Scratch

Magnie · 2012-10-16 00:30:05

ohaiderstudios wrote:
Magnie wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:

First you want to use classes, now operators?????

What's next, functions?

I was hoping for something like:
Code:
Dungeon().add_item('Magic Sword', 'some statement that could be "exec"-ed')
Sure. That works I guess.
...

That still doesn't solve many of my problems

So let's say that this item restores 10 hp...
Code:
Dungeon().add_item('Potion', 'self.hp += 10')
Sound good?

EDIT: how about an additional 'type' argument that specifies consumable/weapon/armor/misc?
This would make classification easier.
A weapon's code would look like:
Code:
Dungeon().add_item('Magic Sword', 10, 'weapon')
with 10 being the attack bonus

I'm being more and more convinced that decorators will help with this... tongue

Dungeon.add_item(name, type, modifier)

or

Dungeon.add_item(name, type, modifiers={'base': 10, 'magic': 5})

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-16 18:13:11

Magnie wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:
Magnie wrote:

Sure. That works I guess.
...

That still doesn't solve many of my problems

So let's say that this item restores 10 hp...
Code:
Dungeon().add_item('Potion', 'self.hp += 10')
Sound good?

EDIT: how about an additional 'type' argument that specifies consumable/weapon/armor/misc?
This would make classification easier.
A weapon's code would look like:
Code:
Dungeon().add_item('Magic Sword', 10, 'weapon')
with 10 being the attack bonus
I'm being more and more convinced that decorators will help with this...

Dungeon.add_item(name, type, modifier)

or

Dungeon.add_item(name, type, modifiers={'base': 10, 'magic': 5})

I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND DECORATORS!!!!!

DON'T JUDGE MEEEEE!!!!!

Magnie · 2012-10-16 21:07:52

ohaiderstudios wrote:
Magnie wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:

...

That still doesn't solve many of my problems

So let's say that this item restores 10 hp...
Code:
Dungeon().add_item('Potion', 'self.hp += 10')
Sound good?

EDIT: how about an additional 'type' argument that specifies consumable/weapon/armor/misc?
This would make classification easier.
A weapon's code would look like:
Code:
Dungeon().add_item('Magic Sword', 10, 'weapon')
with 10 being the attack bonus
I'm being more and more convinced that decorators will help with this...

Dungeon.add_item(name, type, modifier)

or

Dungeon.add_item(name, type, modifiers={'base': 10, 'magic': 5})
I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND DECORATORS!!!!!

DON'T JUDGE MEEEEE!!!!!

I don't either, all I know is that it wraps around the function you write. smile

playzooki · 2012-10-17 14:17:02

Magnie wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:
Magnie wrote:

I'm being more and more convinced that decorators will help with this...

Dungeon.add_item(name, type, modifier)

or

Dungeon.add_item(name, type, modifiers={'base': 10, 'magic': 5})
I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND DECORATORS!!!!!

DON'T JUDGE MEEEEE!!!!!
I don't either, all I know is that it wraps around the function you write.

What about LSTC? Could you host the 2.0 server?

Magnie · 2012-10-17 16:45:13

playzooki wrote:
Magnie wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:

I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND DECORATORS!!!!!

DON'T JUDGE MEEEEE!!!!!
I don't either, all I know is that it wraps around the function you write.
What about LSTC? Could you host the 2.0 server?

2.0 is up.

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-17 17:19:59

Much progress has been made.

I've done most of the networking protocol, thanks to code from Magnie's other networking projects tongue

Don't worry, credit will be given.

playzooki · 2012-10-19 15:27:11

Magnie wrote:
playzooki wrote:
Magnie wrote:

I don't either, all I know is that it wraps around the function you write.
What about LSTC? Could you host the 2.0 server?
2.0 is up.

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!!

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-19 18:27:15

Anyone want to go on? (Chat.PY 2.0 remember)

Molybdenum · 2012-10-19 18:31:20

When is 3.0 going to work? I really want MolyBot back, and I don't want to change it for 2.0 (since 2.0 has broadcasts instead of vars for sending messages).

zippynk · 2012-10-19 19:33:37

ohaiderstudios wrote:
Anyone want to go on? (Chat.PY 2.0 remember)

Ok

Magnie · 2012-10-19 21:13:38

Molybdenum wrote:
When is 3.0 going to work?

Until I have a break from school. I'm probably going to end up recoding it again and possibly recode chat3 to use indexing or caching rather than searching through every single user to see if they are in the channel or not.

blob8108: How's the parser coming along? The RSC protocol uses double double-quotes ("") for a single double-quote. (Thanks MathWizz for the info!) smile

laser314 · 2012-10-19 23:21:12

Bit art is still down.

Magnie · 2012-10-20 12:45:00

laser314 wrote:
Bit art is still down.

It's going to be down for a while since I've been having a lot of bugs occurring.

blob8108 · 2012-10-20 13:23:53

Magnie wrote:
blob8108: How's the parser coming along? The RSC protocol uses double double-quotes ("") for a single double-quote. (Thanks MathWizz for the info!)

Here, updated. Should work now! smile

(Apologies for the crazy algorithm and the nested loops/generators tongue There must be a simpler way...)

Last edited by blob8108 (2012-10-20 13:24:56)

Magnie · 2012-10-20 22:50:52

blob8108 wrote:
Magnie wrote:
blob8108: How's the parser coming along? The RSC protocol uses double double-quotes ("") for a single double-quote. (Thanks MathWizz for the info!)
Here, updated. Should work now!

(Apologies for the crazy algorithm and the nested loops/generators There must be a simpler way...)

Sweet, thank you. smile

playzooki · 2012-10-27 15:12:05

Magnie wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
When is 3.0 going to work?
Until I have a break from school. I'm probably going to end up recoding it again and possibly recode chat3 to use indexing or caching rather than searching through every single user to see if they are in the channel or not.

blob8108: How's the parser coming along? The RSC protocol uses double double-quotes ("") for a single double-quote. (Thanks MathWizz for the info!)

When you have done that, shouldn't it be called 3.1 chat.py?

Magnie · 2012-10-27 15:20:53

playzooki wrote:
Magnie wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
When is 3.0 going to work?
Until I have a break from school. I'm probably going to end up recoding it again and possibly recode chat3 to use indexing or caching rather than searching through every single user to see if they are in the channel or not.

blob8108: How's the parser coming along? The RSC protocol uses double double-quotes ("") for a single double-quote. (Thanks MathWizz for the info!)
When you have done that, shouldn't it be called 3.1 chat.py?

LSTC will change, but the project will probably be the same. So, the server version will change, but it will still be called Chat.PY 3.0 (or 3).

Molybdenum · 2012-10-27 15:30:10

Why isn't anyone ever on 2.0?

blob8108 · 2012-10-27 16:41:50

Magnie wrote:
I'm probably going to end up recoding it again and possibly recode chat3 to use indexing or caching rather than searching through every single user to see if they are in the channel or not.

Just as a random observation that might have escaped you: I found out recently that hash-table lookups are really fast in Python — so searching dicts and sets is very efficient. smile Maybe have a set for each channel, and then just test it using the "in" operator?

Last edited by blob8108 (2012-10-27 16:42:06)

Magnie · 2012-10-27 19:26:03

Molybdenum: Probably because no one really knows we downgraded.

blob8108 wrote:
Magnie wrote:
I'm probably going to end up recoding it again and possibly recode chat3 to use indexing or caching rather than searching through every single user to see if they are in the channel or not.
Just as a random observation that might have escaped you: I found out recently that hash-table lookups are really fast in Python — so searching dicts and sets is very efficient. Maybe have a set for each channel, and then just test it using the "in" operator?

My current structure for channels is like this:

Code:

self.channel_data = {'scratch' : {'ranked' : {'Magnie' : '*'},
                                  'whitelist' : ['Magnie'],
                                  'blacklist' : [],
                                  'mutelist': [],
                                  'flags' : 'b',
                                  'motd' : 'Welcome!'}}

Or basically: dicts, strings, and arrays (is there a difference between lists/arrays and sets?). tongue

bobbybee · 2012-10-27 19:54:08

I know tongue Wait.. you just told me (trolololololol)

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-28 00:34:51

Magnie wrote:

Code:

self.channel_data = {'scratch' : {'ranked' : {'Magnie' : '*'},
                                  'whitelist' : ['Magnie'],
                                  'blacklist' : [],
                                  'mutelist': [],
                                  'flags' : 'b',
                                  'motd' : 'Welcome!'}}

Yo dawg, we heard you like dictionaries...

I've been too busy to go on Chat.PY 2 right now

Molybdenum · 2012-10-28 09:32:16

Magnie wrote:
Molybdenum: Probably because no one really knows we downgraded.
ically: dicts, strings, and arrays (is there a difference between lists/arrays and sets?).

sad

blob8108 · 2012-11-05 16:33:38

is there a difference between lists/arrays and sets?

Yes — sets are unordered lists which can only contain unique values. They're optimised so that testing a set to see if it contains a value (using the "in" operator) is much faster. You can test this thus:

Code:

In [15]: import time

In [16]: def timeit(x):  
    start = time.time()
    x()
    end = time.time()
    return end - start
   ....: 

In [17]: big_list = range(2560000)

In [18]: big_set = set(big_list)

In [19]: timeit(lambda: 'x' in big_list)
Out[19]: 0.20299482345581055

In [20]: timeit(lambda: 'x' in big_set)
Out[20]: 3.0994415283203125e-06

You can also do set operations, too, like union and intersection. They're pretty cool. smile

Last edited by blob8108 (2012-11-05 16:34:23)

NeilWest · 2012-11-06 02:29:30

Molybdenum wrote:
Why isn't anyone ever on 2.0?

I am. Derp.

Scratch

archived forums

#226 2012-10-16 00:30:05

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Magnie wrote:

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Code:

Code:

Code:

#227 2012-10-16 18:13:11

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Magnie wrote:

Code:

Code:

#228 2012-10-16 21:07:52

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Magnie wrote:

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Code:

Code:

#229 2012-10-17 14:17:02

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Magnie wrote:

#230 2012-10-17 16:45:13

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

playzooki wrote:

Magnie wrote:

ohaiderstudios wrote:

#231 2012-10-17 17:19:59

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#232 2012-10-19 15:27:11

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

playzooki wrote:

Magnie wrote:

#233 2012-10-19 18:27:15

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#234 2012-10-19 18:31:20

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#235 2012-10-19 19:33:37

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

ohaiderstudios wrote:

#236 2012-10-19 21:13:38

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Molybdenum wrote:

#237 2012-10-19 23:21:12

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#238 2012-10-20 12:45:00

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

laser314 wrote:

#239 2012-10-20 13:23:53

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

#240 2012-10-20 22:50:52

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

blob8108 wrote:

Magnie wrote:

#241 2012-10-27 15:12:05

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

Molybdenum wrote:

#242 2012-10-27 15:20:53

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

playzooki wrote:

Magnie wrote:

Molybdenum wrote:

#243 2012-10-27 15:30:10

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#244 2012-10-27 16:41:50

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

#245 2012-10-27 19:26:03

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

blob8108 wrote: