I have an idea:
Keep the new website at scratch.mit.edu
Have this website at scratch.mit.edu/scratch1.4
Offline
Yeah, I do admit, I will miss 1.4, knowing that's what I've known pretty much since I joined Scratch. But, 2.0 will be really cool, knowing all the cool neat extra things you can do!
Offline
JH1010 wrote:
I have an idea:
Keep the new website at scratch.mit.edu
Have this website at scratch.mit.edu/scratch1.4
That would only be 1 page, so make a server called
old.scratch.mit.edu
or something along those lines.
Offline
wolvesstar97 wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
I have an idea:
Keep the new website at scratch.mit.edu
Have this website at scratch.mit.edu/scratch1.4That would only be 1 page, so make a server called
old.scratch.mit.edu
or something along those lines.
This kind of solution can seem really simple and obvious, until you start to look into the details. For example, we spend tens of thousands of dollars a year moderating Scratch. If we kept the old site, we'd have to moderate two sites: the old, and the new. It's a complex task, and there's just not enough resources / attention to manage it.
CyanCyndaquil wrote:
Yeah, I do admit, I will miss 1.4, knowing that's what I've known pretty much since I joined Scratch. But, 2.0 will be really cool, knowing all the cool neat extra things you can do!
Yep, it's totally bittersweet. As I mentioned in an earlier post, I'm going to miss the current site too - even though I'm looking forward to 2.0.
Last edited by Lightnin (2012-08-14 16:38:59)
Offline
And, Lightnin (I think it was him, maybe Paddle) said that we might get another trial thing this month, so maybe you'll get used to it because it's going to be longer if they do do it.
Offline
I just read the entire thread.
I kinda like S2, but only the new features. The weird icons confuse me, firstly.
The textures are SOOOOOOOOOO much different than the ones we've been used to.
Comment bubbles don't work. Blocks are bigger.
The overall feeling - Scratch feels "softer" in S2, with all the "glow" effects. S1.4 seems more solid, a better "foundation" for other programming languages (Don't ask where I got that analogy). Maybe a texture toggle will fix this part.
S2 is a lot slower, even with the all at once block (which does not actually run it all at once).
Many shortcuts we're used to don't exist in S2, such as putting a C-block above a script to put it in the C.
The whole layout. I haven't seen it, but I can infer 2 things:
Its generally more like facebook or whatever, even if just a bit.
A toggle old layout will solve most complaints.
So, my opinion is: I don't like S2, but mainly the textures (of the program and website) and speed. A toggle texture will solve my, and most other's, complaints.
Last edited by Molybdenum (2012-09-10 20:47:18)
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
I just read the entire thread.
I kinda like S2, but only the new features. The weird icons confuse me, firstly.
The textures are SOOOOOOOOOO much different than the ones we've been used to.
Comment bubbles don't work. Blocks are bigger.
The overall feeling - Scratch feels "softer" in S2, with all the "glow" effects. S1.4 seems more solid, a better "foundation" for other programming languages (Don't ask where I got that analogy). Maybe a texture toggle will fix this part.
S2 is a lot slower, even with the all at once block (which does not actually run it all at once).
Many shortcuts we're used to don't exist in S2, such as putting a C-block above a script to put it in the C.
The whole layout. I haven't seen it, but I can infer 2 things:
Its generally more like facebook or whatever, even if just a bit.
A toggle old layout will solve most complaints.
So, my opinion is: I don't like S2, but mainly the textures (of the program and website) and speed. A toggle texture will solve my, and most other's, complaints.
^THIS
I agree. I thought it would be nice if there was a "classic" mode.
And it looks too much like facebook T_T
Offline
samid11 wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
I just read the entire thread.
I kinda like S2, but only the new features. The weird icons confuse me, firstly.
The textures are SOOOOOOOOOO much different than the ones we've been used to.
Comment bubbles don't work. Blocks are bigger.
The overall feeling - Scratch feels "softer" in S2, with all the "glow" effects. S1.4 seems more solid, a better "foundation" for other programming languages (Don't ask where I got that analogy). Maybe a texture toggle will fix this part.
S2 is a lot slower, even with the all at once block (which does not actually run it all at once).
Many shortcuts we're used to don't exist in S2, such as putting a C-block above a script to put it in the C.
The whole layout. I haven't seen it, but I can infer 2 things:
Its generally more like facebook or whatever, even if just a bit.
A toggle old layout will solve most complaints.
So, my opinion is: I don't like S2, but mainly the textures (of the program and website) and speed. A toggle texture will solve my, and most other's, complaints.^THIS
I agree. I thought it would be nice if there was a "classic" mode.
And it looks too much like facebook T_T
*gasp*
I just got this-ed!
And just making sure, everyone knows about this, right?
javascript:var p=document.getElementsByTagName('object')[0];p.removeAttribute('width');p.removeAttribute('height');var s=p.style;s.left=s.right=s.top=s.bottom='0';s.position='fixed';s.width=s.height='100%';s.margin=0;p.ASsetEditMode(true)
Paste that in a flash player project's url, and you're into S2!
Offline
Now Scratch 2.0 seems too close.
Goodbye, TBGs. :`(
Offline
mythbusteranimator wrote:
Now Scratch 2.0 seems too close.
Goodbye, TBGs. :`(
Goodbye, old flash player.
Goodbye, Destroy the thingy.
Goodbye, SiS.
Goodbye, 1 second hashes.
Goodbye, website.
Goodbye, "solid" look.
Goodbye.
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
mythbusteranimator wrote:
Now Scratch 2.0 seems too close.
Goodbye, TBGs. :`(Goodbye, old flash player.
Goodbye, Destroy the thingy.
Goodbye, SiS.
Goodbye, 1 second hashes.
Goodbye, website.
Goodbye, "solid" look.
Goodbye.
Exactly.
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
mythbusteranimator wrote:
Now Scratch 2.0 seems too close.
Goodbye, TBGs. :`(Goodbye, old flash player.
Goodbye, Destroy the thingy.
Goodbye, SiS.
Goodbye, 1 second hashes.
Goodbye, website.
Goodbye, "solid" look.
Goodbye.
Sorry for being an idiot, but what's SiS?
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
wolvesstar97 wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
I have an idea:
Keep the new website at scratch.mit.edu
Have this website at scratch.mit.edu/scratch1.4That would only be 1 page, so make a server called
old.scratch.mit.edu
or something along those lines.This kind of solution can seem really simple and obvious, until you start to look into the details. For example, we spend tens of thousands of dollars a year moderating Scratch. If we kept the old site, we'd have to moderate two sites: the old, and the new. It's a complex task, and there's just not enough resources / attention to manage it.
What about a read-only version?
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
mythbusteranimator wrote:
Now Scratch 2.0 seems too close.
Goodbye, TBGs. :`(Goodbye, old flash player.
Goodbye, Destroy the thingy.
Goodbye, SiS.
Goodbye, 1 second hashes.
Goodbye, website.
Goodbye, "solid" look.
Goodbye.
I'm going to go cry and take a depression shower. BRB.
Oh, wait, I still have to wollow in pity for myself/the rest of scratch.
Offline
nama wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
mythbusteranimator wrote:
Now Scratch 2.0 seems too close.
Goodbye, TBGs. :`(Goodbye, old flash player.
Goodbye, Destroy the thingy.
Goodbye, SiS.
Goodbye, 1 second hashes.
Goodbye, website.
Goodbye, "solid" look.
Goodbye.Sorry for being an idiot, but what's SiS?
SiS=Martiscratch's 50 Bits "remix" is not really a remix, its a copy, since I said in the project notes that I had made it 1s1s, but just didn't upload it.
Of course its not that. Its WAY more complicated.
Last edited by Molybdenum (2012-09-11 20:42:49)
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
wolvesstar97 wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
I have an idea:
Keep the new website at scratch.mit.edu
Have this website at scratch.mit.edu/scratch1.4That would only be 1 page, so make a server called
old.scratch.mit.edu
or something along those lines.This kind of solution can seem really simple and obvious, until you start to look into the details. For example, we spend tens of thousands of dollars a year moderating Scratch. If we kept the old site, we'd have to moderate two sites: the old, and the new. It's a complex task, and there's just not enough resources / attention to manage it.
How about making a read-only old.scratch.mit.edu?
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
I just read the entire thread.
I kinda like S2, but only the new features. The weird icons confuse me, firstly.
The textures are SOOOOOOOOOO much different than the ones we've been used to.
Comment bubbles don't work. Blocks are bigger.
The overall feeling - Scratch feels "softer" in S2, with all the "glow" effects. S1.4 seems more solid, a better "foundation" for other programming languages (Don't ask where I got that analogy). Maybe a texture toggle will fix this part.
S2 is a lot slower, even with the all at once block (which does not actually run it all at once).
Many shortcuts we're used to don't exist in S2, such as putting a C-block above a script to put it in the C.
The whole layout. I haven't seen it, but I can infer 2 things:
Its generally more like facebook or whatever, even if just a bit.
A toggle old layout will solve most complaints.
So, my opinion is: I don't like S2, but mainly the textures (of the program and website) and speed. A toggle texture will solve my, and most other's, complaints.
+111111111111111111111111111111111111
Offline
IMO, the decision to use vector graphics is a really poor decision in introducing programming.
With a raster program you can have pixel perfect sensing.
Offline
wolvesstar97 wrote:
JH1010 wrote:
I have an idea:
Keep the new website at scratch.mit.edu
Have this website at scratch.mit.edu/scratch1.4That would only be 1 page, so make a server called
old.scratch.mit.edu
or something along those lines.
There's always the Wayback machine.
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
I just read the entire thread.
I kinda like S2, but only the new features. The weird icons confuse me, firstly.
The textures are SOOOOOOOOOO much different than the ones we've been used to.
Comment bubbles don't work. Blocks are bigger.
The overall feeling - Scratch feels "softer" in S2, with all the "glow" effects. S1.4 seems more solid, a better "foundation" for other programming languages (Don't ask where I got that analogy). Maybe a texture toggle will fix this part.
S2 is a lot slower, even with the all at once block (which does not actually run it all at once).
Many shortcuts we're used to don't exist in S2, such as putting a C-block above a script to put it in the C.
The whole layout. I haven't seen it, but I can infer 2 things:
Its generally more like facebook or whatever, even if just a bit.
A toggle old layout will solve most complaints.
So, my opinion is: I don't like S2, but mainly the textures (of the program and website) and speed. A toggle texture will solve my, and most other's, complaints.
I Just Got great Idea! Customizable Textures! Download a .zip with all the block/menu textures so you can have old textures, 2.0 textures, or custom textures. Hows That for an idea?
Offline
Maybe in a later version, the ST will make it possible to choose different themes of the site, and "old Scratch" could be one of them? It would be all the same features, but it would look more similar to 1.4, for those with a severe case of nostalgia.
Offline
Tatl wrote:
Maybe in a later version, the ST will make it possible to choose different themes of the site, and "old Scratch" could be one of them? It would be all the same features, but it would look more similar to 1.4, for those with a severe case of nostalgia.
No, I'm afraid that's not possible.
There's gonna be a lot of sadness when the old site goes - from me as well. Not because I don't think the new site will (eventually - maybe not at first) be better, but because I've spent a lot of time on the old site- it feels like home in a way that the new site doesn't yet.
I keep thinking we need to have a funeral for the old site, or maybe a going away party? Not sure what to call it yet... But one idea is to have a Scratch Design Studio where people make nostalgia projects for the old site - kind of a scrapbook kind of thing? I don't know - still thinking of ideas. If you have suggestions, please let me know.
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
Tatl wrote:
Maybe in a later version, the ST will make it possible to choose different themes of the site, and "old Scratch" could be one of them? It would be all the same features, but it would look more similar to 1.4, for those with a severe case of nostalgia.
No, I'm afraid that's not possible.
There's gonna be a lot of sadness when the old site goes - from me as well. Not because I don't think the new site will (eventually - maybe not at first) be better, but because I've spent a lot of time on the old site- it feels like home in a way that the new site doesn't yet.
I keep thinking we need to have a funeral for the old site, or maybe a going away party? Not sure what to call it yet... But one idea is to have a Scratch Design Studio where people make nostalgia projects for the old site - kind of a scrapbook kind of thing? I don't know - still thinking of ideas. If you have suggestions, please let me know.
I'm gonna make a nostalgia project a week before the dates are announced.
Offline