Check it out guys- when you drag one script from one sprite to another sprite- obviously it will add it to that sprite. It also adds it to the bottom of that's sprites scripts.
So you would expect it to be perfectly aligned-
BUT
when you click clean up- it moves slightly!!!!!!!!
This is a very tiny and unnoticeable error but they might wanna fix it...
Offline
dave1998 wrote:
This is a very tiny and unnoticeable error
then why is it necessary to fix?
im sure in the transfer to flash-based 2.0 this "glitch" has been lost
Offline
thats not an error, thats just how it works
similarly, if you click clean up while a script is running itll be different from when you click clean up and its not
Offline
So yeah, there are bugs in 1.4. It's useless to report them because it'll never be fixed, since they're making 2.0, where these bugs are already gone.
Offline
Gravitation wrote:
So yeah, there are bugs in 1.4. It's useless to report them because it'll never be fixed, since they're making 2.0, where these bugs are already gone.
are you sure they will not add them to 2.0 ?
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
Gravitation wrote:
So yeah, there are bugs in 1.4. It's useless to report them because it'll never be fixed, since they're making 2.0, where these bugs are already gone.
are you sure they will not add them to 2.0 ?
why would they add a bug to 2.0
the goal is not to have any. if you have no bugs, then it is counter-intuitive to add bugs...
Offline
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Gravitation wrote:
So yeah, there are bugs in 1.4. It's useless to report them because it'll never be fixed, since they're making 2.0, where these bugs are already gone.
are you sure they will not add them to 2.0 ?
why would they add a bug to 2.0
the goal is not to have any. if you have no bugs, then it is counter-intuitive to add bugs...
why did they add a bug to 1.4 ?
don't ask me
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
are you sure they will not add them to 2.0 ?why would they add a bug to 2.0
the goal is not to have any. if you have no bugs, then it is counter-intuitive to add bugs...why did they add a bug to 1.4 ?
don't ask me
they didn't add a bug to 1.4. i have no idea why you think they did.
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
are you sure they will not add them to 2.0 ?why would they add a bug to 2.0
the goal is not to have any. if you have no bugs, then it is counter-intuitive to add bugs...why did they add a bug to 1.4 ?
don't ask me
-_- they didn't do it on purpose... Bugs appear out of mistakes in codes.
Offline
jontmy00 wrote:
I noticed it. It isn't that necessary to fix it now, though, since 2.0 is just about to be released like Wes said.
Actually that was me
Offline
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
why would they add a bug to 2.0
the goal is not to have any. if you have no bugs, then it is counter-intuitive to add bugs...why did they add a bug to 1.4 ?
don't ask methey didn't add a bug to 1.4. i have no idea why you think they did.
they didn't ? yes they did,for example there is this bug with costume renaming that they made,and that's just one example
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
why did they add a bug to 1.4 ?
don't ask methey didn't add a bug to 1.4. i have no idea why you think they did.
they didn't ? yes they did,for example there is this bug with costume renaming that they made,and that's just one example
No, you don't add a bug. You accidentally code a bug.
Offline
kayybee wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
why would they add a bug to 2.0
the goal is not to have any. if you have no bugs, then it is counter-intuitive to add bugs...why did they add a bug to 1.4 ?
don't ask me-_- they didn't do it on purpose... Bugs appear out of mistakes in codes.
Offline
Gravitation wrote:
jontmy00 wrote:
I noticed it. It isn't that necessary to fix it now, though, since 2.0 is just about to be released like Wes said.
Actually that was me
Seems otherwise. I was referring to post #3.
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
they didn't add a bug to 1.4. i have no idea why you think they did.they didn't ? yes they did,for example there is this bug with costume renaming that they made,and that's just one example
No, you don't add a bug. You accidentally code a bug.
that's what I thought.
Now I know a lot more than I did before.
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
they didn't ? yes they did,for example there is this bug with costume renaming that they made,and that's just one example
No, you don't add a bug. You accidentally code a bug.
that's what I thought.
Now I know a lot more than I did before.
Now I Know not a lot more than I did before.
Offline