Scratch

dvd4 · 2012-11-22 15:18:30

Why are there no comments in scratch 2.0 ????

jvvg · 2012-11-22 15:19:19

What do you mean by that? Can you please give us a URL?

dvd4 · 2012-11-22 15:23:21

jvvg wrote:
What do you mean by that? Can you please give us a URL?

jvvg · 2012-11-22 15:24:34

dvd4 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
What do you mean by that? Can you please give us a URL?
http://i49.tinypic.com/iwrvv8.png

What?? You're talking about what?

ImagineIt · 2012-11-22 15:28:17

Because that's not important until it's released?

dvd4 · 2012-11-22 15:31:45

jvvg wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
What do you mean by that? Can you please give us a URL?
What?? You're talking about what?

Comments. In scratch.

stevetheipad · 2012-11-22 15:33:49

They just haven't implemented it yet....it's comin'. wink

Are you a 2.0 tester?

dvd4 · 2012-11-22 15:35:11

stevetheipad wrote:
They just haven't implemented it yet....it's comin'.

Are you a 2.0 tester?

No.

stevetheipad · 2012-11-22 15:41:53

dvd4 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
They just haven't implemented it yet....it's comin'.

Are you a 2.0 tester?
No.

Then don't use the editor. hmm

Also, don't ask for help with it when you're not even supposed to be using it. hmm

dvd4 · 2012-11-22 15:47:25

stevetheipad wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
They just haven't implemented it yet....it's comin'.

Are you a 2.0 tester?
No.
Then don't use the editor.

Also, don't ask for help with it when you're not even supposed to be using it.

Why not ?

I'm just curious.

777w · 2012-11-22 15:48:17

stevetheipad wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
They just haven't implemented it yet....it's comin'.

Are you a 2.0 tester?
No.
Then don't use the editor.

why does the scratch team leave it accessible when they dont want people to use it?
thats pretty silly if you ask me

stevetheipad · 2012-11-22 15:50:30

777w wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
dvd4 wrote:

No.
Then don't use the editor.
why does the scratch team leave it accessible when they dont want people to use it?
thats pretty silly if you ask me

They don't want to waste time blocking it for non testers when they have such a small team. "That'll just push back 2.0 further." (-Lightnin)

dvd4 · 2012-11-22 15:50:53

777w wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
dvd4 wrote:

No.
Then don't use the editor.
why does the scratch team leave it accessible when they dont want people to use it?
thats pretty silly if you ask me

…

I think it's good.

ImagineIt · 2012-11-22 16:09:40

777w wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
No.
Then don't use the editor.
why does the scratch team leave it accessible when they dont want people to use it?
thats pretty silly if you ask me

It is. It's too bad for them if they're telling people don't do it. They can't do a thing about it.

Wes64 · 2012-11-22 17:36:54

dvd4 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
dvd4 wrote:

No.
Then don't use the editor.

Also, don't ask for help with it when you're not even supposed to be using it.
Why not ?

I'm just curious.

you have to understand it's not finished and nothing you see is set in stone.

dvd4 · 2012-11-22 20:31:41

Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:

Then don't use the editor.

Also, don't ask for help with it when you're not even supposed to be using it.
Why not ?

I'm just curious.
you have to understand it's not finished and nothing you see is set in stone.

I know. I just want to know.

777w · 2012-11-22 20:43:35

stevetheipad wrote:
777w wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:

Then don't use the editor.
why does the scratch team leave it accessible when they dont want people to use it?
thats pretty silly if you ask me
They don't want to waste time blocking it for non testers when they have such a small team. "That'll just push back 2.0 further." (-Lightnin)

well then they cant really do much about people using it unauthorized

jji7skyline · 2012-11-22 23:23:48

Actually, the ST are fine with the few forumers who know about the 'hack' using it, so they can give feedback and report bugs, as long as it doesn't become public knowledge, it's all fine.

zubblewu · 2012-11-22 23:34:20

^ this. They're fine with a few people who actually check the ats using it, but they would most likely remove a project if it showed the "hack".

stevetheipad · 2012-11-23 00:09:13

But it's becoming public knowledge.

veggieman001 · 2012-11-23 00:10:49

It was always public knowledge. It's on a forum thread in the open, and people go there all the time.

jji7skyline · 2012-11-23 00:22:06

Yes, but public knowledge, as in, schools start using it and stuff, then complain to the ST about bugs, not realising it's just a beta. See what I mean? tongue

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2012-11-22 15:18:30

Why ????

#2 2012-11-22 15:19:19

Re: Why ????

#3 2012-11-22 15:23:21

Re: Why ????

jvvg wrote:

#4 2012-11-22 15:24:34

Re: Why ????

dvd4 wrote:

jvvg wrote:

#5 2012-11-22 15:28:17

Re: Why ????

#6 2012-11-22 15:31:45

Re: Why ????

jvvg wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

jvvg wrote:

#7 2012-11-22 15:33:49

Re: Why ????

#8 2012-11-22 15:35:11

Re: Why ????

stevetheipad wrote:

#9 2012-11-22 15:41:53

Re: Why ????

dvd4 wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

#10 2012-11-22 15:47:25

Re: Why ????

stevetheipad wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

#11 2012-11-22 15:48:17

Re: Why ????

stevetheipad wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

#12 2012-11-22 15:50:30

Re: Why ????

777w wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

#13 2012-11-22 15:50:53

Re: Why ????

777w wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

#14 2012-11-22 16:09:40

Re: Why ????

777w wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

#15 2012-11-22 17:36:54

Re: Why ????

dvd4 wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

#16 2012-11-22 20:31:41

Re: Why ????

Wes64 wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

#17 2012-11-22 20:43:35

Re: Why ????

stevetheipad wrote:

777w wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

#18 2012-11-22 23:23:48

Re: Why ????

#19 2012-11-22 23:34:20

Re: Why ????

#20 2012-11-23 00:09:13

Re: Why ????

#21 2012-11-23 00:10:49

Re: Why ????

#22 2012-11-23 00:22:06

Re: Why ????

Board footer