Scratch

zubblewu wrote:

But not more than we can handle. We can handle billions of antiparticles, I think we can handle a but of antihydrogen. And being a lot is why it would be such an amazing energy source, it just needs more research and development.

I guess

But wouldn't that cost money?
That we would have to borrow?

zubblewu wrote:

Once we get the economy back on track that won't be much trouble, eh? 

You just contradicted yourself 

Earlier you said Obama was so amazing and the economy was dandy 

zubblewu wrote:

Claude_Monet wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

Once we get the economy back on track that won't be much trouble, eh? 

You just contradicted yourself 

Earlier you said Obama was so amazing and the economy was dandy 

I didn't say it's dandy at all. Just that it's better than when he started  . Quotes? And yeah, just when we finally get out of this deficit and fix the economy.

Oh.

Well obviously    I don't think it'd be wise to start a multi-billion dollar program with 16 trillion dollars of debt.

zubblewu wrote:

Claude_Monet wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

I didn't say it's dandy at all. Just that it's better than when he started  . Quotes? And yeah, just when we finally get out of this deficit and fix the economy.

Oh.

Well obviously    I don't think it'd be wise to start a multi-billion dollar program with 16 trillion dollars of debt.

Yeah, probably not  . Hopefully it won't be to long before that number becomes negative (more surplus)  .

Yeah, a 16 trillion surplus would be pretty amazing.

zubblewu wrote:

Claude_Monet wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

Yeah, probably not  . Hopefully it won't be to long before that number becomes negative (more surplus)  .

Yeah, a 16 trillion surplus would be pretty amazing.

Yep. If it got that high, hopefully it'd keep an upward trend. Imagine it getting that high during the next presidency. And continuing at a steady rate. 

Well you know, Romney could make it happen 

zubblewu wrote:

Claude_Monet wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

Yep. If it got that high, hopefully it'd keep an upward trend. Imagine it getting that high during the next presidency. And continuing at a steady rate. 

Well you know, Romney could make it happen 

Or Jill Stein magically wins (some last minute huge dramatic thing happens) and we all live happily ever after 

You know, when I first heard of Jill, I thought 'I wonder what her plans are'

But when I first heard of Hillary Clinton, I thought 'Gee, a woman is running, how dandy'
Kinda cool how more sexually equal we are in the past 4 years.

zubblewu wrote:

Claude_Monet wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

Or Jill Stein magically wins (some last minute huge dramatic thing happens) and we all live happily ever after 

You know, when I first heard of Jill, I thought 'I wonder what her plans are'

But when I first heard of Hillary Clinton, I thought 'Gee, a woman is running, how dandy'
Kinda cool how more sexually equal we are in the past 4 years.

Actually, I thought the same. Our society is starting to come along.

If only she'd made it onto the ballot...

jvvg wrote:

I just saw a school political debate.

Despite the fact that my school is heavily Republican, the Democrats won in a blowout.

We're gonna do a mock election at my school. We even have to fill out voter IDs and everything.

luiysia wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

Claude_Monet wrote:

Oh.

Well obviously    I don't think it'd be wise to start a multi-billion dollar program with 16 trillion dollars of debt.

Yeah, probably not  . Hopefully it won't be to long before that number becomes negative (more surplus)  .

somehow there is a    in every single one of these posts. And you quoted despite being directly underneath each other.

There are other ways to express humor...

I was doing it intentionally 

dvd4 wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

luiysia wrote:

somehow there is a    in every single one of these posts. And you quoted despite being directly underneath each other. 

There are other ways to express humor… 

I was doing it intentionally 

But luiysia has a point 

But I understand the point anyway  . And humor is best expressed in the form of a    on the forums 

Mokat wrote:

"No offense" doesn't excuse you nor does it make it any less of an insult

+9001

jvvg wrote:

CN12 wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

But it doesn't outweigh what he has done.

Which is?...

Let's see...
-Ending one of the wars (Iraq)
-Saving the auto industry
-Preventing the economy from totally collapsing
-Killing Osama Bin Laden and several other leaders of Al Quaeda
-Expanding healthcare to a lot more Americans
-Reduce unemployment
...and a lot more but I'm too lazy to list the rest of it

Once again, jvvg, I didn't ask you. If I want you to respond I will specifically say jvvg. And obviously you are so desperate for Obama to win that you have to respond for Soupoftomato.
-Ending one of the wars (Iraq)-Okay
-Saving the auto industry-Yes, but no. He forced them into bankruptcy instead of letting them go through a traditional bankruptcy.
-Preventing the economy from totally collapsing-It is collapsed right now.
-Killing Osama Bin Laden and several other leaders of Al Quaeda-He didn't actually kill OBL. The Seal team did. He just told them to kill him.
-Expanding healthcare to a lot more Americans-I'm not very familiar with that.
-Reduce unemployment-He said in 2008 that at the end of his first term unemployment would be 5.5% or under. It's 7.9% right now.
...and a lot more but I'm too lazy to list the rest of it

MoreGamesNow wrote:

backspace_ wrote:

jvvg wrote:

Let's see...
-Ending one of the wars (Iraq) woohoo
-Saving the auto industry link pleaseare you denying that the auto-industry bailout happened, or that it was effective? effectiveness
-Preventing the economy from totally collapsing the economy is totally collapsing, thank you ObamaThe economy has been recovering for a while now.  The question isn't whether the economy is recovering, but to what extent Obama's policies helped false. we are plummeting furthere into a deficit, and debt has far from stagnated
-Killing Osama Bin Laden and several other leaders of Al Quaeda Obama didn't really do anything. Agents found the location of Osama Bin Laden and all Obama had to do was say "yeah sure kill him." kind of a no-brainer, George Bush would have done it, Jimmy Carter would have done it, any president would have done it.Romney is quoted as saying "It's not worth moving heaven and Earth and spending billions of dollars just to catch one person".  Whether you believe the effort we put into catching Osama bin Laden was worth it, you cannot claim that anyone would have done it. So then Obama put forth an extreme amount of money to catch someone posing no apparent threat, and so this should not be on a list of positives
-Expanding healthcare to a lot more Americans there are a lot of negative effects coming with thatOf course; there were also plenty of positive effects too.  The overall effect is still debated. so if the overall effect is not that good, this should be taken off a list of positives
-Reduce unemployment link ??? (if one exists)here are the statistics for unemployment.  The unemployment now is equal to what it was when he assumed office.  Democrats argue that this shows a successful recovery from the recession of Bush (most people agree that Obama's policies had little chance to take effect the first year). i see that at Bush's era unemployment stayed around 5.0 but upon 2008 it increased steadily, then went down a little to 7.8, a 50% increase from 4 years ago (50%!)
...and a lot more but I'm too lazy to list the rest of it I'll bet