Scratch
archived forums
#1 2012-09-14 20:09:17
- legobob23o
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-06-22
- Posts: 500+
200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
When a Scratcher has more than 200 posts then on the forum status, it would say "[user's name] 200+" That's an example of my idea so I hope you support and Scratch On! 
Offline
It's called 
#3 2012-09-14 20:54:41
- Molybdenum
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-06-17
- Posts: 1000+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
dvd4 wrote:
isn't there already a thread about this ?
I think it was about something like 2000+, 5000+, 10000+, etc.
"The Enrichment Center is required to remind you that you will be baked, and then there will be cake."
(|Balls and Platforms: Stay on!|) (|NaOS-H: An operating system... Or is it?|)
Offline
#4 2012-09-14 21:00:01
- veggieman001
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-02-20
- Posts: 1000+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
I disagree, I think 100+, 500+, and 1000+ are enough. Small differences aren't really that significant.
Posts: 20000 - Show all posts
Offline
#5 2012-09-14 21:00:11
- mythbusteranimator
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-02-28
- Posts: 1000+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
Molybdenum wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
isn't there already a thread about this ?
I think it was about something like 2000+, 5000+, 10000+, etc.
That WOULD be useful.
clicky
Offline
#7 2012-09-14 22:40:45
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
its fine the way it is, the post count only serves as a representation of the user's forum experience.
Experienced 2.0 Tester: Ask me questions!
Using Firefox 13.0, Flash plugin version 11.4.402.287, and Windows XP Professional.
Offline
#8 2012-09-14 23:41:52
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
Wes64 wrote:
its fine the way it is, the post count only serves as a representation of the user's forum experience.
+1
If you added smaller increments it makes people more likely to race for higher levels, which is why they got rid of post count in the first place.
Offline
#9 2012-09-15 00:05:56
- OverPowered
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-07-27
- Posts: 100+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
Wes64 wrote:
its fine the way it is, the post count only serves as a representation of the user's forum experience.
Yes. ^^^
Hopefully a person's posts are interesting enough that people will judge the poster on the quality of their posts instead of the number... 
Offline
#11 2012-09-15 10:47:17
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
*Ahem* Over here.
Last edited by CN12 (2012-09-15 10:47:40)
Click this on April 15th to see the new album from The 10th Dimension!
Offline
#12 2012-09-15 11:09:24
- ErnieParke
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-12-03
- Posts: 1000+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
Mokat wrote:
I think the only extra ones we need would be a five thousand one and a 10 thousand one. Small increments are unnecessary.
1000+ already shows that you've helped a lot of other scratchers, so 5000+ and 10,000+ are unnecessary.
Offline
#13 2012-09-15 11:30:01
- Firedrake969
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-11-24
- Posts: 1000+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
IMO, these are what count:
100+
500+
1000+
5000+
10,000+
Click the sign.
Offline
#14 2012-09-15 11:37:08
- OverPowered
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-07-27
- Posts: 100+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
ErnieParke wrote:
Mokat wrote:
I think the only extra ones we need would be a five thousand one and a 10 thousand one. Small increments are unnecessary.
1000+ already shows that you've helped a lot of other scratchers, so 5000+ and 10,000+ are unnecessary.
+1
Showing that you have 10,000 posts isn't necessary at all. It's really just bragging that you have a lot of posts...
Offline
#15 2012-09-15 14:41:41
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
OverPowered wrote:
ErnieParke wrote:
Mokat wrote:
I think the only extra ones we need would be a five thousand one and a 10 thousand one. Small increments are unnecessary.
1000+ already shows that you've helped a lot of other scratchers, so 5000+ and 10,000+ are unnecessary.
+1
Showing that you have 10,000 posts isn't necessary at all. It's really just bragging that you have a lot of posts...
+1 and besides, most people who reach 10000 posts are mostly from the MAC, RAP, or old Misc. forums... So many of those posts aren't really "helpful" posts. 1000 just shows that you've been on the forums for a long enough time to help someone with their problem and answer it correctly (hopefully)
Offline
#17 2012-09-15 16:47:11
- legobob23o
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-06-22
- Posts: 500+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
kayybee wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
its fine the way it is, the post count only serves as a representation of the user's forum experience.
+1
If you added smaller increments it makes people more likely to race for higher levels, which is why they got rid of post count in the first place.
Oh. Guess so. (Hey, that rhymes!)
Offline
#19 2012-09-15 18:41:38
- ErnieParke
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-12-03
- Posts: 1000+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
soniku3 wrote:
MathWizz wrote:
I thinks it should be ...247, 248, 248, 249, 250, 251...
Do you even wonder why it was deleted?
It was deleted because the ST didn't want people post spamming.
Offline
#20 2012-09-17 13:01:09
- sonicfan12p
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-11-16
- Posts: 1000+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
CN12 wrote:
*Ahem* Over here.
*cough*
Why are the secret organizations getting all the attention?
Offline
#21 2012-09-17 14:06:49
- legobob23o
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-06-22
- Posts: 500+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
veggieman001 wrote:
I disagree, I think 100+, 500+, and 1000+ are enough. Small differences aren't really that significant.
Isn't therea 600+? 
Offline
#23 2012-09-17 14:59:07
- ErnieParke
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-12-03
- Posts: 1000+
Re: 200+, 300+, 400+, etc.
This isn't a duplicate of that topic because this topic is discussing adding 200+, 300+, ect… while your topic is discussing adding 2,000+, 5,000+, and 10,000+.
Last edited by ErnieParke (2012-09-17 14:59:51)
Offline