Scratch

OverPowered wrote:

I am going to go through your statement line by line and tell you why it's wrong.

cartooncreator wrote:

Yeah, and Biden is the one who is spouting lies!

Not flaming material at all...

This whole topic is flaming material.

OverPowered wrote:

we are TRILLIONS in debt

Republicans just don't like the debt because they know half of it is theirs,

Really? Source?

OverPowered wrote:

have more people on food stamps, etc!

Yes, there are more peple on food stamps, failing to starve. But Paul Ryan proposes we cut the food stamp program to save money. Hopefully those now-starving people appreciate their tax cut...

Something tells me there's more to that story then I'm hearing. However idk.

OverPowered wrote:

I really appreciate your signature, cartooncreator - "Romney FTW". A vote for Romney is a vote to let global warming destroy the planet, so indeed that would be FingTW.

No comment. Just loled at that one.

jvvg wrote:

OverPowered wrote:

we are TRILLIONS in debt

Republicans just don't like the debt because they know half of it is theirs,

Really? Source?

It's common knowledge about what Bush did. He started two wars and payed for it by cutting everybody's taxes.

I obviously know we are in dept.
I was replying to OverPowered's "Republicans just don't like the debt because they know half of it is theirs,"

jvvg wrote:

CheeseMunchy wrote:

jvvg wrote:

Really? Source?

It's common knowledge about what Bush did. He started two wars and payed for it by cutting everybody's taxes.

I obviously know we are in dept.
I was replying to OverPowered's "Republicans just don't like the debt because they know half of it is theirs,"

Well, I was too. I was explaining how a lot of it belonged to Republicans.

Well, that isn't very reverent to what I meant. Did you read the whole 14 words?

Hmm, jvvg. Maybe I should put a Mitt Romney banner in my signature. That would be funny; you write something and your sig says "Obama" and then I write something and my sig says "Romney". 

CheeseMunchy wrote:

jvvg wrote:

CheeseMunchy wrote:

Well, that isn't very reverent to what I meant. Did you read the whole 14 words?

"Republicans don't like the debt because they know half of it is theirs"  - I was pointing out why and that doesn't need a source.

Still not what I meant, but ok.

Sure seems like what you meant...
You were asking for a source for that and I gave information that doesn't need a source because everybody knows it.

jvvg wrote:

cartooncreator wrote:

jvvg wrote:

I think that it's funny when somebody actually thinks they can win a debate with stuff that they made up and have pretty much nothing to support. I would laugh too if my opponent were like Ryan was there for the reason I stated above.

Yeah, and Biden is the one who is spouting lies! The economy is much worse than when Bush was in office; we are TRILLIONS in debt, have more people on food stamps, etc! Obama said he would unite the United States; unite my eye!!! He has created class warfare, has split the country, and he is the one to blame for all of this!!! #Nobama

*Laughs like Biden at cartooncreator*
The economy has improved a lot. A lot more businesses are doing better, the unemployment is better, etc. The high debt is a result of Republicans refusing to cooperate with the President.
And, about "creating class warfare", Romney wants to give big tax breaks to the rich (making them even richer) while taxing the middle class more (making them have less money). Talk about separating classes.

Romney wants to give tax breaks to the rich so that they can help create jobs.

soupoftomato wrote:

CN12 wrote:

jvvg wrote:

*Laughs like Biden at cartooncreator*
The economy has improved a lot. A lot more businesses are doing better, the unemployment is better, etc. The high debt is a result of Republicans refusing to cooperate with the President.
And, about "creating class warfare", Romney wants to give big tax breaks to the rich (making them even richer) while taxing the middle class more (making them have less money). Talk about separating classes.

Romney wants to give tax breaks to the rich so that they can help create jobs.

From the satire I posted earlier:
I have already clearly explained to them that we will need to fire that bird in order to pay for the required tax cuts for job creators, by which I mean myself. If we do not fire large swaths of people, we will not be able to create jobs, and the number of people who will need jobs will be much greater after we have fired them all so it make sense to fire as many of them as possible in order to create those jobs.

The country fell into a recession when Obama was president, so why re-elect him?

Ah well. At least I have one person that stands with me. Thanks CN12!

All I can say is, I hope Romney wins! #HopeForChangeIn2012 

CN12 wrote:

jvvg wrote:

cartooncreator wrote:

Yeah, and Biden is the one who is spouting lies! The economy is much worse than when Bush was in office; we are TRILLIONS in debt, have more people on food stamps, etc! Obama said he would unite the United States; unite my eye!!! He has created class warfare, has split the country, and he is the one to blame for all of this!!! #Nobama

*Laughs like Biden at cartooncreator*
The economy has improved a lot. A lot more businesses are doing better, the unemployment is better, etc. The high debt is a result of Republicans refusing to cooperate with the President.
And, about "creating class warfare", Romney wants to give big tax breaks to the rich (making them even richer) while taxing the middle class more (making them have less money). Talk about separating classes.

Romney wants to give tax breaks to the rich so that they can help create jobs.

If the rich have tax breaks, all they're going to do is add more rooms to their mansions. That doesn't create any jobs. You're cutting benefits to people who need them so rich guys can get even richer.

Mokat wrote:

The country fell into a recession when Obama was president, so why re-elect him?

So, I'm guessing you were born in 2009. The recession started before you were born during Bush.

Mokat wrote:

cartooncreator wrote:

Ah well. At least I have one person that stands with me. Thanks CN12!

All I can say is, I hope Romney wins! #HopeForChangeIn2012 

+100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

-9999999999999999999999999999999999999999 (see my above posts)

jvvg wrote:

Mokat wrote:

cartooncreator wrote:

Ah well. At least I have one person that stands with me. Thanks CN12!

All I can say is, I hope Romney wins! #HopeForChangeIn2012 

+100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

-9999999999999999999999999999999999999999 (see my above posts)

Mokat wrote:

jvvg wrote:

So, I'm guessing you were born in 2009. The recession started before you were born during Bush.

-_-

So your response for me not believing a total lie is that? Nice way to win a debate.

jvvg wrote:

jvvg wrote:

Mokat wrote:

+100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

-9999999999999999999999999999999999999999 (see my above posts)

Mokat wrote:

jvvg wrote:

So, I'm guessing you were born in 2009. The recession started before you were born during Bush.

-_-

So your response for me not believing a total lie is that? Nice way to win a debate.

That's kinda rude...

soupoftomato wrote:

Mokat wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

From the satire I posted earlier:
I have already clearly explained to them that we will need to fire that bird in order to pay for the required tax cuts for job creators, by which I mean myself. If we do not fire large swaths of people, we will not be able to create jobs, and the number of people who will need jobs will be much greater after we have fired them all so it make sense to fire as many of them as possible in order to create those jobs.

The country fell into a recession when Obama was president, so why re-elect him?

BIG RED LETTERS SO PEOPLE WILL PAY ATTENTION TO ME 

The recession became labelled a recession in 2008, under Bush.
Here is the graph of unemployment over several years.

The unemployment rate starts an alarming climb in 2008, then continues for a bit in 2009. This is because, in 2009, Obama had inherited a worsening situation.
Now there has been a continuous decrease in the Unemployment rate under Obama.

The source is the actual U.S. Government's statistics.

One of the few cases where red letters in all caps is needed.