Harry Potter is better than Twilight, and here's why:
1. Edward is abusive
2. Harry Potter appeals to a larger fan base, and only teenage girls like Twilight
3. Twilight fans are more annoying then Harry Potter fans
Offline
technoguyx wrote:
Harry Potter > Twilight. Without even reading either of the books (but having watched both movies - Well, movie and series of movies) I think Harry Potter is better, because it's a CLASSIC.
keikij wrote:
No More Twilight! No More Twilight! No More Twilight!
Just wait 'till a Twilight crazy fangirl comes here... It'll give us a good laugh XD
Sometimes, you can't really learn much about a book by watching the movie. The two may differ so much you won't be able to recognize that they are the same. The Count of Monte Cristo, an excellent book, had a not-so-good movie.
Last edited by Zelda123 (2009-06-12 16:41:58)
Offline
*Grabs a copy of Twilight and uses it to keep may campfire going*
oh yeah, I almost forgot:
*Starts skipping around* I'm a sparkly vampire! I'm a sparkly vampire!
Last edited by keikij (2009-06-12 17:02:29)
Offline
keikij wrote:
*Grabs a copy of Twilight and uses it to keep may campfire going*
oh yeah, I almost forgot:
*Starts skipping around* I'm a sparkly vampire! I'm a sparkly vampire!
Hey, keep it nice. If they like it, its fine. It's an opinion.
Offline
daydreamgirl wrote:
Harry Potter is better than Twilight, and here's why:
1. Edward is abusive
2. Harry Potter appeals to a larger fan base, and only teenage girls like Twilight
3. Twilight fans are more annoying then Harry Potter fans
Twilight fans literally kill people for not liking the book/movie. They also rip each other apart at the sight of Edward.
Offline
I think Harry Potter's winning...
Offline
Half-Wolf-Leader wrote:
daydreamgirl wrote:
Harry Potter is better than Twilight, and here's why:
1. Edward is abusive
2. Harry Potter appeals to a larger fan base, and only teenage girls like Twilight
3. Twilight fans are more annoying then Harry Potter fansTwilight fans literally kill people for not liking the book/movie. They also rip each other apart at the sight of Edward.
It's true! And very, very, stupid...
Offline
daydreamgirl wrote:
I think Harry Potter's winning...
You win the biggest understatment of the Year Award!!
Offline
keikij wrote:
Half-Wolf-Leader wrote:
daydreamgirl wrote:
Harry Potter is better than Twilight, and here's why:
1. Edward is abusive
2. Harry Potter appeals to a larger fan base, and only teenage girls like Twilight
3. Twilight fans are more annoying then Harry Potter fansTwilight fans literally kill people for not liking the book/movie. They also rip each other apart at the sight of Edward.
It's true! And very, very, stupid...
They rip each other apart at the THOUGHT of Disco Ball Cullen.
Offline
harry potter is amazing the books and the movies are much better than both the twilight books and movies
GO HARRY POTTER
Offline
adriangl wrote:
The answer is simple. Twilight is for n00bs and Harry Potter is for awesome people. Harry Potter Rocks!
Twilight is for ineligible, emo females who know how their bodily fluids taste.
I'll write a short story titled "Edward Cullen Gets a Job" sometime soon. "Well sir, I slaughter endangered American animals, am partially albino, and don't know what a computer is"
Offline
big-bang wrote:
I'll write a short story titled "Edward Cullen Gets a Job" sometime soon. "Well sir, I slaughter endangered American animals, am partially albino, and don't know what a computer is"
Epic.
Offline
I know, lol
technoguyx wrote:
big-bang wrote:
I'll write a short story titled "Edward Cullen Gets a Job" sometime soon. "Well sir, I slaughter endangered American animals, am partially albino, and don't know what a computer is"
Epic.
Offline
harry potter
twilight fails. twilight is just only mainstream series right now, harry potter, imo, is a classic book series.
Offline
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/fe … ng-fiction
Everyone posting in the thread read that, it gives you your answer.
Also, read the stupid comments at the bottom. Twilight fangirls are not only obsessive, theyre stupid too. Honestly, not knowing why Stephen King has any right to critique books when hes one of the most famous authors there is.
Offline
GO TWILIGHT!!!!!!!!!! (Yes, I'm a guy.) The first and second books arent as good as Harry Potter, But the third and fourth are sooo much better. The movie also has less parts taken out. Twilight is also more detailed.
Offline
djm111 wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/fe … ng-fiction
Everyone posting in the thread read that, it gives you your answer.
Also, read the stupid comments at the bottom. Twilight fangirls are not only obsessive, theyre stupid too. Honestly, not knowing why Stephen King has any right to critique books when hes one of the most famous authors there is.
some people are obsessed w/twilight, but not everybody that reads it. I read the twilight books, I like them, but I'm not obsessed.
Offline
adriangl wrote:
I know, lol
technoguyx wrote:
big-bang wrote:
I'll write a short story titled "Edward Cullen Gets a Job" sometime soon. "Well sir, I slaughter endangered American animals, am partially albino, and don't know what a computer is"
Epic.
Kinda funny, but he knows what a computer is, AND mountain lions aren't endangered, and they go to Canada to hunt bears. But otherwise,LOL
Offline