My first attempt. Also, the title just made me think of this...
Edit: Original image
Last edited by 16Skittles (2012-09-26 22:42:43)
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
http://i48.tinypic.com/14tpkk1.jpg
My first attempt. Also, the title just made me think of this...
Edit: Original image
Niccceeee!...
Offline
The wheels should be a little more blurred imo, right now it doesn't look like they're spinning, or not spinning, but otherwise it's pretty good
Offline
I posted some tutorials, feel free to ask me any questions
Offline
Those look awesome Has anyone else noticed that cars look like they have faces, it creeps me out o_0
I made one But since my image hosting site fails i had to post it on a project
Here
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
The wheels should be a little more blurred imo, right now it doesn't look like they're spinning, or not spinning, but otherwise it's pretty good
![]()
Yeah, the problem was that when I blurred them more they looked really bad. Am I supposed to just select the center of the wheels or the entire tire? That may be part of my problem.
Offline
It doesn't really matter, as long as you do a radial motion blur, and have the centre set correctly
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
It doesn't really matter, as long as you do a radial motion blur, and have the centre set correctly
![]()
Well, I didn't set the center. I'll try again later.
Offline
Here's my second attempt:
Before: http://www.clutchd.com/wp-content/galle … es_001.jpg
After:
Offline
@Discussion of old cars being better:
But new cars will have better safety featured and stuff, which is one of the most important things about a car.
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
@Discussion of old cars being better:
But new cars will have better safety featured and stuff, which is one of the most important things about a car.
Safety features aren't needed unless the car is going to get crashed. Wait, did I just say that? O.o [/offtopic]
@BirdByte: what did the original look like?
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
@Discussion of old cars being better:
But new cars will have better safety featured and stuff, which is one of the most important things about a car.
And the newer cars often look sexier, which is the most thing about a car
Jk. I can still appreciate a classic corvette or something
Speaking of which...
original
Edit: Finally figured out how to make smoke not look unnatural (sharp edges)
Last edited by 16Skittles (2012-09-27 19:33:55)
Offline
It looks like the corvette is just about to take off
The smoke should be a little more concentrated around the wheels though.
@wasabi: Scroll a little down the page on this topic.
Offline
Your changes are very good, jji7skyline!
I have gimp, but I have no Idea how to do that with it.
note: At the time of this posting, the number of comments I have made equals the number of posts I have made.
Last edited by LiquidMetal (2012-09-27 20:21:18)
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
@BirdByte: what did the original look like?
Err, there's a link in the post.
BirdByte wrote:
http://www.clutchd.com/wp-content/gallery/20_january_2010-mustang-gt-pace-car/2011_ford_mustang_gt_pace_car_images_001.jpg
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
CylonToast wrote:
Well you're an iPad, so your father is Steve Jobs, which is just as good if not better since Apple is the top company in the world right now![]()
No, MS is still winning.
Microsoft doesn't have $700 per share, or a 100 billion dollar surplus. MS has bigger market share, but not the same profits.
@topic: I have to try this, it seems really cool![]()
@soft: <3 Corvette!![]()
The ones I have posted are a Camaro and a Mustang, no Corvettes. But I do agree, I <3 Corvettes.
Offline
soft319 wrote:
16Skittles wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
No, MS is still winning.Microsoft doesn't have $700 per share, or a 100 billion dollar surplus. MS has bigger market share, but not the same profits.
@topic: I have to try this, it seems really cool![]()
@soft: <3 Corvette!![]()
The ones I have posted are a Camaro and a Mustang, no Corvettes. But I do agree, I <3 Corvettes.
Oops, it was fire who posted the corvettes. I always get you two mixed up
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
soft319 wrote:
16Skittles wrote:
Microsoft doesn't have $700 per share, or a 100 billion dollar surplus. MS has bigger market share, but not the same profits.
@topic: I have to try this, it seems really cool![]()
@soft: <3 Corvette!![]()
The ones I have posted are a Camaro and a Mustang, no Corvettes. But I do agree, I <3 Corvettes.
Oops, it was fire who posted the corvettes. I always get you two mixed up
![]()
Lol. Also, nice Lamborghini, if I spelled that right.
Offline