Scratch

Molybdenum · 2012-10-06 21:56:47

zippynk wrote:
I suggest reverting to an old version of the code until the bug is found.
(Ohaider agrees.)

Since you both agree, I agree as well. MolyBot does too smile However, playzooki also does sad

EDIT: Page 8!

Supporters:
ohaiderstudios
zippynk
Molybdenum
MolyBot
playzooki

Last edited by Molybdenum (2012-10-06 21:57:41)

Magnie · 2012-10-07 00:44:43

I'll revert next week on Tuesday.

playzooki · 2012-10-07 14:31:18

Molybdenum wrote:
zippynk wrote:
I suggest reverting to an old version of the code until the bug is found.
(Ohaider agrees.)
Since you both agree, I agree as well. MolyBot does too However, playzooki also does

EDIT: Page 8!

Supporters:
ohaiderstudios
zippynk
Molybdenum
MolyBot
playzooki

I agree, but thats not a bad thing, you just hate me. The current one is hit and miss.
AND SO DOES UJ! tongue

Molybdenum · 2012-10-07 19:19:03

Bump.

I found the problem!
When a user uses commands, the server gets stuck in an infinite loop!

(oh wait, did you already know that? I really thought I had a breakthough sad )

Last edited by Molybdenum (2012-10-07 19:24:37)

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-07 23:32:32

Molybdenum wrote:
Bump.

I found the problem!
When a user uses commands, the server gets stuck in an infinite loop!

(oh wait, did you already know that? I really thought I had a breakthough )

That was our working theory, yes. big_smile

But it encourages me to see the same people discovering similar things separately.

So basically...it was a victory in its own way. smile

Last edited by ohaiderstudios (2012-10-07 23:33:32)

Molybdenum · 2012-10-08 16:28:50

ohaiderstudios wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
Bump.

I found the problem!
When a user uses commands, the server gets stuck in an infinite loop!

(oh wait, did you already know that? I really thought I had a breakthough )
That was our working theory, yes.

But it encourages me to see the same people discovering similar things separately.

So basically...it was a victory in its own way.

Thanks big_smile I figured it out by trying commands (Sorry, I know I wasn't supposed to do that, but the servers all better now), realizig that I, and everyone else, couldn't chat, so the "server message bouncer" part of the server was disabled.

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-08 18:56:53

Magnie wrote:
I'll revert next week on Tuesday.

Thank you sooooo much Magnie! We all appreciate the trouble you go through so we can waste time chatting with people we've never met!

No but seriously, thanks! big_smile

Molybdenum · 2012-10-08 19:03:05

ohaiderstudios wrote:
Magnie wrote:
I'll revert next week on Tuesday.
Thank you sooooo much Magnie! We all appreciate the trouble you go through so we can waste time chatting with people we've never met!

No but seriously, thanks!

... Anyway, tuesday is tommorow!

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-08 19:33:28

Molybdenum wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:
Magnie wrote:
I'll revert next week on Tuesday.
Thank you sooooo much Magnie! We all appreciate the trouble you go through so we can waste time chatting with people we've never met!

No but seriously, thanks!
... Anyway, tuesday is tommorow!

Yes...yes it is. Don't let anyone tell you differently.

zippynk · 2012-10-08 22:38:53

Magnie wrote:
I'll revert next week on Tuesday.

As ohaider also said, Thank you!

Last edited by zippynk (2012-10-08 22:39:05)

Molybdenum · 2012-10-09 18:36:08

Its tuesday!

And its still broken. You there Magnie?

Details: Everything worked for a little while, then everything broke.

Magnie · 2012-10-10 01:54:05

Do you have any details other than that? hmm

I reverted back, though I think I've given up on trying to auto-disconnect users for now and replaced the (probable) broken loop with a part channel instead. I haven't tested it though.

playzooki · 2012-10-10 14:17:42

Magnie wrote:
Do you have any details other than that?

I reverted back, though I think I've given up on trying to auto-disconnect users for now and replaced the (probable) broken loop with a part channel instead. I haven't tested it though.

I will! EDIT (Yes! Another edit!): Not working.

Last edited by playzooki (2012-10-10 14:20:02)

Molybdenum · 2012-10-10 19:56:35

Magnie wrote:
Do you have any details other than that?

I reverted back, though I think I've given up on trying to auto-disconnect users for now and replaced the (probable) broken loop with a part channel instead. I haven't tested it though.

Chatted with some test posts, MolyBot worked, /list, and it worked (I was only one in scratch), /list-all, worked (I was only one online), tried to chat again, nothing worked. Rejoined, didn't work.

Magnie · 2012-10-11 13:12:04

I think I'm going to recode server.py with the greenlet module instead of full blown threads. Though I'll need to learn a little more about them before I do it.

playzooki · 2012-10-11 14:13:28

Magnie wrote:
I think I'm going to recode server.py with the greenlet module instead of full blown threads. Though I'll need to learn a little more about them before I do it.

Yay.

blob8108 · 2012-10-11 15:22:00

Magnie wrote:
I think I'm going to recode server.py with the greenlet module instead of full blown threads. Though I'll need to learn a little more about them before I do it.

Use Stackless Python! smile

Magnie · 2012-10-11 16:20:39

blob8108 wrote:
Magnie wrote:
I think I'm going to recode server.py with the greenlet module instead of full blown threads. Though I'll need to learn a little more about them before I do it.
Use Stackless Python!

I'm tempted to, but my host doesn't have it. hmm

blob8108 · 2012-10-11 16:31:01

Magnie wrote:
blob8108 wrote:
Magnie wrote:
I think I'm going to recode server.py with the greenlet module instead of full blown threads. Though I'll need to learn a little more about them before I do it.
Use Stackless Python!
I'm tempted to, but my host doesn't have it.

You can't install it? Meh. hmm

Oh, and have you tried Twisted yet? tongue

Magnie · 2012-10-11 16:32:36

blob8108 wrote:
Magnie wrote:
blob8108 wrote:

Use Stackless Python!
I'm tempted to, but my host doesn't have it.
You can't install it? Meh.

Oh, and have you tried Twisted yet?

No, sorry for being so stubborn. tongue

Molybdenum · 2012-10-11 17:16:24

Found a bug: When a user leaves, the "X has left room Y" is not broadcast. So when a user chats after a user leaves and the leave message is not displayed, his message is overode with the leave message.

blob8108 · 2012-10-12 13:17:15

Magnie wrote:
blob8108 wrote:
Oh, and have you tried Twisted yet?
No, sorry for being so stubborn.

Oh. How disappointing. tongue

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-13 14:17:29

Chat.PY doesn't seem so "reverted" to me...

Magnie · 2012-10-13 14:20:42

ohaiderstudios wrote:
Chat.PY doesn't seem so "reverted" to me...

No idea what's going on. But with greenlet's timeout features, client commands will be resilient hopefully.

ohaiderstudios · 2012-10-13 15:29:02

Magnie wrote:
ohaiderstudios wrote:
Chat.PY doesn't seem so "reverted" to me...
No idea what's going on. But with greenlet's timeout features, client commands will be resilient hopefully.

I thought the plan was to revert to 2.0?

If not, sorry for the accusation, but nothing's fixed.

Scratch

archived forums

#176 2012-10-06 21:56:47

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

zippynk wrote:

#177 2012-10-07 00:44:43

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#178 2012-10-07 14:31:18

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Molybdenum wrote:

zippynk wrote:

#179 2012-10-07 19:19:03

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#180 2012-10-07 23:32:32

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Molybdenum wrote:

#181 2012-10-08 16:28:50

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Molybdenum wrote:

#182 2012-10-08 18:56:53

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

#183 2012-10-08 19:03:05

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Magnie wrote:

#184 2012-10-08 19:33:28

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Molybdenum wrote:

ohaiderstudios wrote:

Magnie wrote:

#185 2012-10-08 22:38:53

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

#186 2012-10-09 18:36:08

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#187 2012-10-10 01:54:05

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#188 2012-10-10 14:17:42

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

#189 2012-10-10 19:56:35

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

#190 2012-10-11 13:12:04

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#191 2012-10-11 14:13:28

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

#192 2012-10-11 15:22:00

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

#193 2012-10-11 16:20:39

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

blob8108 wrote:

Magnie wrote:

#194 2012-10-11 16:31:01

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

blob8108 wrote:

Magnie wrote:

#195 2012-10-11 16:32:36

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

blob8108 wrote:

Magnie wrote:

blob8108 wrote:

#196 2012-10-11 17:16:24

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#197 2012-10-12 13:17:15

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

Magnie wrote:

blob8108 wrote:

#198 2012-10-13 14:17:29

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

#199 2012-10-13 14:20:42

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)

ohaiderstudios wrote:

#200 2012-10-13 15:29:02

Re: Little Server That Can (Chat.PY, Bit Art, etc.)