Scratch

soupoftomato · 2012-09-28 19:54:26

RedRocker227 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:

be more polite please
can you not mini-mod everyone

if there's a problem with a post, then report it
Also there's nothing wrong with mini-modding, it's helpful even

It appears condescending to the person you are mini-modding. Just report and keep to your own devices.

ImagineIt · 2012-09-28 20:20:54

soupoftomato wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:

can you not mini-mod everyone

if there's a problem with a post, then report it
Also there's nothing wrong with mini-modding, it's helpful even
It appears condescending to the person you are mini-modding. Just report and keep to your own devices.

That wasn't even mini modding. Just asking if they could be more polite...

bobbybee · 2012-09-28 20:57:48

Wow. The signup project is top viewed. yikes

dvd4 · 2012-09-28 21:33:38

bobbybee wrote:
Wow. The signup project is top viewed.

lol

OldWheezerGeezer · 2012-09-28 21:57:39

How about Scratch Wiki editors too smile

Mokat · 2012-09-28 22:19:45

OldWheezerGeezer wrote:
How about Scratch Wiki editors too

That would be good.

ImagineIt · 2012-09-28 22:23:29

Mokat wrote:
OldWheezerGeezer wrote:
How about Scratch Wiki editors too
That would be good.

Then there would be a million. Why do wiki editors get special preferences?

funelephant · 2012-09-28 22:30:30

ImagineIt wrote:
Mokat wrote:
OldWheezerGeezer wrote:
How about Scratch Wiki editors too
That would be good.
Then there would be a million. Why do wiki editors get special preferences?

oh don't be a debby downer.

There are a million curators anyways.

veggieman001 · 2012-09-28 22:34:06

number of curators: 89
number of wiki editors: 583

quite a bit of a difference there don't you think

ImagineIt · 2012-09-28 22:34:18

funelephant wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
Mokat wrote:

That would be good.
Then there would be a million. Why do wiki editors get special preferences?
oh don't be a debby downer.

There are a million curators anyways.

Not as many.

funelephant · 2012-09-28 22:43:26

ImagineIt wrote:
funelephant wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:

Then there would be a million. Why do wiki editors get special preferences?
oh don't be a debby downer.

There are a million curators anyways.
Not as many.

that's
awesome

PersainCatz · 2012-09-28 22:48:36

i signed up but i am not invited yet? sad

veggieman001 · 2012-09-28 23:09:26

funelephant wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
funelephant wrote:

oh don't be a debby downer.

There are a million curators anyways.
Not as many.
that's
awesome

can you like stop being rude please

PersainCatz wrote:
i signed up but i am not invited yet?

i don't think anyone who signed up has been invited; signups are for possible testing opportunities at an undetermined point in the future

Robojam200 · 2012-09-29 04:51:37

Just got a message big_smile Really excited to be helping out! I had so much fun being a curator :3

jji7skyline · 2012-09-29 06:43:56

Congrats smile

funelephant · 2012-09-29 08:41:21

veggieman001 wrote:
funelephant wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:

Not as many.
that's
awesome
can you like stop being rude please

What the heck.
I wasn't being rude.
That's my way of saying: ok fine whatever.

Firedrake969 · 2012-09-29 09:58:06

If you want to test the editor, you can. But I won't tell yet.

mortrop · 2012-09-29 11:13:32

i said signup on the project!

stevetheipad · 2012-09-29 11:44:28

Firedrake969 wrote:
If you want to test the editor, you can. But I won't tell yet.

Haha. tongue

veggieman001 · 2012-09-29 11:50:42

funelephant wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
funelephant wrote:

that's
awesome
can you like stop being rude please
What the heck.
I wasn't being rude.
That's my way of saying: ok fine whatever.

then why not just say that
because you just come off as sarcastic and mean-spirited otherwise neutral

Mokat · 2012-09-29 12:20:23

the comments on the project are just "signup signup signup signup signup"

scimonster · 2012-09-29 15:40:17

stevetheipad wrote:
I'm lovin' it!

I should get two accounts...I'm a curator and an SDS curator.

Then i should have 3. because the mods were in the 1st wave: tongue

Welcome, new testers!

laser314 · 2012-09-29 15:52:07

scimonster wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
I'm lovin' it!

I should get two accounts...I'm a curator and an SDS curator.
Then i should have 3. because the mods were in the 1st wave:

Welcome, new testers!

New testers?

soupoftomato · 2012-09-29 16:03:36

Mokat wrote:
the comments on the project are just "signup signup signup signup signup"

As intended.

ProgrammingFreak · 2012-09-29 17:30:43

laser314 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
I'm lovin' it!

I should get two accounts...I'm a curator and an SDS curator.
Then i should have 3. because the mods were in the 1st wave:

Welcome, new testers!
New testers?

Scimonster was already a tester, along with others. Now he is welcoming all the new people from the 2nd wave. smile

Scratch

archived forums

#101 2012-09-28 19:54:26

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

RedRocker227 wrote:

Wes64 wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

#102 2012-09-28 20:20:54

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

soupoftomato wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

Wes64 wrote:

#103 2012-09-28 20:57:48

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#104 2012-09-28 21:33:38

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

bobbybee wrote:

#105 2012-09-28 21:57:39

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#106 2012-09-28 22:19:45

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

OldWheezerGeezer wrote:

#107 2012-09-28 22:23:29

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

Mokat wrote:

OldWheezerGeezer wrote:

#108 2012-09-28 22:30:30

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

ImagineIt wrote:

Mokat wrote:

OldWheezerGeezer wrote:

#109 2012-09-28 22:34:06

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#110 2012-09-28 22:34:18

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

funelephant wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

Mokat wrote:

#111 2012-09-28 22:43:26

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

ImagineIt wrote:

funelephant wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

#112 2012-09-28 22:48:36

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#113 2012-09-28 23:09:26

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

funelephant wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

funelephant wrote:

PersainCatz wrote:

#114 2012-09-29 04:51:37

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#115 2012-09-29 06:43:56

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#116 2012-09-29 08:41:21

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

veggieman001 wrote:

funelephant wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

#117 2012-09-29 09:58:06

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#118 2012-09-29 11:13:32

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#119 2012-09-29 11:44:28

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

Firedrake969 wrote:

#120 2012-09-29 11:50:42

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

funelephant wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

funelephant wrote:

#121 2012-09-29 12:20:23

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

#122 2012-09-29 15:40:17

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

stevetheipad wrote:

#123 2012-09-29 15:52:07

Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0

scimonster wrote: