Pages: 1
Top Scratchers of The Month list!
I think that would be so better way to promote good scratchers.
It can be based on time active + sum number of love it's on all projects + projects and profile views and everything
IF YOU THINK THIS IS GOOD IDEA, BUMP
Offline
hmm......no opinion.
I'll think about this.
Offline
HiddenPerson wrote:
hmm......no opinion.
I'll think about this.
Offline
ok that is good idea
Offline
Well, popular Scratchers are already popular. No need to keep promoting them. I do not support.
Offline
i need more info
Offline
fruitmanninja wrote:
Well, popular Scratchers are already popular. No need to keep promoting them. I do not support.
Offline
fruitmanninja wrote:
Well, popular Scratchers are already popular. No need to keep promoting them. I do not support.
Offline
I don't know if I support
Offline
Good idea! However, I don't think it should be based on how popular they are, I think it should be determind by a competition, where you cannot vote for famous scratchers, and the winners get there.
Offline
fruitmanninja wrote:
Well, popular Scratchers are already popular. No need to keep promoting them. I do not support.
Also , there curators already
Oh , and there are gonna be new sections in 2.0.
Offline
Scratch is an educational website, intended to allow one to express his creativity. Creative and innovative projects are, ideally, the ones that get attention - that's what the front page is for, why we have curators and a section for featured projects.
The fact that Scratchers such as scratchU8 and JJROCKER (nothing against them) constantly get front page, and the attention of the whole website is already against the vein of the Scratch website, and in my opinion, should be erradicated. Recent updates to the front page system have done this quite well, actually. So,
fruitmanninja wrote:
popular Scratchers are already popular. No need to keep promoting them. I do not support.
Last edited by technoguyx (2012-12-10 10:38:36)
Offline
No, Scratch isn't about fame.
Offline
fruitmanninja wrote:
Well, popular Scratchers are already popular. No need to keep promoting them. I do not support.
I do not support. Reason is ^ there.
Offline
Well, popular Scratchers are already popular. No need to keep promoting them. I do not support.
Offline
ArabianPony wrote:
Well, popular Scratchers are already popular. No need to keep promoting them. I do not support.
You didn't say that. fruitmanninja did. We have enough quotes of that already, don't we?
Offline
MEOWCAT34 wrote:
Good idea! However, I don't think it should be based on how popular they are, I think it should be determind by a competition, where you cannot vote for famous scratchers, and the winners get there.
but how exactly would you determine "famous" scratchers?
Offline
Mokat wrote:
MEOWCAT34 wrote:
Good idea! However, I don't think it should be based on how popular they are, I think it should be determind by a competition, where you cannot vote for famous scratchers, and the winners get there.
but how exactly would you determine "famous" scratchers?
I don't know.
Offline
MEOWCAT34 wrote:
Mokat wrote:
MEOWCAT34 wrote:
Good idea! However, I don't think it should be based on how popular they are, I think it should be determind by a competition, where you cannot vote for famous scratchers, and the winners get there.
but how exactly would you determine "famous" scratchers?
I don't know.
Well, certain people have many friends that would vote for them.
Still no support.
Offline
Pages: 1