Scratch

funelephant · 2012-09-29 18:21:39

*3rd wave coming soon*

hopefully

Mokat · 2012-09-29 18:34:51

funelephant wrote:
*3rd wave coming soon*

hopefully

+1

laser314 · 2012-09-29 18:43:09

ProgrammingFreak wrote:
laser314 wrote:
scimonster wrote:

Then i should have 3. because the mods were in the 1st wave:

Welcome, new testers!
New testers?
Scimonster was already a tester, along with others. Now he is welcoming all the new people from the 2nd wave.

Oh.

dvd4 · 2012-09-29 19:12:55

Mokat wrote:
funelephant wrote:
*3rd wave coming soon*

hopefully
+1

+2

Snowdrift · 2012-09-29 19:22:37

funelephant wrote:
*3rd wave coming soon*

hopefully

3rd Wave = Release tongue

veggieman001 · 2012-09-29 19:32:04

Snowdrift wrote:
funelephant wrote:
*3rd wave coming soon*

hopefully
3rd Wave = Release

i don't think so, or else they wouldn't have made that project there

dvd4 · 2012-09-29 19:41:26

veggieman001 wrote:
Snowdrift wrote:
funelephant wrote:
*3rd wave coming soon*

hopefully
3rd Wave = Release
i don't think so, or else they wouldn't have made that project there

good point

moretzprogramming · 2012-09-30 05:52:55

dvd4 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
Snowdrift wrote:

3rd Wave = Release
i don't think so, or else they wouldn't have made that project there
good point

Yeah, putting up that project would be useless if the 3rd wave was the full release. But I'm still looking forward to it!

Joewheeeeler · 2012-09-30 05:56:05

Never Mind... I Will keep Trying to be invited! Maybe the next phase? smile You Guys are sooo Lucky!

Optimax-DJ · 2012-09-30 05:59:27

I think they should make a classic view for mobile devices and older computers once the website does get updated. The new website is quite clunky on a mobile device. Maybe there could be a mobile version?

Tbtemplex97 · 2012-10-01 11:48:59

what about wiki members? im a wiki member

stevetheipad · 2012-10-01 12:34:19

Tbtemplex97 wrote:
what about wiki members? im a wiki member

Nope, they were not invited.

bobbybee · 2012-10-01 16:13:23

Pretty much everyone is a wiki tester sad

dvd4 · 2012-10-01 17:06:21

bobbybee wrote:
Pretty much everyone is a wiki tester

why the sad face ?

joletole · 2012-10-01 18:19:57

bobbybee wrote:
Pretty much everyone is a wiki tester

What? Wiki tester. Don't you mean alpha tester. But anyway, Admins on the Wiki do get access to 2.0.

veggieman001 · 2012-10-01 18:50:38

joletole wrote:
bobbybee wrote:
Pretty much everyone is a wiki tester
What? Wiki tester. Don't you mean alpha tester. But anyway, Admins on the Wiki do get access to 2.0.

no they don't

henley · 2012-10-01 19:26:23

joletole wrote:
bobbybee wrote:
Pretty much everyone is a wiki tester
What? Wiki tester. Don't you mean alpha tester. But anyway, Admins on the Wiki do get access to 2.0.

What makes you say that? I"m an admin on the Wiki, but I don't get access...

And technically, everyone has access, but only few no the password.

veggieman001 · 2012-10-01 19:39:39

henley wrote:
joletole wrote:
bobbybee wrote:
Pretty much everyone is a wiki tester
What? Wiki tester. Don't you mean alpha tester. But anyway, Admins on the Wiki do get access to 2.0.
What makes you say that? I"m an admin on the Wiki, but I don't get access...

um no you're not

joletole · 2012-10-01 19:46:19

henley wrote:
joletole wrote:
bobbybee wrote:
Pretty much everyone is a wiki tester
What? Wiki tester. Don't you mean alpha tester. But anyway, Admins on the Wiki do get access to 2.0.
What makes you say that? I"m an admin on the Wiki, but I don't get access...

Your not an admin?? The wiki is at wiki.scratch.mit.edu.

henley · 2012-10-01 20:06:00

veggieman001 wrote:
henley wrote:
joletole wrote:
What? Wiki tester. Don't you mean alpha tester. But anyway, Admins on the Wiki do get access to 2.0.
What makes you say that? I"m an admin on the Wiki, but I don't get access...
um no you're not

Oops, wrong terminology. tongue

What I meant is that I can edit stuff.

Firedrake969 · 2012-10-01 20:10:29

henley wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
henley wrote:
What makes you say that? I"m an admin on the Wiki, but I don't get access...
um no you're not
Oops, wrong terminology.

What I meant is that I can edit stuff.

So can over a hundred other Scratchers. xD

henley · 2012-10-01 20:19:54

I thought that's what (s)he meant!

veggieman001 · 2012-10-01 20:24:54

those are wiki editors
a wiki admin is someone who has administrative powers on the site, id est lucario621, jso, weirdf, chrischb, jonathanpb, scimonster, and me.
all of those people besides weirdf and me are able to access the alpha though (due to their other rankings/activities) so that may lead to the confusion.

MathWizz · 2012-10-02 11:58:13

Question... When will we receive access to this? I was one of the first 20 people to post on the project.

firedrake969_test · 2012-10-02 12:24:14

veggieman001 wrote:
those are wiki editors
a wiki admin is someone who has administrative powers on the site, id est lucario621, jso, weirdf, chrischb, jonathanpb, scimonster, and me.
all of those people besides weirdf and me are able to access the alpha though (due to their other rankings/activities) so that may lead to the confusion.

How do you become a wiki admin?

Scratch

archived forums

#126 2012-09-29 18:21:39

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#127 2012-09-29 18:34:51

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

funelephant wrote:

#128 2012-09-29 18:43:09

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

laser314 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

#129 2012-09-29 19:12:55

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

Mokat wrote:

funelephant wrote:

#130 2012-09-29 19:22:37

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

funelephant wrote:

#131 2012-09-29 19:32:04

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

Snowdrift wrote:

funelephant wrote:

#132 2012-09-29 19:41:26

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

veggieman001 wrote:

Snowdrift wrote:

funelephant wrote:

#133 2012-09-30 05:52:55

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

dvd4 wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

Snowdrift wrote:

#134 2012-09-30 05:56:05

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#135 2012-09-30 05:59:27

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#136 2012-10-01 11:48:59

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#137 2012-10-01 12:34:19

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

Tbtemplex97 wrote:

#138 2012-10-01 16:13:23

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#139 2012-10-01 17:06:21

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

bobbybee wrote:

#140 2012-10-01 18:19:57

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

bobbybee wrote:

#141 2012-10-01 18:50:38

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

joletole wrote:

bobbybee wrote:

#142 2012-10-01 19:26:23

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

joletole wrote:

bobbybee wrote:

#143 2012-10-01 19:39:39

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

henley wrote:

joletole wrote:

bobbybee wrote:

#144 2012-10-01 19:46:19

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

henley wrote:

joletole wrote:

bobbybee wrote:

#145 2012-10-01 20:06:00

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

veggieman001 wrote:

henley wrote:

joletole wrote:

#146 2012-10-01 20:10:29

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

henley wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

henley wrote:

#147 2012-10-01 20:19:54

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0