Scratch

ftf841 wrote:

JoLLDS wrote:

ftf841 wrote:

um.... alice stinks

Alice does not stink, it is very good, sounding a bit like Scratch, Alice is cool, but I gave this idea to make a 3D without having to choose the other, and if you want to make your own, not to model Blender also.


_________________________________________________________________________________


http://i.imgur.com/ngqGY.gif

reasons why alice stinks:
1. you have to use the selection of sprites they have because there is no 3D paint editor on alice
2.UI is hard for begginers  to understand
3.some blocks do not work at all

also i have installed alice before and if you want to see some more problems with alice look here: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=98960

1°: You're wrong, correct answer: The creation Sprite are there, just use another program such as Blender and put it in the folder or share on the site.

2°: You're right, but for half a beginners it's easy as Scratch.

3°: True


_________________________________________________________________________________

JoLLDS wrote:

777w wrote:

JoLLDS wrote:

Scratch 2.0 will work in Flash Player, you're half right, because the Scratch 2.0 in the offline version will work in Squeak

lol fake sig
id like to see your source, ive heard nothing of the 2.0 offline program being in squeak. in fact, i havent seen anything about the offline editor except that it will exist

This notice show in video of Scratch wik.

i have a feeling english isnt your native language
please show me this "video of Scratch wik"

777w wrote:

JoLLDS wrote:

777w wrote:

lol fake sig
id like to see your source, ive heard nothing of the 2.0 offline program being in squeak. in fact, i havent seen anything about the offline editor except that it will exist

This notice show in video of Scratch wik.

i have a feeling english isnt your native language
please show me this "video of Scratch wik"

no,no, no is video, I'm confused, the true is suggestion: http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Scratch2FAQ

JoLLDS wrote:

777w wrote:

JoLLDS wrote:

This notice show in video of Scratch wik.

i have a feeling english isnt your native language
please show me this "video of Scratch wik"

no,no, no is video, I'm confused, the true is suggestion: http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Scratch2FAQ

no is video? Is english your native language?

ftf841 wrote:

jontmy00 wrote:

SciTecCf wrote:

Totally. Plus, Scratch runs in Squeak, which, to my knowledge, does not support 3D. AND 3D models usually have 500+ faces, meaning that you would need 500+ costumes, and 2000+ positions, and textures, reflections, physics, particle effects, collision detection, a rendering engine, 3D sensing, a new camera morph... In fact, you would have to redesign Scratch entirely, and in another programming language... *shudder* Sorry, this just isn't gonna work.

Exactly, if you want 3D, use Alice.

um.... alice stinks

Alice 3 stinks
alice 2 is awesome

when gf clicked
repeat until <(timer) > [10]>
  go to [mouse-pointer v]
end
think [Scripts in your posts!] for (3) secs

Stop necroposting and block-spamming. Test those blocks out here instead.

JoLLDS wrote:

777w wrote:

SciTecCf wrote:

Totally. Plus, Scratch runs in Squeak, which, to my knowledge, does not support 3D. AND 3D models usually have 500+ faces, meaning that you would need 500+ costumes, and 2000+ positions, and textures, reflections, physics, particle effects, collision detection, a rendering engine, 3D sensing, a new camera morph... In fact, you would have to redesign Scratch entirely, and in another programming language... *shudder* Sorry, this just isn't gonna work.

except 2.0 will be in flash not squeak
i dont know how well that deals with 3d though

Scratch 2.0 will work in Flash Player, you're half right, because the Scratch 2.0 in the offline version will work in Squeak

The offline one won't be in squeak.