know how to do it.
Offline
fillergames wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
SJRCS_011 wrote:
for nor, its as easy as
If my Family and Consumer Science teacher was saying that, I'd have to say 1... 2... 3...
Ugh. That class is so annoying. STOP MAKING ME SEW!
Anyways, SJRCS is right.In my tech class the kids scream like babys and are not smart. Somtimes i wonder why im in that class.
i'm glad i'm not in tech
everyone would be coming up to me saying "WAT DO I DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" and i'd have to help them and i'd never get any work done
Offline
Maybe. But with clever scripting you can do it yourself.
Actually, the scripting isn't even that clever.
Offline