dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
and the topic in AT also discusses the site -_-ok im sorry -_-
but would you mind giving me a link -_-you mean like this ?
Well yeah but 1) that's still only the player and 2) that's offline, it's a static version, any changes made to the player since he downloaded won't occur on that
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
ok im sorry -_-
but would you mind giving me a link -_-you mean like this ?
Well yeah but 1) that's still only the player and 2) that's offline, it's a static version, any changes made to the player since he downloaded won't occur on that
1)it discusses the site too (if you has read some of the comments you would have know that)
2)there are ways to view it online that are discussed
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
you mean like this ?Well yeah but 1) that's still only the player and 2) that's offline, it's a static version, any changes made to the player since he downloaded won't occur on that
1)it discusses the site too (if you has read some of the comments you would have know that)
2)there are ways to view it online that are discussed
And this method is...?
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Well yeah but 1) that's still only the player and 2) that's offline, it's a static version, any changes made to the player since he downloaded won't occur on that
1)it discusses the site too (if you has read some of the comments you would have know that)
2)there are ways to view it online that are discussedAnd this method is...?
read the thread -_-
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
1)it discusses the site too (if you has read some of the comments you would have know that)
2)there are ways to view it online that are discussedAnd this method is...?
read the thread -_-
No thanks I'd rather not waste my time -_-
Unless you'd like to give me a link but I doubt that'll happen since it's impossible to access every part of the site -_-
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
And this method is...?read the thread -_-
No thanks I'd rather not waste my time -_-
Unless you'd like to give me a link but I doubt that'll happen since it's impossible to access every part of the site -_-
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
read the thread -_-
No thanks I'd rather not waste my time -_-
Unless you'd like to give me a link but I doubt that'll happen since it's impossible to access every part of the site -_-
That's just the login page, everything else can't be visited
I wouldn't call the login page the full site
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
No thanks I'd rather not waste my time -_-
Unless you'd like to give me a link but I doubt that'll happen since it's impossible to access every part of the site -_-That's just the login page, everything else can't be visited
I wouldn't call the login page the full site
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
That's just the login page, everything else can't be visited
I wouldn't call the login page the full site
That's just the login and feedback pages, everything else can't be visited
I wouldn't call the login and feedback pages the full site
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
That's just the login page, everything else can't be visited
I wouldn't call the login page the full siteThat's just the login and feedback pages, everything else can't be visited
I wouldn't call the login and feedback pages the full site
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
That's just the login and feedback pages, everything else can't be visited
I wouldn't call the login and feedback pages the full site
Yeah I already know about the pages you can visit, what I'm saying is that you can't access the whole site
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
That's just the login and feedback pages, everything else can't be visited
I wouldn't call the login and feedback pages the full siteYeah I already know about the pages you can visit, what I'm saying is that you can't access the whole site
alpha link
To activate it, highlight this:
javascript:document.body.childNodes[0].ASsetEditMode(true);
and drag it to your bookmark bar. On the alpha, click this bookmark and it will activate.
Last edited by joefarebrother (2012-09-27 15:28:10)
Offline
joefarebrother wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Yeah I already know about the pages you can visit, what I'm saying is that you can't access the whole site
alpha link
To activate it, highlight this:
javascript:document.body.childNodes[0].ASsetEditMode(true);
and drag it to your bookmark bar. On the alpha, click this bookmark and it will activate.
he already knows about that
Offline
Hi. I have a problem with Scratch 2.0. It's about my profile page. I can fill in the "About" section but the "What I'm working on section" just deletes all of text if you reload the page, and the "What I've been doing section" doesn't let me enter text at all.
I was wondering if anyone else has found this problem?
Offline
stevetheipad wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
i think wiki admins should automatically be invited too
We've got plenty of testers for now.
wow, how'd you get in charge??
as denoted by the , i was joking
especially because every other wiki admin besides me and weirdf already has alpha access
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
i think wiki admins should automatically be invited too
We've got plenty of testers for now.
wow, how'd you get in charge??
as denoted by the , i was joking
especially because every other wiki admin besides me and weirdf already has alpha access
Making a simple observation doesn't make me in charge.
Offline
stevetheipad wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
We've got plenty of testers for now.wow, how'd you get in charge??
as denoted by the , i was joking
especially because every other wiki admin besides me and weirdf already has alpha accessMaking a simple observation doesn't make me in charge.
the way you stated it as a sure fact, as well as using a first person pronoun, implies you are part of the authoritative body, no?
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
wow, how'd you get in charge??
as denoted by the , i was joking
especially because every other wiki admin besides me and weirdf already has alpha accessMaking a simple observation doesn't make me in charge.
the way you stated it as a sure fact, as well as using a first person pronoun, implies you are part of the authoritative body, no?
"We've" was referring to the beta team...and it's not a fact, it's an opinion.
Offline
stevetheipad wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
Making a simple observation doesn't make me in charge.the way you stated it as a sure fact, as well as using a first person pronoun, implies you are part of the authoritative body, no?
"We've" was referring to the beta team...and it's not a fact, it's an opinion.
perhaps it is an opinion, but it's definitely stated as fact
anyway, our irrelevancies are bogging up the thread
[/offtopic]
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
the way you stated it as a sure fact, as well as using a first person pronoun, implies you are part of the authoritative body, no?"We've" was referring to the beta team...and it's not a fact, it's an opinion.
perhaps it is an opinion, but it's definitely stated as fact
anyway, our irrelevancies are bogging up the thread
[/offtopic]
IMO, he was in charge, or so he wrote.[/moreofftopicness]
Offline
NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dang.... I never got chosen as a curator, now I can't get in X 1,000,000,000,000!!! Is there any other way, or is it too late? I really am not that much of a n00b.... And I would really like to test it again...
Offline
LEGOengineer261 wrote:
NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dang.... I never got chosen as a curator, now I can't get in X 1,000,000,000,000!!! Is there any other way, or is it too late? I really am not that much of a n00b.... And I would really like to test it again...
Lightnin wrote:
If you haven't been invited to test out Scratch 2.0, but would like to be, you can leave a comment with the word "signup" on this project:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/gobo/2801565
Offline
Nomolos wrote:
Wow! Scratch 2.0 seems so close!
The Scratch Team still has lots to do, but yeah, everyday is closer!
Offline