This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2012-09-03 10:34:57

legobob23o
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-06-22
Posts: 500+

Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

I don't really like having to go to other websites just to share and host images. So I thought Scratch could have its own Image-Hosting area on the site and people can use them in Forum Posts and stuff.

Offline

 

#2 2012-09-03 10:47:35

owetre18
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-01
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

Good idea. Support.

Offline

 

#3 2012-09-03 11:25:14

BirdByte
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-07-07
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

Tinypic is just too easy.  hmm


http://i50.tinypic.com/312u714.jpg

Offline

 

#4 2012-09-03 12:15:38

owetre18
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-01
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

BirdByte wrote:

Tinypic is just too easy.  hmm

But what about parents that are too overprotective and block ALL image hosting sites?

Scratch would be good for people like this.

Offline

 

#5 2012-09-03 12:47:50

jvvg
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-03-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

owetre18 wrote:

BirdByte wrote:

Tinypic is just too easy.  hmm

But what about parents that are too overprotective and block ALL image hosting sites?

Scratch would be good for people like this.

I have never heard of a parent who is that overprotective.

Also, an image service actually has nothing to do with what this website is intended for. Don't support.


http://tiny.cc/zwgbewhttp://tiny.cc/e1gbewhttp://tiny.cc/zygbewhttp://tiny.cc/izgbew
Goodbye, Scratch 1.4  sad                                                        Hello Scratch 2.0!  smile

Offline

 

#6 2012-09-03 12:49:43

TheMagician
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-09-25
Posts: 62

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

I also don't support. jvvg is right.


http://i48.tinypic.com/f7x4h.png

Offline

 

#7 2012-09-03 13:07:35

Wes64
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-08-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

i support jvvg

its just too easy to find a workaround. if your parents were that overprotective i bet you wouldn't even be on the forums at all.

besides, if all these images were being uploaded the st would not only have to build additional things for the website but would also need much more space

if your parents really are that overprotective, just put the image in a scratch project and upload it


Experienced 2.0 Tester: Ask me questions!
Using Firefox 13.0, Flash plugin version 11.4.402.287, and Windows XP Professional.

Offline

 

#8 2012-09-03 14:11:18

legobob23o
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-06-22
Posts: 500+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

jvvg wrote:

owetre18 wrote:

BirdByte wrote:

Tinypic is just too easy.  hmm

But what about parents that are too overprotective and block ALL image hosting sites?

Scratch would be good for people like this.

I have never heard of a parent who is that overprotective.

Also, an image service actually has nothing to do with what this website is intended for. Don't support.

Well, What if there ARE parents that overprotective? Scratch would be good for people in that kind of situation like owetre18 said.

Offline

 

#9 2012-09-03 14:30:58

jvvg
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-03-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

legobob23o wrote:

jvvg wrote:

owetre18 wrote:


But what about parents that are too overprotective and block ALL image hosting sites?

Scratch would be good for people like this.

I have never heard of a parent who is that overprotective.

Also, an image service actually has nothing to do with what this website is intended for. Don't support.

Well, What if there ARE parents that overprotective? Scratch would be good for people in that kind of situation like owetre18 said.

Let's stop with the hypotheticals. Besides, if any parent was that overprotective, they probably wouldn't let their kid use Scratch at all.


http://tiny.cc/zwgbewhttp://tiny.cc/e1gbewhttp://tiny.cc/zygbewhttp://tiny.cc/izgbew
Goodbye, Scratch 1.4  sad                                                        Hello Scratch 2.0!  smile

Offline

 

#10 2012-09-03 14:43:00

Molybdenum
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-06-17
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

owetre18 wrote:

BirdByte wrote:

Tinypic is just too easy.  hmm

But what about parents that are too overprotective and block ALL image hosting sites?

Scratch would be good for people like this.

Yes. Technically, I'm just afraid of getting viruses by loading ads on things like those sites.


"The Enrichment Center is required to remind you that you will be baked, and then there will be cake."
(|Balls and Platforms: Stay on!|) (|NaOS-H: An operating system... Or is it?|)

Offline

 

#11 2012-09-03 14:45:33

zammer990
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-01-22
Posts: 500+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

Tinypic is really easy, and overprotective parents would hardly let you on fourums with other people if they block image sites. Also, an image hosting would require A.A lot of memory space, and B.intensive moderation.


http://i45.tinypic.com/2ynq7nn.jpg Play now!

Offline

 

#12 2012-09-03 15:42:57

TheMagician
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-09-25
Posts: 62

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

Parents over-protective enough to not let you see any pictures probably wouldn't have you on the internet.


http://i48.tinypic.com/f7x4h.png

Offline

 

#13 2012-09-03 16:14:59

owetre18
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-01
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

TheMagician wrote:

Parents over-protective enough to not let you see any pictures probably wouldn't have you on the internet.

I remember a case where there was a scratcher who had this problem. Parental controls, and too many of them. They just forgot to block scratch.

Last edited by owetre18 (2012-09-03 16:15:12)

Offline

 

#14 2012-09-03 19:12:57

funelephant
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-07-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

Can't control who or what goes on there.
Don't Support.

Last edited by funelephant (2012-09-03 19:15:26)


nicki begs to differ
http://24.media.tumblr.com/ab0e6e8fd347c5e39c2821bcab9d16e6/tumblr_mgu35sui1L1rfb7aqo2_500.gif

Offline

 

#15 2012-09-03 23:00:09

OverPowered
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-07-27
Posts: 100+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

Whose parents are that overprotective? Mine.  tongue  I had to fight to be able to get on Scratch.

But even though I essentially cannot use images in my posts, I'm ok. What would I need images for on a programming website's forum that comes ready-loaded with Scratchblocks?

Hosting and moderating this mostly nonessential service is not worth it, at least not right now.  smile


Newest project: Tunnel TEST ~http://blocks.scratchr.org/API.php?user=OverPowered&action=onlineStatus~ On my mind: Unicameralism

Offline

 

#16 2012-09-04 13:34:36

scimonster
Community Moderator
Registered: 2010-06-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: Scratch Could Have Its Own Image-Hosting-Area

Doesn't seem so practical. As several users have stated above, it requires a ton of server space that Scratch doesn't have. A $500 donation (or any, really) would help their server, if you would like to.  smile
Moderation of all these images being uploaded is also just something the mods do not really want to commit to. While some might think of us as being here to put out flames and move/close topics, we really just try to be extra helpful members of the community, with moderating as an extra privilege/responsibility.
So, while i understand your intentions with this idea, it's just not really practical.

Offline

 

Board footer